User talk:Lenoxus

This user is, for the moment, back, yo.

Article focii

When I put an article in this here section, it means that I like it to a certain degree but feel it should still be edited somehow, and can't think of a way to fix it (or I don't have the time). In reality, this is just my sneaky way to add more in-Uncyclopedia references to the page in question, to increase its chance of being improved. (Feel free to dicusss any changes here or at the article's talkpage, whichever seems to make more sense. Both is actually best, but if you post here, I'm personally more likely to respond.)

I am considering just eliminating this bit because it's obviously redundant to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review. Then again, Pee Review isn't so good at resolving contradictions like the one below, so... hmm....

Ten Commandments versus The Ten Commandments:

Talkpage for the first

Talkpage for the second

4/11/06: While the first page is longer, the second definitely has some good points. The two really ought to be merged (I would give the first precence, but use the title of the second), perhaps by referring to those listed in the second as "alternate sources of the Covenant" or something like that.

5/17/06: Did you see that? I totally pulled a 360 just now. So, like, now I think it's cool to have two separate articles, but I think there should be some mention of this on the articles themselves. (I'm such a flip-flopper.) Anyone think they know why God (or whowever) made one set with the word "the" and the other without?

Other articles under my watchful eye

Biggest right now: Forum:Review of Featured Content

Also: Mad Libs, Thomas Pain, UnNecessary Articles 1.0 Project, Template:Contradicts, various others to put here when I find the time

Harry Potter

Thanks for the improvements to Harry Potter. 90% of the people who stop in there only drop by to vandalize the page. -- Rei 03:02, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome, Rei. I'm going to start a list of cool users now just to put you on it. --User:Lenoxus (I'm not logged in, but I'll fix this sig soon)

Insert title here

This page is now semi-protected instead of fully protected. You can make your changes by yourself. Also, I think "Insert ______ " should be used instead of "Insert ______ here" That way, we will still know that something should be inserted. --Sbluen 23:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Gosh thanks! Now you are cool. I'll try it my way first and see if anyone changes it (I won't mind if they do) — I think phrases like [Chuck Norris reference] should make sense by themselves, but we'll see. Lenoxus 14:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

"Insert" is still used in the Russian Reversal quote and it isn't used anywhere else except in the title. Some areas that are designed to be used are out of brackets, which is where some comments are. Also, you linked the word "Link" only at the end of the [Mandatory two-word section header] section. Aside from these inconsistancies, I think your changes are good. --Sbluen 23:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

OK, I just got your message. Thanks for the explanation (above). I'm wondering: could I make some of the changes you're suggesting (fixing "insert" inconcsistancies, etc.) and see how that works? --Lenoxus 20:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

You can try making your changes. However, I didn't revert your changes. Guest did that. You should discuss your changes with him. Also, you should see the edit histories before assuming anything about the most recent edits. --Sbluen 22:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry Sbluen, my bad. Actually, I did check the history, but got kinda confused as to why you were the one talking to me and not him/her/it. So yeah, I'll ask Guest. Maybe s/he'll come here. That would be cool. --Lenoxus 01:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I did not change the protection, or ban on edits. I cannot do that because I am not an administrator. Algorithm did that after I suggested that it should be done. I only suggested those changes and told you that the page was only semi-protected. This is another reason to look at the edit histories. Please do not say that I did things that only administrators can do because doing so could trick other users into thinking that I am one of them. --Sbluen 02:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

OK, I apologize. You are definitely not an administrator — got that. This is getting kinda silly. Peace out --Lenoxus 14:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry for complaining about a silly thing. I am a little bit new to uncyclopedia and I didn't know that it was obvious that I wasn't an administrator when I complained.

I could become an administrator soon. Now Algorithm nominated me for administrator, probably because he saw my hard work at Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD. If you want to, you can vote for me at this forum page. --Sbluen 13:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

The voting was concluded recently. I wasn't opped because I was new and few people voted for me. I probably should have told you about my nomination earlier, but I forgot to. I might be nominated again after some time. --Sbluen 00:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia is the worst

OK, here's an attempt to explain this article. It's a bit of an in-joke, unfortunately. It came about after a derogatory message in the Village Dump [1], which some people thought was funny. Someone suggested it should be expanded into an article, so I just had a field day ripping into Uncyclopedia in a kind of ironic fashion in the same tone as the original post. Almost as if it was written by the person who posted the original message.

