Talk:Wikipedia/archive

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Wikipedia/archive. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

scandal

saw this article in the UnNews and thought i should point it out.

lmao

"this might not be an accurate website" Guiltyyouthclique 02:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Origins of Dikipedia

Can someone add this please as the article is uneditable - 'The idea for Dikipedia came from the old joke about the Dickencyclopedias in the Soviet Union that had looseleaf pages.'

Oscar Wilde ???

Now, tell me, what's the things about Oscar Wilde? "Wilde Wilde Wicked Dikipedia" (from an unnews headline)... now what? Maybe since I'm not natively English-speaking, I haven't been able to completely grasp the funniness of Oscar Wilde... --sigs

Well, nothing about him is funny, really, I think that they just choosed a person. - The preceding unsigned comment was added by I.P. Freely on 48:43, 13 February 1006

Chuck Norris

He's funnier than Oscar Wilde. And Adolf Hilter. And Jesus Christ. He's the funniest one of the regular Uncyclopedia personality references.

Unlock

Very important addition about Wikipedia Bully!!! Must be added for Truthiness!!! Woman Who Speaks Truthiness 17:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

“Wikipedia, worser you can't get”

~ Phil Osophy on this pseudo-encyclopdia

N, 02/28/06, 10:45am Pacific: Someone has totally replaced this article with a verbatim rip of Wikipedia's own article on itself. WTF? I'm reverting this page back to the Uncyclopedia version as it existed prior to the edit. Geez.

I vote this page to be on Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion for no reason! Who's with me? --Darkdan 23:01, 7 Mar 2005 (EST)

Me me me! --Chronarion 23:08, 7 Mar 2005 (EST)

why not change this article to be like this??

Make a article about a parallel universe (this universe would be your universe). We are impossible to go to this universe (make a quote of a god or another powerfull person saying this) and the only connection between this universe and our universe is a webpage called wikipedia. And change the "For those without comedic tastes, the so-called-experts at Wikipedia have an article about: Wikipedia" to "For more information how this is on the parallel universe, Wikipedia have an article about: Wikipedia."

Because that's a stupid idea. The current version was featured. Not. That. One. And also that's unsigned. How hard is it to type four friking tidles? (~~~~) -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 21:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

It'd be nice if the column of this article'd be 2000 characters wide. Also I'd like the article be a short one.84.231.189.229 04:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

This page used to be funny

Now it's just gone overboard with all this crap. it's just stupid now.

Oh noes! It's overboard with CrAp! Well than fix it. SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 21:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

But how can I fix it now when it's all stupid and crappy and not funny, Dear SonicChao, how shall I fix it I pray? Myles325 06:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs fixin', please feel obligated to make whatever changes you feel are needed, (even though they'll probably be reverted 5 seconds later). Uncyclopedia is a wiki, so almost anyone can edit almost any article by almost simply following the edit link almost at the top. You don't even need to log in in most cases! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Uncyclopedia Cabal encourages you to be italic. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly, and your 6 month ban will fly by faster than you think. If you're not sure how editing works, check out proper wiki formatting, or use the sandbox to try out your vandalizing skills. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 17:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This is stupid.

We should not fill this place with free advertising for a website.

It needs to be cleaned and made encyclopedic.

This is just a promotional fan article, its too long and usefull, this isnt the place for that.

Its ridiculous to claim that its informative and not advertising when a bazillion links go to the other site and it goes into excrutiating detail, this is fancruft.

I need to make this article more NPOV by taking out some of the fan gushing. If you are here to promote an external site, you are violating policy here and must knock it off.

I havent been blanking anything, this article is just trivial spam about a nonnotable shitty website.

Its not blanking, this stupid article needs to be shorter and less usefull.

