Forum:VFB
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > VFB
Note: This topic has been unedited for 3876 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Vote for Bureaucrats. Whoever thinks we need new bureaucrats, vote. I think. — 00:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Vote.
Score: 1
- For. — 00:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- Limp boner. - What well need first in terms of users getting user rights changed will be admins. And we won't need more admins in the next few weeks. Although, activity is kicking up. But we need much more activity and/or edits and/or vandals for new admins.-- 00:31, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- Since only admins can decide wether we need more admins or not ... shouldn't beaurocrats decide if the site needs beaurocrats or not? It's only fair. --ShabiDOO 00:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- What we need is more writers. -- The Zombiebaron 00:40, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- Against. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 17:48, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, strong against on the new writer bit. I want to fill the visible part of the site with my own rants. Style Guide 10:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
- What the site needs is bearocrats. Not because I'm a furry. Because I'm not. And anyway, my furry costume, which I don't have, is a raccoon, not a bear. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:58, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- Against. We technically only need 1 bureaucrat. We have 3 active. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:32, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- sinkhole vagoo No new admins / crats needed for a looooong time. Madclaw @ talk 20:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- I still don't know how to spell beauraucrat. -RAHB 08:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- No. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Frosty is correct. Obviously. Obviously all Unyc admins are completely equal. The "power" structure is completely flat and crats just happen to have a tool which they are only allowed to use when they have massive community consensus. So, we only need 1. Mordillo is back. That means we have loads of crats and so obviously dont need any more. However that said, we should make MadMax a crat anyway. Do I need to put a case now? Um? Ok... He is the greatest Uncylopedian of all time. Um... He has NEVER upset any user ever? He hardly ever says anything, but when he does everyone listens. He's an insane road warrior. You all know he should be, and it's kinda a bit silly that he's not. Also, note to RAHB: I don't try and spell "beaurocrat". Just type "crat". MrN 02:38, Mar 10
- Dammit, I suck cocks. That is infallible. 'Crat MadMax immediately! -RAHB 03:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- The only structure is an informal admin cabal heirarchy, which is almost entirely based on merit. For the most part, there's essentially no structure, just respect of opinions in certain areas and for specific skills. However, for reasons I have never entirely grasped (particularly after becoming one), 'crats recieve a certain amount of additional respect within wiki communities... 2013.03.11.03:06
Against. I think that as a Judeo-Christian society we should be following the fundamental laws that built us, and stoning women who claim to be virgins but in fact aren't is built into biblical law. Nominally Humane! 10:37 10 MarAbstaining. Nominally Humane! 12:37 13 Mar- For. For MadMax Aleister sometime on 15-3-'13
I can do the VANdaL PART LOLOLOL
-- Style Guide 18:04, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Subvote, if it's actually necessary, to 'crat MadMax
Score: 14
- Because obviously. -RAHB 03:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- he's less gay than Zombiebaron ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:10, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- For. Obviously. MrN 03:14, Mar 10
- For. Why not if he wants it. -- Style Guide 07:25, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- 4 — 07:41, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- Fuck Crating, make him the pope! ~ 13:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'm with Mordillo! Make him poop! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:04, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- For the symbolism. However, it isn't really much better than being an Admin. The only thing it gives you beyond Admin is the ability to add/remove user rights. If this really goes anywhere, I'd love to have the honour of adding the flag. 2013.03.11.02:51
- Sure, but he won't know about it for a couple of months, and only then when he categorizes the crat page and see his name on it. Aleister 12:23 11-3-'13
Isn't this vote an exercise in futility? While I'd likely vote for the road warrior for burrocrat, I still don't see a need for one. Nominally Humane! 12:32 11 MarOn second thought, For. Nominally Humane! 12:36 13 Mar- For. Per RAHB, MrN, Al, and all--Funnybony 20:05, Mar 14
- For. - Because you are all faggots. MadMax is completely straight. And if we're cratting MadMax, then we should totally hold a vote on opping Shabidoo. 21:40 3.14.13
- For. --EMC [TALK] 18:57 Mar 15 2013
- Bandwagon boner Helen Keller 19:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
(User rights log); 19:11 . . Dawg (talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:MadMax from autoconfirmed user, rollback and administrator to autoconfirmed user, rollback, administrator and bureaucrat (I remember when you were just an anonymous IP. No user right change has ever meant more to me. Congratulations, MadMax!)
Awesome. MrN 00:26. Mar 16. 2013
Op Shabidoo
Score: 2
- N+ CUMMING BONAH - Give this Shaba-daba-doo a chance! 21:39 3.14.13
- This boner and your ejaculation is getting kind of old- give it a chance ---— 21:52:35 2013/03/15 UTC
I don't want to be an admin. Sign up for happymonkey and ill be very happy. --ShabiDOO 23:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- Already did. You are my long lost brother. Come on, it's not like you actually have to do anything. Look at all the other admins, they're lazy too. 23:57 3.15.13