From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnBooks:The Wait
|
Score: 11.5
|
| Nominated by:
|
—Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:51, 7 November 2010
|
For: 14.5
|
 Nom+For. Another unbook I stumbled upon which is looking rather swell, methinks. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:51, 7 November 2010- Weak For. It works its funny and I like it just enough to say 'yes' but...it could be a lot better. Dr. Fenwick 18:06, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Sycamore (Talk) 21:36, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Its a really sad day when something of this quality is struggling for votes on VFH IMHO. -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
- For. I miss THINKER's ego. --UU - natter
 15:16, Nov 9
- For. OK, fine. This has been weighing on my mind. Something so well written can only do our feature article collection justice, I'll give it that. And I did "fix" a couple of things that were bothering me. So, sure. Aleister 12:52 10 11
- For. 24.168.90.75 22:39, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Poiz, look in my info? 22:47, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
- I, for one, laughed rather heartily. --Black Flamingo 12:00, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
 Minty. Che  } 02:38,16November,2010- For. Romartus my dear lad - this has nothing to do with Thompson. Style
 Guide 20:03, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
- For. --ERpatient 01:38, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Sprawled amongst my destruction, I lift my pen to vote for thee. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:03, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For. This nomination isn't ready to die just yet! --ChiefjusticePS3 12:29, December 7, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Deserves a feature at least for being pertinacious.--Funnybony
   18:30, Dec 11
|
Against: 3
|
 Against.- I tried again, but more per Romartus. While it is well written and clever, I just didn't laugh. Tried to change my opinion. As if a clone of Lyrithya, I thought the flash hurt more than helped the cause, and a period instead of a comma in the final flashing message would have made more sense. Aleister 17:19 9 11 (But in the end, ok then.)
- Against. I don't like it. Also, only I should have the right to be that confusing. ~
 *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101109 - 00:59 (UTC)
- Against. Looks like someone is streaming Hunter.S.Thompson here. Imitation is the height of flattery but this isn't as funny as it thinks it is. Sorry.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:57, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
against needs more mark prindle--Roman Dog Niggerbird 11:49, November 23, 2010 (UTC)
- NIGGERNIGGERNIGGER —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:53, 23 November 2010
Against. Funnybony 18:23, Nov 25 18:23, November 25, 2010 (UTC)- Against. Mrowa 21:42, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
IP's cannot vote, additional votes(1+ votes) from the same IP do not count Gen. Fudgem0bile Head-butt unicorns 22:43, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I see that, but one of those should count. --ChiefjusticePS3 23:13, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
What's this? A guy looking at his balls? How can I vote FOR an article I'd be ashamed to be associated with? Not because I have anything against anything. Here I have not checked to see who the writer is, and I count everyone as my friends, specially good hearted Socky, but the article is too childish. Embarrassing really. And not funny at all. After all this is so pertinacious that it must deserve an FA. I don't want to spoil a party, so I change to FOR--Funnybony 18:41, Nov 25
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:51, 7 November 2010
Nom+For. Another unbook I stumbled upon which is looking rather swell, methinks. 
Minty. 
Against.