-RealityGuy

Since when Uncyclopedia meant to be a serious site? You want Million Dollar?!? 15:43, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Haha, free advertising. You think we're advertising for them just by having an article about them? News: They're not a money-making corporation. It would be like saying that writing an article about Google is advertising; it really isn't when anybody with a pulse who's left their house in the past decade already knows all about it and you couldn't possibly inform any more people. (NOTE: This is not an encyclopedia and hence doesn't need to be made encyclopedic. Retard.) Oddity 00:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

On your last point: This is a parody encyclopedia, and should still be in the style of an encyclopedia. Thank you, play again. —Hinoa talk.kun 00:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

On your last note: Emphasis on "parody", funny before substance, jackass. Unless the substance is funny, like period blood. Then you get a free pass.24.31.244.43 02:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I dont find this article funny at all.

Excellent. And now it is time to bring out everyone's favorite template {{sofixit}}

Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe the Wikipedia page needs improvement, please feel free to change it. You can edit almost any page on Uncyclopedia by just following the "Edit" link at the top of the page. We encourage you to write articles, since wikis like ours develop faster when everybody contributes. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in your userspace. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at AAN.

Also, you may want to log in, but it's not mandatory.

---

Please? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Wondering...

Are there any other Uncyclopedia parodies?

Not that I know of. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 21:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

WTF? Wikipedia isn't a parody!

Welcome to Uncyclopedia. On the other hand, maybe you're looking for Wikipedia. You're way too serious.--Faizaguo 18:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

"æ"

the thing "æ". Is a Norwegian letter. In Norway they have three more letters then in the UK or in the USA. The letters are æ, ø and å. These letters were made to fit the Norwegian talk. Æ is said: Eh.. Like eh.. what shall I do. I can't explain ø. Å is said: AUstralia. The first "word" in Australia. AU-stra-lia

 "sylable"; the first "sylable" in Australia.

Thank You for the Opportunity

Uncyclopedia is what the web was meant for. Uncyclopedia is the All, the One. It stands athwart (I'll look that up later) the Universe like a colossus, holding back the lies and misconceptions of Wikipedia. Plus, I get to be more of a creative writer, making this the most useful website in the net for me. I hope to become more involved. Thank you one and all, I hear the call, let's have a ball Jester 18:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

God, what the hell? Uncyclopedia lies!

You've lost it. Is there a Wikiasylum?--Faizaguo 18:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

wp is down today

LOL and I needed it for actual legitimate homework this time too! --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 14:32, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

It's never there when you need it. XD -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 21:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

?????

The line on the very top of the article only shows question marks (probably instead of some special characters) in firefox....

Good thing is that you got a firefox, all i got in ie7 beta is some undecoded crap like this: ¾­³É¹¦×¢²áÌìÍ Gspbeetle 08:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikiholic-lick it!

I had made article about addiction to wikipedia. Please see Wikiholic. Wondering about how could there are some people like it...Aditthegrat 12:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Anyone noticed???

Some IP is adding constant retarded stuff here and all over the site...if a admin sees this, please huff...and revert. But huff mostly. Demonbob 01:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

This is the IP 71.233.148.104 he's also got Buttsex among other articles!!! Demonbob 01:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision/Stream-line Idea

The portions of this article focusing on the wikipedians "edit scores" and other ridiculous habits of those silly fops could be moved to the article on wikipedians to streamline this article and add material with which to clutter further flesh out the wikipedians article. --Korian 04:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Can we put this in the wikipedia article

I was editing the wikipedia uncyclopedia article and I found editing note at the top:

I was editing the wikipedia article for uncyclopedia and it had an editing note that said this:

<!-- NOTE: If you were directed here from a message on your talk page to leave nonsense and jokes to Uncyclopedia, be aware that what you are editing right now is still Wikipedia - this is simply Wikipedia's article on Uncyclopedia. To add nonsense pages, please paste the following URL into your URL address bar: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Main_Page, and begin editing. -->

LOL Can we put this in the article!But reverse.--Scott 01:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)</nowiki>

Wow...

