Forum:The Shocking New Slut List (now with no-nudity!)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > The Shocking New Slut List (now with no-nudity!)
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6202 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

It is time once again to veiw those of use who have many links to their userpage, and to comment upon the meaning of it all.
admins are in bold

1. Todd Lyons (4,835 links)
2. Mhaille (2,349 links)
3. Spang (1,153 links)
4. Codeine (892 links)
5. Rcmurphy (723 links)
6. Zombiebaron (662 links)
7. Hinoa (640 links)
8. MoneySign (611 links)
9. Ghelae (514 links)
10. Keitei (479 links)
11. Nintendorulez (466 links)
12. Bradaphraser (464 links)
13. Dawg (444 links)
14. Carlb (440 links)
15. Chronarion (431 links)
16. Savethemooses (427 links)
17. Hindleyite (375 links)
18. Hrodulf (363 links)
19. Rataube (354 links)
19. Gwax (354 links)
20. Nerd42 (344 links)

Comments

  • Tarts -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)
  • I hate this list because I'm so low on it. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 20:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I could point out the obvious pattern that the boldness shows...and the unbold people...but I won't...cause that would be like flaming my ego. --The Zombiebaron 20:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Welcome wagon users are cheaters. As always. —rc (t) 20:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I have articles pasted directly on my page. Mainly deleted ones that were too short to keep but were personally hilarious. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Oh well, back to randomly inserting my name in Wikilinks. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:06, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • No-nudity? Awwww... --User:Nintendorulez 21:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I'd again like to thank everyone who made this possible, because I've certainly done little recently. Though (and RC should be pleased) I've also not been "cheating" by welcoming new users to the site.  ;) ~ T. (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh yes, your total is completely legit. :p —rc (t) 23:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh come now, let's not fight. Sit down. I'll make you a cup of tea. ~ T. (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
No.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • How the hell am I on there? I've only ever welcomed about five users. And I didn't think I talked that much. I have a feeling someone else has linked me in their sig. And when I find the slut that did it... • Spang • ☃ • talk • 07:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Missed out again. I blame that guy! --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 11:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 893. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Uh-oh, if I'm not careful, I'll be off the list. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 14:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Nah, you can just make the list longer, I did so when I was in the 24th place.---Asteroid B612B612.jpg (aka Rataube) - Ñ 15:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, but then I'd have to be a little less lazy than I am. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 16:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm willing to help you out, gwax. Here, respond to this comment with something witty.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Woohoo!/w00t!/[insert other n00bish celabratory phrase here]! I'm #9! I'm higher than most of the main bureaucrats! Hey, I'm HIGHER UP THAN THE SITE'S FOUNDER! not that it's much to be proud about. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
*sigh* I remember when I passed chron. --The Zombiebaron 22:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Woah, I passed Chron, too.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Currently, BENSON only has 106 links to his userpage. However, if you add a link to his userpage to you're sig, that number will go up (and maybe even get him onto the "Most linked to" list). --The Zombiebaron 23:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Done. BENSON will get some attention, but not enough to satisfy his greatness. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • How the heck did I get up to #12? I haven't been using the welcome template at all.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm 4x more confused about how I got to #3. Most of the pages that Special:Mostlinked says link to my page don't have any links to mine on them at all! Though curiously, most do seem to have Tompkins' sig on them, but his sig doesn't have a link to my page either... • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
I do remember Tompkins' sig being exactly like yours, but being green and still linking to your page. Hmmm... --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb.png MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 08:00, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Maybe it has to do with linking to your talkpage? I think that counts in this prostitution competition.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Nah, the talk pages are all further down the list. And my talk page isn't linked on tompkins' sig either. Sannse was confused by it too. Perhaps it's just a glitch in the matrix... • Spang • ☃ • talk • 19:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
We've beaten the system, finally. HOMESTAR ME!!! TURTLE ME!!! t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 21:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I should try linkspamming talking on the forums more --Roger The Bum Full sig!

<a href="http://rdoger6424.jaywebdesigns.com/recipient.php">psychotomimetic</a>

CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 19:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Or create a totally invisible link in everyone's nickname templates... not that I'm condoning such actions... --Olipro Icons-flag-gb.png Anchor KUN (Harass) 21:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
And also, the reason you can't get past 1,000 is because there are only 1,000 items on the list. Hence "Most Linked To". --The Zombiebaron 21:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
I came a little late to this party, it seems. As for what it means, I have no idea ^^; --Hrodulf 10:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Somewhere around 80-90. Swordmaster 19:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Old, Used-Up Slut Lists

Retrieved from "https://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Forum:The_Shocking_New_Slut_List_(now_with_no-nudity!)&oldid=1200795"