User talk:Puppy/Archive to make Lyrithya happy

Rules

1. All headers must be written so that each word is preceded by a capital letter and no spaces, and the third and second last words must be OnThe
2. Anything else is fair game.

RapeOnThePage

rape rape rape. HAHAHA!!! (talk) 07:20, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Giving the dog a bone? Pup 07:26 04 Mar '11

Yep. And safely too. (talk) 07:30, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

HuhOnTheHuh?

Seriously, huh? 1234 ~ 16:13, 4 March 2011

You'reAWinnerOnTheForum

Per Forum:The Great Administrator Mixup: Vote for your temporary admins here, you now have admin powers for the duration of March. DON'T MESS UP I MEAN IT. —rc (t) 18:09, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

I promise to use my powers for the good of all. Assuming that by all we refer to all antipodean users that are named after diminutive canines and technological advances of the 20th century. Pup 11:57 06 Mar '11

I'mHereALotOnThePage

For some reason. Anyway, Grats on winning a temp admin thingy. I came here to ask you if you could do this because it seems to have coding troubles (which I know little about, but I hear you are a coding.) but seeing as you have better things to do now you probably can't. So uh, yeah...why am I writing this? (talk) 20:38, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

I'm a tad busy, but I'll have a look at it soonish. Still trying to finish off my latest article. Pup 11:57 06 Mar '11

SoYouHaveOfThePowersOnTheBan

follow them. Do not enter the role. Watch out Don't follow them, You told them to. So if you powers the Admin, you can turn on the system, and roll the wheel who knows? Maybe you'll learn the secret for yourself. - LOL vandalz

私にあなたの親族に従うと、トレッドのIFが動作しないのはしないことを引っ張らない出番管理者はあなたが死んでしまうフォロー - LOL vandalz

MilkOnTheTurn

Like yoghurt? Everyone likes yoghurt. God himself loves Yoghurt. As guns was firing his final shot, his proclaim to the sack was That he like yoghurt. 83 of them, to be precise. The yoghurt and the liver of the general is 72. He booms on them all, and Julius Caesar. There ain't know yoghurt when your dead, which is why people aren't successful when there dead.

- LOL vandalz

I have gone through most of the Karma Sutra, so yes, I am fond of yoghurt. Pup 11:57 06 Mar '11

DogPoopOnTheBoard

Oh, great. Now you'll go around thinking you're top dog or something. SonOfABitchOnTheSite. (Seriously, congrats!) WhyDoINeedToProvideThisOnThePage 06:11, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

Which is so different from how I acted before in what way?

You didn't sign your post. You should ban yourself. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  03:14, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

SoYou'reNowAnAdminOnTheSite

Makes sense because you make a good admin, you're not all serious and grumpy. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:27, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

No, I'm well known for being easy going and- Hang on. You didn't follow the rules of this talk page. BANBANBAN! Pup 11:47 06 Mar '11

IMadeThisOnTheComputer

Uncyclopedia_talk:Imperial_Colonization/6#IMadeThisOnTheComputer King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  04:16, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

VoteOnTheDeletion

Hey, mon, when a thing on VFD doesn't have a clear outcome (as in, definitely a VFDable thing with no votage majority on either side), it'd be nice if you could wait a little longer before closing it. A day is the established minimum with votes, but if folks can't make up their minds, it's usually safer to leave it for a few more, you know?

Also, if you do close something, even if you do decide to archive it yourself, could you please still use the {{VFDc}} template and leave a comments that it was, indeed, kept - this isn't just for the poopsmiths, but also for anyone who cares to look through the archive later, as normally only the deleted ones don't have those. Makes it a lot easier to sort out more quickly what the outcome actually was, and stuff, especially after a couple of years have passed and everything has passed into deep histories.

Also also, the date on the {{oldvfd}} isn't when it was closed, but when it was nominated, just for future reference. 1234 ~ 19:21, 7 March 2011

I am responding in reverse, because that's the way I roll. I just did the 5 tilde trick for the date - didn't even think about it until after it had saved, and then figured a day here or there isn't going to matter.

I did look quickly for the {{VFDc}}, but got sidetracked and forgot to change it later.