This article tell "Wikipedia people are fascists" in a whole lot of words! So unsubtly too that I have to wonder what's so good about it. Ah well, I'm in minority. -- 213.114.118.101 21:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Hitler quote

• Whats that supposed to mean? Thats no proper german.

new logo

I think the following logo is funny enough for inclusion in this article:

Anyone else's thoughts? Amdathlon65 22:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I like it --Micoolio101 03:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101

Good logo. AlexJohnc3 ^Complain F@H Fx2 15:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Its great. I love it! --TRB 16:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Love it!--Faizaguo 19:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

*crag* yes! Add it now! WackoMcGoose 22:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Encyclopedia Dramatica links

I have removed Encyclopedia Dramatica links because they were disrupting the spam filter. Please don't add them back, unless you know what you're doing. --Micoolio101 04:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101

How were they disrupting it exactly? AlexJohnc3 ^Complain F@H Fx2 15:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

At a guess I'd say stopping it from saving, but thats just a guess.--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 19:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. I removed them so the page can be edited mercilessly. --Micoolio101 01:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

omg

this page is just coppied of the uncylopedia page in wikipedia but they use... ok nevemind Its just plagiarzized which is not funny thats all...

So? What has Wikipedia ever done for us? --Micoolio101 01:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

They created mediawiki

You are stupid, right? The people that made this place made Wikipedia. And, without Wikipedia, I would get C's on my report for not finding info.

If you are somebody who has a flipping essay to do, Wikipedia is where you stealfind that information from.--Faizaguo 18:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Citizendium

Perhaps a mention of Citizendium would be in order?

{{Template:AoED}}

{{AoED}} should be needed inte article, so it would be good if someone added it...// 62.20.240.110 17:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Bouncing Logo

How do you put it in the corner instead of Sophia? Mr. Briggs Inc. 02:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?

Why is this page locked?

I have a very important contribution to make :) I wanna leave it as a surprise for those who actually edit here for cracks. Jfkll 00:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Its locked because this page is a target for vandalism, over and over and over again. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

You're a new user. Just wait for your account to settle in and this page should be available to you. --Micoolio101 ^{(whine • vandalism)} 05:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

humour

You spelled it wrong, that's why it doesn't show up. Its spelled humor! Ya dumb ---- Superbowlbound 17:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

English spelling is used. --—Braydie 17:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Excuse me, American spelling. Wikipedia is american, not British. Superbowlbound 21:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Excuse me. Wikipedia is international.--Faizaguo 18:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Finally

Someplace for jaded ex-Wiki users. My account was officially banned today from Wikipedia because I was disturbing the hive mind ;-) Guess I shouldn't have pointed out that the classical physics articles were all verbatim from a textbook. Now the admins at Wiki are deleting all the articles I've contributed over the last few years. I can hardly wait to add some facts to this article... Mandelbug 22:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't have thought that even in science section can happen such things. Strong edit warring is more typical for humanities. --Sourcerror 02:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Jesus Christ! YOU MORON! dont do that...

Russian Reversal

Russian Reversal Quote - in Soviet Russia, Wikipedia edits you!
We just need someone to put it in. Scalene 12:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I did add it today and someone accused me of quote spamming...
in Soviet Russia, spam quotes YOU!!!
rick 12:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I wanted to add a wise saying, but I didn't have the rights to edit the article yet: One man's fact is another man's POV. --Sourcerror 02:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Nazi Picture under History section

This picture is deeply offending to me and many others, please can I suggest it is removed --TRB 16:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

what a cry baby. 142.151.175.39 21:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

It IS Hitlerpedia.86.6.207.111 13:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I think it's funny. --Sourcerror 02:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

"What a cry baby." get a life, ok?

Image Caption

Bookstabbing image caption "But wikipedia is the enemy" should be replaced with "Wikipedia is not paper"

Comparison between Wikipedia and 1984

Maybe we can add the following to the article: This is a comparison of Wikipedia to Nineteen Eighty-Four.

1984	Wikipedia
Proles	Users and Anons
Outer party	Administrators
Inner party	Bureaucrats, Arbitration Committee
Big Brother	Jimbo Wales
Emmanuel Goldstein	Larry Sanger
Doublethink	Ignore all rules When convenient
Miniplenty	Requested Articles
Miniluv	Arbcom
Truthiness	There is no Cabal
Minipax	AIV
Eastasia	Baidu Baike
Eurasia	Encyclopædia Britannica
Memory hole	Speedy deletions
Newspeak	Manual of Style

What about "Newspeak"?--Faizaguo 18:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Done ;-) 69.233.94.189 22:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Enemies of the state

Daniel Brandt
Willy on Wheels
Thewolfstar
Hogeye
User:RJII
Anon Anon
Trolls pesky editors
Vandals pesky editors
Sockpuppets pesky editors

Pesky editors are usually editors that object to the Police state in Wikipedia and its similarity to an Orwellian State or they are often editors who try to get fact and neutrality into wiki aticles.

-- Emperor Walter Humala God save him!(God exists?) | wanna Talk? 23:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I like. But maybe fix the red links so it points to something else that's related. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Maybe mention that "trolling" is simply a synonym for criticism of Wikipedia. See this.

"Prophecy of the Messiah" links.

I was thinking that it would be nice if after the last appearance of the word "this" in this section, we could actually have a link for the fourth and fifth words after it. The fourth word, I'm not sure what to put for the link, but word five could have a 404 or something like that.

more INTERWIKI (th:)

th:วิเกรียนพีเดีย

Please add it, please. - th:User:Love Krittaya - Love Krittaya

I request it because this article is blocked in that time, but now it's unblock! So I can add it.
Am I get banned?
Yes! somebody in wigrianpedia hates me. - Love Krittaya 18:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

The One

"After which you will be required to select from the Internet 23 elitists, 16 female, 7 male, to rebuild Wikipedia."

The One tried to reason with the architecht that there are never more than 9.5 women even on the internet at any one time.

IHateWikipedia.com

As near as I can tell, the page is locked, so I'd like to ask the admins a question? I run a site called IHateWikipediaDOTcom. There's some humor, some criticism, and reviews. You'll see I even have some of your stuff there. I am also a noob WP editor, and just started a wiki on my home town called Westonka. As near as I can make, Wikia hosts your site and my Westonka site, which is a little ironic, with Beesley running it. If you read a some of the entries on the blog I also have, (which you can find on the main site) you'll see that I meet the definition of critic, but also believe WP is important. And let's not forget those Bomis Babes pictures I have on the site. So I am asking for a link on this page to my site. Thank you. Nanabozho 02:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Isnotisms

The little parenthetical responses in this section aren't funny (none of them) -Superbeecat 08:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia = The Borg???

Could someone with keys to the article add that the consipracy theory is true - Wikipedia is in fact the Borg Collective Assimilating Earthlings into the collective. Resistance is futile, you WILL be assimilated. Thankyou in advance for adding.--Smilehigh69 15:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Nominate this article for deletion

Speedy G4 Delete article and subject matter has no verifiable sources, and wikipedia itself is not notable. Does not fit into WP:BIO or FKU:STUPID. Unverifiable sources. Lacks proper formatting.--Smilehigh69 15:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

No can do. Wikipedia has Bad Jokes And Other Deleted Nonsense and Uncyclopedia hostage. 65.173.105.31 07:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

We should add the following quote

We should add this quote:

{Q|Wikipedia sucks PWNZ|Captain obvious, later editer by Jimbo Wales}

Simple English Wikipedia

Sort of off-topic but I have to know: WHaT'S WRoNG WITH SiMPlE ENGlISH WIKIPEDIA???????????????????????????????????????????? --71.76.62.9 21:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't diss wikipedia if i were you. You might think being a smart a** is the way to go but you are wrong . This website is funny indeed but you can't live off of laughter otherwise you'll suffocate and die. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.233.203 (talk • contribs)

This is the only IP on this page that has made a "real" comment. --AAA! (AAAA) 03:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Rewrite needed!

It seems as though the current version of this article is too listy. If anyone is willing to rewrite it, please do. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:33, October 14, 2007

Its missing the best quote ive seen yet!

