Uncyclopedia:VFH/4chan (2nd nomination)

Article: 4chan	Score: -4 Retards at 4chan
Nominated by:	\|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kemador CUN\|IC Kill \| 23:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 1	For. Hello, it's a good article! \|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kemador CUN\|IC Kill \| 23:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against We are not featuring an article just because it exists. We feature articles that are good, and that are voted to be good by the community. And what makes you think anybody's opinion is going to change in three days? -RA HB 23:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Against. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Against Being called a dick for not approving almost, but not quite made me vote "for" on it. You need to use stronger and more juvenile insults to get people to change their votes. (please note the obvious sarcasm). --Mnbvcxz 01:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Against as this article is a clusterfuckload of shit. pillow talk 06:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Against. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 06:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Now, for fuck's sake, approve this article to be featured ~~or you're a dick.~~ \|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kemador CUN\|IC Kill \| 23:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Comments This sentence should be shot! "4chan was founded by the Something Awful admins to feed their ongoing obsession with animated naked furry pedophile hentai OS-Tan oil wrestling GIFs, furries having sex with animals and amusing pictures of snowy owls." It's a bad list in sentence form. Despite this, there was a For vote out in the lobby but Networks came over and beat the fucking crap out of it personally.-- 01:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)