However, other people have since edited this and it has transformed into a no-brainer all out jibe at people who slate Uncyc: sort of not the way I originally envisioned it. But, meh, there's nowt much I can do: it's not my baby any more (and in a way it never was).

In summary, it is whatever you believe it to be. Personally, I think there's nothing wrong with self-depreciatory humour. After all, we take the mick out of everything else, so why not ourselves? Have a complimentary T-shirt... --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 17:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Where can I get one of those shirts, dude? --Lenoxus 18:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Sadly, it's still only in the design stage. :-) --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 18:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Where are images?

OK, so this is driving me crazy, and it'll probably sound stupid to most of you. See, I can access any image in the site by clicking on it, see? But there doesn't appear to be any sort of "image search" or anything like that for finding one —you just have to have ESP to know the name, underscores, extra numbers and all, of the image you want. Where could I find an image, of, say money (for the article on exact change.) Please use my talkpage for response, as I'm posting this on all kindsa boards at once. --Lenoxus

You can narrow your search criteria to search for images (example). Unfortunately I don't think images are very well categorized at the moment...perhaps we should start a project for that...also, not to be rude, but please don't post questions in many different places. Your best bet is usually to ask an admin or other active and established user, or start a topic at the Forum. —rc (t) 18:47, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Is this what you're looking for? [2] --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 18:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

All right, I figured it out, people. Thanks, Hindleyite. --Lenoxus 18:47, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

....for the spit shine. Can't spel, can't type. Kin wryte. Sorta. :) ~ T. (talk) 05:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

No prob, Todd. --Lenoxus 05:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Pee Review

You nutty bunny, posting to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/American Fundie Magazine, realizing your error, and unposting. Next you'll be voting for it (or against...) on VFH. Then you'll remember it's featured already, and unpost. Yes, I've heard at least once that it would be better subtle. No, I'm not changing it. I wrote it when I was mad/crazy/scared at some dopey sh*t-headed thing that "they" did, and I'm still a bit angry now. Yes, I know that they're a minority, but it's a minority, unfortunately, with a disproportionate amount of power and an agenda that, for the most part, is the exact opposite of what a civilized society needs...

Thanks for giving me a laugh, anyways. If you want a different take on a different group, I wrote Solid Gold recently. It's still not subtle...but it's closer, I hope.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

And....

where have you been? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Just

since August. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

I'm

just groovy, thanks. Hard at work, but still keeping my hand in on Uncyc. Its a hard job, but someone needs to do it..... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Welcome to UnNews

It may please you to know I've deleted UnNews:Vatican condemns subway rescuer for "unclean physical closeness to another man". Disappointning because the title has such potential... any way, read below, and try again, if you dare. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 20:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

On your knees, worthy one! The Right Reverend Major Sir Zim_ulator blesses you. Your blessings are increasing exponentially. In the name of Sophia, the Church of Uncyclopedia and the Universal Church Triumphant of the Apathetic Agnostic, kneel and receive the melding of Zim's holy axe and your wetware. Now go write me a good UnNews article. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 03:48, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Reverend Zim_ulator says: "There are coffee cup stains on this copy, damnit! Now that's good UnJournalism."

Welcome to UnNews, Lenoxus, and thank you for contributing some crap, or otherwise attracting my attention. For a quick introduction about how you can write a decent or better UnNews article, please take a minute read our spiffy new Style Guide.

I am your humble servant (in your dreams), and if I may be of help to you, please leave me a note on my talk page.

Good things that can happen to you

---

You can win awards and prizes! You can become a better writer by subjecting your articles to the scrutiny of UnNews critique machine or UnCanninator shit article detection system. You can become a thorn in the side of Journalism as a whole. You can get promotions, ribbons, and free crockery! You can write stuff your mom would be ashamed to show her friends.

What happened to my article?

---

If you've submitted an article, and it's disappeared, I may have mercy-moved it to your user space. This means I've probably left a message on your talk page, likely in close proximity to this very message, explaining why.

Your article may have been tagged for ICU if it has significant problems meeting our criteria, or I may have deleted it because you did not register as a user.

