Uncyclopedia:VFH/Uncyclopedia:No Reading Articles

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Uncyclopedia:No Reading Articles (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Uncyclopedia:No Reading Articles	Score: 12 paradoxical essay
Nominated by:	Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
For: 12	SNF Believe it or not, it's been a while since I did the ol' SNF (I think . . . hope). But yeah, in any case, it got a good pee review, and has been altered since to be even less in-jokey (a fact confirmed by the reviewer). I think it's worthy of a feature.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)  bow-chicka-wow-wow – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:03 Mar 28, 2008 For - Skullthumper's deep, insightful remarks have swayed me to his viewpoint, and I too must now vote in favor of this slice of Uncyclopedian life. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:10, Mar 28 Yes--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC) tldr MrN 12:37, Mar 28 Completely predictable for. A great read. –—Hv (talk) 28/03 14:24 For --OptyC Sucks! CUN 18:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Good stuff. Of course I didn't read it. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 18:53, Mar 28 Yes? I think voting for this article is an admission that I actually did read it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:47 Mar 29 For. Thanks to recent advances in computer technology, I didn't read this. I smelled it. Ah, the sweet, fragrant smell of a good article. Except the link to VFD of course, that had a less agreeable whiff. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:24, Mar 30 Strong For, although, I really only read the first paragraph. That's just how I roll. -- The Zombiebaron 02:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.