"Wikipedia is a Massively Multiplayer Online Editing Game played by experts in redundancy, skepticism, pseudoscience, hyperlinking, reverting articles, demanding reliable sources, redundancy, verification, redundancy, identifying original research and initiating subtle flamewars over what is encyclopaedic."

That was the best thing about this article, did it have to be deleted when rewritten? =/

Suicidaman 11:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

ok..you guys know what..your just a group of loosers! if you cannot get to a point where you can be as good and useful to the world, you don't have to insult the people who actually are. We, here at wikipedia, try to help the world, unlike what you people do. Insulting us, is not getting you guys a higher status, or making you famous, and neither is it making us infamous. the world still turns to us for most of their queries, and i bet they get better solutions and answers than what you people give. the article about Wikipedia..is just one of the biggest looserish stunts the world has ever seen. If you have the brains, just think over it, or else LOOK UP THE ARTICLE ON RESPECT ON WIKIPEDIA. this could have been legal, except we care for the FIVE people who donated for this site and we don't want you bankrupt, on the streets, looking up on WIKIPEDIA what to do...

Actually, if you check the records, Wikipedia doesn't mind us. In fact, both of these sites are technically owned by Jimmy Wales. --AAA! (AAAA) 21:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Also, the point of this site isn't to be informative. If you gave a shit enough to read 3 seconds worth of our own policies, you'd notice we're doing things for fun. We don't plan to get famous, as you suggest in your post, though nobody at Wikipedia really has any heightened fame, save for Jimmy Wales, and that's pretty much just on the internet. We're here to write comedy. You don't criticize the comedians on your TV do you? Yes? Well then, please revert yourself to this link anyways. -RAHB 19:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

"loosers"?????Get your facts straight!!!!--Faizaguo 18:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

How to put new logo

How do you change the logo in the top left hand corner?

Editing

Why can't this article be edited? I thought of a good wikipedia is not: "Wikipedia is not bringing sexyback, despite what justin timberlake thinks" 117.102.60.249 20:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Redundancy

I object to this listing of Wikipedia characteristics. There is no link to redundancy within the text. As in (See also: Redundancy)

Discworld Everywhere!!!

This page should reference the fact that 96% of all Wikipedia pages have a reference to Terry Pratchett's "Discworld" series of novels - a number which grows every day.

Resistance is futile. Join the movement. We shall rule Wikipedia. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Do I have to keep saying this? --AAA! (AAAA) 23:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia makes me sick.yes to me it is a filthy hideous fool intoxacted Area.Zim says it is slime.It is a moronic creatonise Wiki.Demons created this pork cow of a website.I rather gobble down my own crap then join those horrible nazi idiots.I am Zim!Zim is me!

Kiwipedia

I wanted to add, to the "confused with" section:

150

Kiwipedia, the fruity encyclopedia. --Eliyak 01:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I love that idea!--Faizaguo 18:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

god, i wish i had photoshop.. hit it with a hammer nao 20:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Question, bouncing logo

Hi there, here's Sgt pepper from the Dutch Oncyclopedie. I have a small question about this page. How did you guys but teh bouncing wiki logo over the original puzzle patato? Sgt pepper 16:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

CSS trickery. I won't profess to know how it all fits together, but this page's code is here. –—Hv (talk) 6/02 18:07

Thanks Heerenveen.... Dutch ^-^ ? Anyway, I'm trying it on our site... good thing i'm an admin there because it's mediawiki... Sgt pepper 21:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete this article

I have some doubts about the notability of this. Yes, Wikipedia parodies Uncyclopedia, very funny, but it doesn't strike me as very significant. Uncyclopedia is an encyclopedia, not a repository of all facts in the world ever. Let's delete the article on Wikipedia per WP:N. I mean UN:N. I don't know what I mean. Just do it. --Syndrome 03:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

First you feature Wikipedia, then you go to wikipedia and delete Wikipedia. They wanted to feature Uncyclopedia and tried to delete Uncyclopedia itself.! 65.163.112.114 01:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

It looks like you succeeded: Wickedpedia returns 8,260 Google hits, but n o t o n e o f t h e m is to the www. site.Kdammers 00:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Where is the image

Or grues marching with the Wikipedia logo in a nazi-like fashion?