And near even scores with 7 or 8 votes in suggests that even though I see no redeemable, others obviously do. Given that it's about a sub-culture that I have almost no knowledge of, I figured it probably has more appeal amongst gamers. Pup 09:53 07 Mar '11

Well, the date makes more of a difference if the thing is left longer before being closed, as they usually are. Thing is, the discussion isn't just about voting - people often work on the articles while they're there, and people's minds have been changed by reasonable discourse in the past. Take it down too quickly, and the chance of that is pretty much lost and nothing comes of the nomination at all. 1234 ~ 17:50, 8 March 2011

WhileWe'reOnTheThing

Frosty nominated Call of Duty: Black Ops and I called the nomination invalid as the article already had {{ICU}}. You declared the vote settled and removed it from VFD, apparently without archiving it. The problem is that Sycamore asked Frosty to read the rulebook and I, trying to clarify Sycamore's remarks, could find nothing to point to. The fact that a nomination was invalid doesn't mean it shouldn't be archived. Cheers. Spıke ¬ 12:46 8-Mar-11

Well, removing invalid noms isn't that big of a deal, as if they're invalid, not terribly much point in archiving them. This one is a little fuzzier, as it wasn't so much invalid as just that it shouldn't have been nominated... if that's even a distinction. Can be nice to archive some of them them so that a precedent stands for future reference should other folks want to look and see what happens, but that would only work if said folks would look at the examples in the archive before doing things. Yes, I mean you. PotR, seriously, please look at how to do these things before charging ahead and doing them; the {{VFDc}} goes on the title. Look at the examples. Please, it's all there in the archive. If that doesn't help, you can also ask; there are two perfectly good poopsmiths, both of which tend to be a good deal more polite than the other one, who makes a practice of nagging everyone to death, but I suspect any of them would be willing to help. 1234 ~ 17:45, 8 March 2011

The distinction isn't a criterion, because any time there is a conversation, people might want to point to it after the fact. That doesn't depend on how invalid the conversation was. Spıke ¬ 20:26 8-Mar-11

Oh, and one more thing.

*explodes* 1234 ~ 19:25, 8 March 2011

It would have been lovely if, when I realized I put the VFDc in the wrong place and then moved it to archive that the stupid SOB thing had actually saved the way I had wanted it too. Pup 07:48 08 Mar '11

Actually, it's fun making you explode. While I have your attention, which parses quicker? Svg or gif? Have a few images that are only 3-6 colours, including transparency, that are currently saved as png, but they're taking longer to download then I would like. I want to speed it up but I seem to recall that Svg has to parse to png as part of wikimedia, so trying to work out what would be the least data size/parsing required to get the same effect. Pup 08:01 08 Mar '11

Bloody hellfire.

I made a mistake when I didn't save. Okay?

Pup 08:35 08 Mar '11

Well, do it right next time. Okay?

Oh, and if it's a few-colours image, a gif would probably be best, assuming you don't have complexical transparency and/or intention to scale them... gifs partly compress by colours, so should be pretty small, though. Dunno about svg, but aye, using it through the software here will yield a png anyway. Can directly link it, but then there be browser compatibility issues... 1234 ~ 21:18, 8 March 2011

By complexical I assume you mean semi-transparent. In this case no. In relation to compressing, I'm going to index the colours, so this should minimize file size. (User:PuppyOnTheRadio/Lego is where the current images are, btw.) I have files at the size I want, or at least if I redo them they will be, so parsing the size won't impact either, and there's no animation involved - or at least not as I currently envisage it. Svg would be ideal if it were linked from outside, but as you say, browser issues, and I don't trust the way that mediawiki parses them anyway. Gif sounds like a winner. Unless, of course, you have a better idea upon seeing the images. (I'm going to tweak them to have the angled lines look more lime lines as well. The software I used to create the originals is not the best image editor, but was the best to create the models I wanted.) Also have a question about POV-ray though. Ever used it? Any idea how to change from a perspective view to an orthographic view? Pup 01:18 09 Mar '11

The edges do weird things when scaled and reindexed, and gif doesn't support semitransparency at all, but anyhow... and I've never heard of the thing. 1234 ~ 05:19, 9 March 2011

CouldYouMoveToMainSpace

I'm glad you have protected User:Another n00b/Edit this page!!. Could you move it to mainspace? also could add the category Category:Self-reference, Category:Things you will never have and Category:Epic Fail to it and can you make the Protection permanent? (for the joke) - LOL vandalz

Hmmm. Don't know about that. I'd probably use the {{noediting}} to keep the joke, but I wouldn't protect it as such unless it becomes a consistent vandal magnet. I'd also be looking at fleshing it out - creating fake section edits that direct to Epic Fail or something similar, and adding text to it as to why you shouldn't be editing. Make it something like Why?: You shouldn't edit this page. As it stands it's a cute one liner, but I don't normally like cute one liners in main space without having something that makes it really stand out. Pup 09:37 11 Mar '11

FeatureCreditForScienceFictionOnTheBarbie

I realized your thoughts should really be posted on the IC talk page. Otherwise, people who contributed may never see them. Because I'm such a helpful person (read P.I.T.A.), I started it for you at Uncyclopedia_talk:Imperial_Colonization#Feature_Credit_on_Science_fiction King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:15, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

CalmDownOnTheBanning

Secretly I was always hoping to have an excuse to write something on your talkpage just for the header conventions alone. But anyway.

