Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Is a dead body lying on my couch?

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Why?:Is a dead body lying on my couch? (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Why?:Is a dead body lying on my couch?	Score: -3 dead bodies
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
For: 4	Nom+For. I've always liked this one. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC) ... Um... Are you just gonna nom everything I've written? Cause this is my favourite thing ever. Other than that one thing. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC) No, just the stuff I like and think might get featured. (That wizard thing was an exception.) Also, you should update that Naruto article, like this. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Okay. I like the outdated why Naruto is. It's different. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Well okay, maybe the outdated version is more relevant. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 00:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC) For. Because I can relate. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:02, 16 Apr
Against: 7	Meh -RAHB 08:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Huh? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Against. Alright, first off, why is the guy's son dead? The article leaves that out and instead of an "Irony!" moment the reader is going "Huh?" Secondly, whooaaa he dumped his dead son in the river, ooooooh that stinks... it would be funnier if the dead guy could be someone the guy would want to kill, like his boss or the guy who he suspects had his son, just to add even more tenseness to the guy, IMO. And that's my vote! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:37, Apr 16 Actually, I would rather assume that his son was not dead, just asleep, maybe because of a hangover or something. He dumped his not-dead sun in the lake. Get it? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Against. Timid article. --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC) You sure do like to go on don't you? :P -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:02, 16 Apr He's still allowed to have an opinion, you know. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC) I lolled. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:45, 16 Apr against. didn't feel it for the front page. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)  Against. Interesting idea but I think the article is treading water a bit too much at the end. --Romartus 20:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Honestly, this article confused me. Why didn't the guy recognize his son? Was his son dead? If not, why didn't he realize his son wasn't dead? Does any of this have anything to do with the fact that he hates his wife and boss? I was extremely puzzled when I finished this. pillow talk 22:03, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Against. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 23:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain Djdorama 23:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH