Talk:John Madden

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to John Madden. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

This article lacks a lot of hilarity. How old was the writer of this? Tboger

I thought it was fairly decent. The quotes are pretty funny and the references to Tough Actin' Tinactin. Other then that, the rap career and whatnot are pretty fucking retarded. Him being listed as Himself in Elder Scrolls is pretty funny. EmoAddict15

I laughed my ass off. You have to know John Madden. I added the Favre stuff by the way. Quadzilla99 22:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Rewrite

I rewrote this whole article and pasted it here. Hopefully this one is, you know, funny.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

I a bit too lazy to actually review this, so I'll just say that you could do a lot with a few quotes at the top. There are so many JM quotes out there--real quotes--that are funnier than anything anyone could write!

See, here's a guy that when he runs, he goes faster. Barcode711 20:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Where'd all the funnay go?

This article used to be good, now it lacks quotes among other John Madden oddities.

Quotespam isn't funny, it's annoying and detracts from the article.--Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

You're 14 years old, you don't know funny.

Perhaps, friend, you should try to keep a more open mind, and perhaps not take it so personally that I deleted your quotes. It's not personal at all. The previous article seriously lacked humor, and thus I fixed it a little. I'm sorry if that disappoints you.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Remember when Ljlego became the person with the 4th most features on the site only 3 months later? Some 14 year old, he should be busy being juvenile with the rest of them! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey look! I'm using the talk page! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:35 Sep 11, 2007

Shoot guys, as it turns out, I'm a meatpuppet. Sorry. The five FA's were just a front. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:43 Sep 11, 2007

How about creating an Unquotable page for Mr. Madden? Realdeal 55 17:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

I found them pretty funny. I was reverted though. Quadzilla99 20:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I re-inserted them. I'm sorry but if you think that other page was funny, you should just stop editing here. Quadzilla99 12:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

It was fairly funny, however people keep removing the funny elements without commenting. I like how Ljlego ruined it then said he fixed it--that was good for a laugh. Quadzilla99 02:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Quotespam isn't funny. Quit adding quotes to it. --General Insineratehymn 02:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Insin is right, and Lj is funny. See here for that consensus, if you'd like proof. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:41, Sep 11, 2007

I guess myself and two other users are incorrect then, thanks for finally commenting here. The article sucks like hell now btw. It couldn't make me laugh if I was high on Angel Dust, PCP, and huffing large amounts of laughing gas. Oh well. Quadzilla99 02:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

So you think that adding quotes will automatically make it funny? --General Insineratehymn 02:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Guys, guys, look. I'm personally going to say that I take pride in my article. I take pride in all the work that I do. I don't like to pull the "I have 18 FA's" card, because it's asinine. But you're not being fair here. Three users does not a consensus make. In fact, from all of the users that have posted on this userpage, assuming they all like it, plus the two reviews I got saying it was better than the page, make seven users. Which is, by the way, more than three. So please stop trying to insult me, because it's not going to work. And, as an aside, being high on Angel Dust and PCP while simultaneously ingesting large amounts of Nitrous Oxide would probably cause you to die.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Obviously you've never tried it. I do think it's funny as is, however I don't think a couple quotes at the top of an article that DON'T involve Oscar Wilde can add humor. Great job on the article, though. -El Jefé de Pancho 05:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

From Pee Review

Humour:	8	Funny, I guess.
Concept:	7	good enough
Prose and formatting:	7	Quite good
Images:	8	Most of the images are kinda irrelevant.
Miscellaneous:	5	I laugh in the face of miscellaneous.
Final Score:	35	I liked it.
Reviewer:	» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 07:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

From Pee Review 2

Any more?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	5	Feels a bit Captain Obviousish to me, although not terribly bad... probably a bit over done in that respect and it feels a bit samey.
Concept:	7	Well.. you've got to write about it you know... mocking the game series would also be a good idea I reckon
Prose and formatting:	8	Flows ok, formatting and grammar is fine, so structurally it's sound.
Images:	6	Some are a bit questionable, but they're tarting up the article at least.
Miscellaneous:	6	an overall 6 out of 10 for the misc rating, definitely worthy of a tarting up.
Final Score:	32
Reviewer:	-- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 03:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)