What's up with the itchy trigger finger on Another n00b? From what I see all he did was mistakenly edit out a redlink. Even a day seems pretty excessive for that, and week bans are really pretty harsh. He came on IRC tonight to plead his case, and while I personally don't think he needs to be banned for such a really minor thing, I wouldn't be so rude as to unban him out from under you. But I do ask you to reconsider. 24 hours is kind of an awful long time for a stupid mistake; that kind of duration is usually reserved for something serious like disrupting voting procedures.

I realize I might only be hearing half the story here, so again, I leave it up to you. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 09:21 Mar 12, 2011

He did something similar in the past where he decided to delete an entire talk topic off his talk page as he didn't like where it was going. I told him at that time not to do it again, and he did. He also has edited user pages in the past that aren't his, which he was asked not to do, and then did it again, and that got him an hour long ban. I figure a longer ban was in order to let him know that it wasn't appreciated, and so I dealt it. No idea how much longer is left on it, but I'm happy to bow to the wilisdom of older admins. Short story is I want him to behave, and a slap in the face is sometimes a short, sharp object lesson. Pup 12:35 12 Mar '11

"He also has edited user pages in the past that aren't his"... I'd just like a moment to sigh really heavily and reflect upon the irony of that statement in an Uncyclopedia where apparently that shit doesn't matter anymore. Maybe I'll make another post in that forum. Anyway.

I kind of suspected there might have been a repeat-offense thing going on here, which is why I didn't unban him. Since it is a repeated offense I can see how you'd get irritated at him doing it yet again. So yeah, in that case I'd say the day block is justified, and if he does it again, it's a week, but make sure to lurk on IRC now and again to see if he'd like to talk it out. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:55 Mar 12, 2011

ThankYouForResurrectingMeOnTheSite

I can't describe how happy I am. Thank you so much. I've learned my lesson, and now You've cured my Bat Fuck Insanity. Again thanks for resurrecting me! - LOL vandalz

RandomOccurenceOfTheDay

I had finally reached the final dungeon of Final Fantasy I. Unfortunately, I didn't make it to the end. Then I learned some new spells, and I still could make it to the end. Then I got this really awesome sword, and I STILL couldn't make it to the end. Guess that's what fighting 5 admins bosses will do to you. You can't beat 'em, and you can't join 'em. You can only go eat shit, like a fucker. --Scofield 12:53, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

I wonder about that, as well as beginning to wonder about the way we vote on admins for the site. I honestly don't think that I make a good admin simply due to lack of time here as well as not really looking at off-site stuff such as IRC, UnSkype, Facebook or any other things of that ilk. So having me as admin seems a little odd. However, being an admin is like having Ultima, along with MP rage, autolife, and ultimate weapons for all party members - something which you need to defeat the dark aeons in FFX, so I'm assuming it's the same for FFI. Pup 01:22 14 Mar '11

I would personally love to be an admin. Mainly for all the joke-banning and giving insulting reasons for huffing articles on QVFD. --Scofield 13:54, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

HelpOnTheZergRushGame

The invasion system won't work properly!--JordonOng 17:27, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

I've been a little busy in RL, but happy to have a look at some stage. What is it supposed to do? (I can probably work it out, but I'm short on time). Pup 01:51 16 Mar '11

Rather weird little Game (0_o) . - くそったれ Talk contrib 15:24, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

CobraEatsKid

I just wanted to make a title. --~  13:28, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

SexOnTheBed

Per Mimo. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 18:56, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

On a bed? Oh, man... you're doing it all wrong. 1234 ~ 18:58, 16 March 2011

Its called an elevator. ---I have a talking zombie 19:39, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

SexInTheElevator

Per the above. ---I have a talking zombie 20:16, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Ah - classic 80's rock references FTW. (BTW, from personal experience I can assure you it's not as exciting as you would imagine.) Pup 08:26 17 Mar '11