Logo

The "For those without comedic tastes, the so-called experts at Wikipedia think they have an article about Themselves." box really needs a "Dorks!" behind the last word. Also, this article is gay unconventional for being protected. Cheers from downunder. Ingolfson 04:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

"Dorks!" at the end? I don't think so. --AAA! (AAAA) 12:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

communopedia

Is it just me or is the "wikipedia is communist" stuff not really funny and overstated?

What Wikipedia is

A cult who thrive to recreate a paper encyclopedia online. Gbing 14:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Wow

And to think this used to be funny, I'm ashamed.

lol

hey, should we put a link to this:

[[1]]

wikipedia is not

i think we should add wikipedia is not your father, to the list or we can add wikipedia is not your uncle joe.

Jimbo Wales

lol. I think you should interchange Barry with Jimbo. And jimbo has no prior explanation. Zheliel 05:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is funny as shit: How babies get "gut flora" from mom's SHIT.

Courtesy of Wikipedia.org/gut flora (from mother's SHIT). - <<Acquisition of gut flora in human infants (by mama's SHIT). The gastrointestinal tract of a normal fetus is sterile. During birth and rapidly thereafter, bacteria from the mother and the surrounding environment colonize the infant's gut. Immediately after vaginal delivery, babies have bacterial strains in the upper gastrointestinal tract derived from the mothers’ feces.[14] Infants born by caesarean section may also be exposed to their mothers’ microflora, but the initial exposure is most likely to be from environmental microbes such as the air, other infants, and the nursing staff which serve as vectors for transfer.[15] The primary gut flora in infants born by cesarean delivery may be disturbed for up to 6 months after birth whereas vaginally born infants take up to 1 month for their intestinal micro flora to be well established. After birth, environmental, oral and cutaneous bacteria are readily transferred from the mother to the infant through suckling, kissing, and caressing. All infants are initially colonized by large numbers of E. coli and streptococci. Within a few days, bacterial numbers reach 108 to 1010 per gram of feces.[15][16] During the first week of life, these bacteria create a reducing environment favorable for the subsequent bacterial succession of strict anaerobic species mainly belonging to the genera Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Ruminococcus.[17] Breast-fed babies become dominated by bifidobacteria, possibly due to the contents of bifidobacterial growth factors in breast milk.[18] In contrast, the microbiota of formula-fed infants is more diverse with high numbers of Enterobacteriaceae, enterococci, bifidobacteria, Bacteroides, and clostridia.[19][20] After the introduction of solid food and weaning, the microflora of breast-fed infants becomes similar to that of formula-fed infants. By the second year of life the fecal microflora resembles that of adults.>>

Uncyclopedia - Wikipedia

This article used to be actually funny, when the summary in the beginning was actually a copy of the wikipedia's article about the uncyclopedia.

It has much more style and humour than the current one.

"Uncyclopedia, "the content-free encyclopedia", is a satirically themed wiki. Founded in 2005, it is formatted as a humorous parody of Wikipedia and aims ultimately to satirize all encyclopedic subjects. Originally an English-language wiki, the project currently spans over 50 languages. The English version has over 23,000 pages of content."

So what about changing it back to something like:

Wikipedia, "the free satiryclopedia", is a satirically themed wiki. Founded in 2001, it is formatted as a humorous parody of Uncyclopedia and aims ultimately to satirize all subjects. Originally a displeasing wiki, the project currently spans over 50 different forms of humor. The English version has over 2,700,000 pages of satire.

Feel free to improve this, it is only a rough suggestion to get some style back into this article.

Yoda's comment

Worse than Wikipedia, you cannot get.

What ever happened to this quote?

There used to be a really clever and funny quote on this article saying: "Wikipedia is accurate.(citation needed)" -Wikipedia on Wikipedia