Finally, maybe you just pissed me off. I mean, I know I'm a Roshi, and I'm supposed to be all "Zen" about everything, but I have bad days too, you know?

UnNews Audio

---

If you are interested in doing an UnNews audio, check this out.

UnNews UnFunnies

---

At present, I create UnCartoons for UnNews all by my onesies, for better or worse. Now, I will never claim that I am a good cartoonist. Fortunately, the internet provides us a way to do all sorts of things simply and easily. I found Stripgenerator.com, a great site to create cartoons with a minimum of talent.

This document is an ongoing effort by me to enhance the obfuscation coefficient of Uncyclopedia; productive changes, and criticism are welcome. Cheers! The Right and Left Reverend Major Sir Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 17:38, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

huh?

Ok, the new article seems good, and I'll probably do it as an audio soon. Becasue I smoke too much pot have a lousy memory, I seem to remember deleting it because it had no actual article written, but what do I know? I'm baked. May I suggest you use the {{WIP}} (below) template if it was something you were working on, and will finish later? Thanks for your contributions, and sieg heil to me.

WIP template — I, Lenoxus, removed this because it applies to the situation being discussed but not this actual talkpage; that wouldn't make sense. So just imagine that you're seeing such a template. While you're at it, imagine that your government and peer community are doing all they can to help you, and have only your best interests in mind. There, didn't that feel nice?

Oh, and by all means, insult the fuck out of Catholicism to your heart's content, if you please. I do so at any opportunity. This is a parody site, I think. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 23:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Uhm... who's high? I've already done the audio and uploaded for podcast (now you're fabulously famous)... apparently you didn't notice... because you're HIGH! You'll be pleased to know that I wasn't high... well, particularly high... well, considering the meds I take for pain and other things, I guess the term HIGH becomes relative. But I didn't specifically smoke some reefer with the express purpose of being stoned when I read your article. As for your other request, you're out of luck. I do these things in one take, with whatever ambient noise is in my home studio at the moment, and I seldom listen to them after I've recorded. That way, I can get as many as 20 done in a day if the need arises, and I'm up to it. Please, though, feel free to do an audio or two, take some of the load off of me, as I do have some ideas, and I'm trying to create an actual, albeit cheap, studio here, and want to have the choice of creating shitty or decent audios. Cheers, and thanks for your contributions! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 01:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

BTW

I just wanted to point out that I loved, LOVED the Bill O'Reilly article. Seriously, thought it was great.--Super90 04:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

What? Say what? The 90 doesn't take you to my talk page? that's not right. Sadly, I suck at code...--Super90 22:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Hiroshima

Thanks for the nice improvements to the article.  :) -- Rei 18:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

You're at Guilford?

Dude, I went to Guilford for one year. I spent my time doing drugs out by the ropes course. Then I dropped out and went to NY to chase destiny, or something... I don't remember... must be all the drugs. I was raised Quaker so Guilford made a big effort to recruit me, as there are about 4 quaker kids going off to college in any given year. --Super90 09:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Your myspace page.--Super90 00:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I would recommend not putting links to things if you don't want people to follow them. If you could put a link that led over the edge of the earth, I swear to god people would, lemming-like, click on it and fall off. --Super90 18:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Hmm

Ok, what's going on? —Braydie 01:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the pee

Thank you for your review of Condominium. I hope you'll check back from time to time and find that I am taking your advice to heart. BTW, the "condo" in the gentrification picture is actually a gingerbread house. It is probably made of frosting or something. Professor Fate 17:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Instant Disambig

Please do not un-subst: {{Instant disambig}}. I substituted the template so that it would appear to be like all the older disambig pages, with the added bonus of not attracting mass vandalisim (that will be caused when one template that is on 300 pages gets vandalised). --The Zombiebaron 02:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, {{Wikipedia}} is unneccasary for that template, because most of our disambigs are disambigs over at Wikipedia. --The Zombiebaron 02:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Template:USERLINK

Dunno if you saw my deletion summary, but Special:Mypage will do what I think you were trying to do with that (link to the viewing user's userpage). Just thought you should know and possibly save yourself a headache. —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 03:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

For the tip. Being a n00b I'm taking it all on board.

I've actually taken to writing anything new I do on Word anyway. So the long lits of edits with my name and an "m" next to them should be a thing of the past.