...thats a song? Lol, didn't know. Well, back to SexInTheFridge. ---I have a talking zombie 20:30, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Try sex in the tumble dryer - cramped but oddly fun. Pup 08:37 17 Mar '11

Cool. ---I have a talking zombie 20:42, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

HeyWeNeedThisToBeOnTheSite

I'm thoroughly impressed how accurate articles such as Command line and YTMND are to the source material. We
need an article on Something Awful. Also could you make it look like the website? I'd nom it for VFH if you did it in that Vain. Thanks for listening. - LOL vandalz 11:33, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

I'll think about it. Pup 03:04 19 Mar '11

I would genuinely VFH it if you did. Especially if it was over-dramatised on characteristics. - LOL vandalz 15:12, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, but unless I actually get inspired to create content it will be a good looking but crap article. But I will definitely consider it. There may be some merit to the idea if I can flesh it out enough. Have another project on the go at the moment though. Pup 03:25 19 Mar '11

YourPictureOnTheInterwebs

This is you yes?

(talk) 05:30, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, although the monocle is only an affectation. Pup 05:36 20 Mar '11

OyOnTheRules

Um... did you have a reason for banning Dexter? 1234 ~ 00:12, 21 March 2011

Dickishness relating to VFD. Moot point. Pup 06:21 21 Mar '11

SeeingAsNoOneWillRespondToMeOnTheRaptors

I've decided to take this into my own hands, I'm going to move Dinosaur into mainspace at ten fourty-five EST tomorrow. Anyone who wants to make their final edits can do so within that time frame. Thanks. -- 14:48, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Respond where? But yeah, you do the thing to the thing. Pup 07:29 21 Mar '11

Uncle Puppy, you might want to check the Dinosaur discussion page. There's at least one issue there you had a strong opinion about. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  07:36, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

HaHaOnTheTubes!

Your Youtube channel has only 285 upload views!! X3 - LOL vandalz 19:16, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

And only one video, that was put there to be linked here. Actually, you've probably spent more time looking at my YouTube channel than I have. Pup 08:09 22 Mar '11

Fair enough. It must be a single-serving user. - LOL vandalz 20:21, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, and read the rules. Pup 08:38 22 Mar '11

TheRulesOfTheTopOnThePage? - LOL vandalz 20:47, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

MyBestPerformanceOnTheVFH

I remember the time you told me, "stop trying to get featured. The best writers are those who simply try to make others laugh." I heeded your advice, and stopped self-nomming. However, after my UnScripts:Superman's first adventure got an encouraging Pee Review, I finally decided to try again. And it is quite easily my best performance out there, so far. A 5.5 score, and no "against" votes. (though Hyperbole did abstain). Anyways, this may not last for long. My nomination is likely to be cut down by a sudden barrage of against votes or be removed due to low health. Anyways, you might want to check the article out, and see if it's worth it or not. Either you'll initiate the barrage of "Against" votes, or increase the score by 1, or abstain. Either way, do what you think is right, and please don't accuse me of vote-whoring. --Scofield 13:28, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

WritingCompetitonOnTheGloriousEnclcyolpedia

Are you interested in signing up for the contest? |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill | 08:09, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Your heading doesn't follow the rules exactly! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  18:29, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

DidYouGetToBeGrouchoOnTheJob?

Well, did you? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  18:16, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, hence my sudden absence from the site. Anyone want a car loan? Pup 08:08 01 Apr '11

Congrats on the job; condolences on not being here more. Of course I should talk. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:58, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

YouPeeReviewedDinosaurSomewhereOnTheSite

I'm too lazy to look for it, but wanted to see it again. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  18:28, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Wasn't me. I put it up for review about 500 years ago. Pup 08:10 01 Apr '11

PointlessHeadingRestrictionsWithTalkOnThePage

HA HA! You can't ban me now!! Have you noticed how many times you have blocked me? though I like you as a user, Except when you block me with an expiry time of infinite because I didn't respect your Authority. I'm seriously like, WTF? - LOL vandalz 15:28, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

It's a quote from South Park. And they aren't pointless - any form of structured writing, like haiku and sestina, forces the writer to be more creative in the way they write to be able to communicate the desired message while being forced into said structure. Either that, or I'm just an annoying prick - take your choice. Pup 07:27 04 Apr '11

Most definitely the latter. (ﾟ∀ﾟ) - LOL vandalz 08:51, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

IForgotToTellYouIWasDoneOnTheRewritingOfUnquotable:Quotes in AAAAA!

I don't know how long ago I got done, but I guess I never told you. Sorry. -- 14:10, April 6, 2011 (UTC)