From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Cell biologists are cooler than molecular biologists
|
Score: 11 microliters of Zima
|
| Nominated by:
|
SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 11
|
- nom and for. so VFH is slowing down again. the solution? everyone write more, and everyone nominate awesome articles. i've just done the second. now i'm off to tackle the first. do it. you won't. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- For, although it should be pointed out that they both suck compared to anyone involved in biostatistics. Those guys can calculate how hard to party to the eleventh decimal place! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- 4 - Damn micropipetting bastards... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:28, Oct 10
- Self-for. This article is entirely factual, by the way.
 pillow talk 20:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. Le Cejak • <20:31 Oct 10, 2008>
- For.
 Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate  20:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. Oh, hell yes. I almost forgot about this until it resurfaced here. Strong for from me. --Mr. Monkey
 Pant-hoot here. 22:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:04, Oct 11
- For. I like. --UU - natter
 10:33, Oct 13
- Strong for. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 17:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Dear God, For. That's more like it. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain. - The style is not my thing, though I like the idea. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 19:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Abstain. - The style is not my thing, though I like the idea. — 