Good noob shepherding there --Sibley 15:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Template on H.R. Pufnstuf

Mahaille put Wikipedia Template towards the end of the article because when its placed at the beginning of the article, as you did, it leaves this huge useless area of white space. So I have reverted your edit and hope you understand why I did the revert. Thanks - and if you have any questions, please let me know, Hugs, Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Got it. The most mortifying part is that I didn't even notice the one that was already there... oh well. — Lenoxus 22:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

No biggie. I wish someone could figure out why that template does that funky shifting stuff. But thanks again for looking at the article ;-) Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Cookie

Zombiebaron has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

• This is basically a mad props for helping out on several different things, most recently pointing out two VFD'd pages that should have been redirects. Good job, keep it up. --The Zombiebaron 02:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • My obsessive neruoses pay off; take that, Dr. Cullen! — Lenoxus 03:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Heh -- Dr. Cullen talk
      • Oh shit, he's here! And I thought the ghost therapy sessions would be over after middle school... Go back to the century you came from, fiend! — Lenoxus 03:35, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Making me laugh won't make me give you anouther {{Cookie}} today...maybe tommorow...but I'm a strick "One Cookie A Day Diet"... --The Zombiebaron 03:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

• Oh, I'm not fishing for anything, honest. Just wrote because, like Martin Luther, I could not do otherwise. Thank you very much if I didn't say so already. — Lenoxus 03:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

And thank you for making my life easier, and funnier. -- The Zombiebaron 03:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Response from Lstarnes

Sorry about that. I deleted it to save space. I'll restore it later. --Lstarmes 00:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Not sure I get how that works, but OK. — Lenoxus 04:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

We Shall Never Forget

LET US BOW OUR HEADS IN SHAME The society for the commemoration of Porchesia would like to thank thee for helping us to remember, if only for a moment, the follies of the human race. Thank you for remembering

~ 17:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your vote

-- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  20:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Spatz on David Farragut

Thanks for editing last month, I finally David Farragut and made a pee review on it. If you have the time, could you please review it? Thanks.

Help with article

Hey wondering if you could give my article a little help don't change the basis of it, just freshen it up a bit add a couple of more jokes make it funnier I would template an add more jokes template but I don't want just anybody messing with it. So what do ya' say? Tell me on my profile or talk for the article please. The article is English gods Lt. Wyoming 21:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm afraid I've got a ton of schoolwork to focus on, and am planning to take some time off of Uncyclopedia per the message I've just put at the top (some text had actually already said I was on a break, but I don't blame you for not noticing). Anyway, the comments I left on the English gods talkpage reccomended a move, and after a bit of meditation on the subject, I've decided that the best possible title (which may lead to a some needed modification of text) would be Grammar (religion), because that's how Wikipedia would discuss the subject if it existed. When I get back, I'll have a better look at it. Lenoxus 18:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

WIP move notice of Seat hockey

Hey, your article that was called Seat hockey has been moved to User:Lenoxus/Seat hockey for further development. Feel free to move it back when you have done. Oh, and if you want to reply to this, please reply on my talk page (I do so many of these, I don't get to check them all). Thanks. —Braydie 13:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Lord Voldemort (Harry Potter)

I demand that you revert your edit to the Lord Voldemort (Harry Potter) article. He deserves an article which is why I had created one for him and it had great potential. I had just finished cleaning it up and making it incredibly hilarious when I got into an edit conflict because you were busy reverting it to that contemptably ridiculous, You Are Dead article. --86.134.153.111 19:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

You do realize that Lenoxus' last edit was on the 20th of May 2007, right? I think you're thinking edits made by this idiot. -- The Zombiebaron 00:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah yes. Thank you. --92.0.46.24 12:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Duel!!!

I challange you, Lenoxus, to a duel!! What, don't be a chicken and fight like the little squggle you are!!!!--Gelert 00:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh well, you're a pussy then--Gelert 00:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I need some advice

I have an article in my sandbox that I was thinking of putting in the Why? namespace. It's not quite done; there are a few more tweeks I want to make before I entrust it to others. Do you think the Why? is the best place for it, or do you think there's a better place? Larrythefunkyferret 05:53, October 6, 2009 (UTC)