From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: The Radio Star Murder
|
Score: 15 whiplash pans 
|
| Nominated by:
|
UU - natter 
|
For: 15
|
- SNF. Seeing as how noms are thin on the ground right now, I figured I could do worse than dust off this old quasi of mine. I wasn't sure it was ready last time - a few tweaks and I'm happier now. So watch it get shot down in flames this time, I guess... --UU - natter 15:57, Mar 29
- For. ~
     16:37, Mar 29, 2010 16:37, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!!
  NOTM 19:55, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Thought this was clever the first time it was nommed, and now it's even better. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:48, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Try listening to the Buggles song while reading. Double the fun. My favorite line: (Radio Star was found to have been cut in 340 places inside of 3 minutes) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 23:16, Mar 29 2010
- For. Changed vote to a for. The article deserves featuring,
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:50, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 For. I lol'd, clever concept UU --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 07:46 EST 30 Mar, 2010- For Because of how it ties the history within the song and the history of the song into a series of characters in a brutal murder. The body, lying so helplessly dead by the pool, saddens me, and forces me to comtemplate the cruel irony of life and fame. Aleister in Chains 20:52 30 3 mmx
- For. Very clever and pretty funny, so why not?? ChiefjusticeGameBoy 11:06, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Again. ~
 20:19, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
- For --Sog1970 21:37, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Oh, oh-oh-oh, o! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*
 (talk) (stalk) Π ~  ~ 02 Apr 2010 ~ 01:21 (UTC)
- For. InMooseWeTrust 22:49, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Good. --nldr 00:22, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For - As long as the radio star is Sean Hannity. -- Kip the Egg
 Talk Works 16:12, Apr. 3, 2010
|
Against: 0
|
Against. RaNdOM-CApitAliSatION 16:25, March 29, 2010 (UTC) RaNdOM-CApitAliSatION 16:25, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Vote stricken. --UU - natter 16:50, Mar 29
- There is no cabal. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 23:16, Mar 29 2010
- In case anyone thinks I was getting precious about my article with the striking of this vote, I'll explain: this guy's only contribs were to nom a shite article and then vote against everything else on the queue within about 2 minutes. Therefore I deleted his nom and struck all his votes. If he wants to play properly next time, fine. I'm not exactly going to strike against votes with no reason! ;-) --UU - natter 08:20, Mar 30
- T'were a joke, UU... ;-) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 15:42, Mar 30 2010
- <bloody tiny>Oh I know, but it reminded me some people take such things seriously, so I thought an explanation wouldn't go amiss. --UU - natter 15:47, Mar 30</bloody tiny>
- <microscopic>Take things seriously? On a humor wiki? Perish the thought! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 20:42, Mar 30 2010</microscopic>
Against. Since you insist. It's OK but lacks a lot of punch. Style  Guide 18:37, March 31, 2010 (UTC) Fuck that, it's against my nature. You want it featured, go ahead. -- Style Guide 18:55, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
*Abstain. Can't decide. Like the original idea but doesn't jump up at me as a feature. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:43, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Okay, but not exciting. Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 10:41, Apr 1 2010 UTC 10:41, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. I lol'd, clever concept UU --
16:55, April 3, 2010 (UTC)