From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Why?:Isn't there a toilet in the woods?
|
Score: 3.5 requests for toilets in woods
|
| Nominated by:
|
Mr. Monkey  Pant-hoot here. 22:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 6.5
|
- Self-nom and for: Though I'm still not that sure on this one, after receiving two fairly positive Pee Reviews and some compliments, I'm gonna give this a shot. Also, I'd appreciate it if against votes could include anything that would improve the article to a for. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- for. Yep. Good stuffs. Needs another pic I think... MrN
 22:59, Aug 29
- Any suggestions? I was considering a sketch of the "steps" outlined, but I wasn't sure if that would add much. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 02:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- weakish for. nice one monkey. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:59, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 Somebody crapped their pants. The Ghost of Methamphetamine(19:00 08-31-2008)- For. Y'know, I liked it. --UU - natter
 11:24, Sep 1
- For. Lolwut Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 21:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. 67.184.41.158 22:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
 Against. - Unfortuantly it seems to be a pretty dodgy concept to work from. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)- No pretty poor concept --Moneke 12:37, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Against. It's an amusing article, but I don't like it for the front page.
 pillow talk 15:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Sorry Monkey I just don't find these kind of articles funny, all the complaining... it's like a blog *shudder* D: I'll abstain --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     02:10, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Pant-hoot here. 22:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Against. - Unfortuantly it seems to be a pretty dodgy concept to work from. — 
