Uncyclopedia:VFH/Office Worker's Rant: An Excerpt

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Office Worker's Rant: An Excerpt (history, logs)

Article: Office Worker's Rant: An Excerpt

Score: 11 office drones that are behind the curve.

Nominated by: Knucmo2 11:26, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
For: 11
  1. For. Knucmo2 11:27, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
  2. For Read this before today and liked it, skimmed it today and liked it more. Nice work. Red Aleister 17:11 11 9
  3. For. You know, I like this. Dr. Fenwick 21:51, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
  4. For. A real stand out article from a writer I hadn't seen before (though he's been here since 2006). A great rediscovery and a feature. Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:40, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Five. The narrator (of the book) is quite the asshole. I would love to have him as a coworker in my office. He'd be fun. Oh, and the article's great too.Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 16:47 Sunday, September 12, 2010
  6. Symbol for vote.svg For. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 23:05, 12 September 2010
  7. For. Haaaa! Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 08:23, Sep 13 08:23, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
  8. For.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:41, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
  9. For. After the shit day I've had, this stands out to me more than ever as a feature. --Matfen 18:53, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
  10. For. Close to home and lovely. ~ Pointy.png *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100918 - 21:14 (UTC)
  11. Liked. --Black Flamingo 21:57, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 0

No against votes

Comments
  • Ineligible nomination... "You are allowed to nominate articles you wrote, so long as the article has been pee reviewed or has been listed there for a week with no reply" from the rules of VFH. It was never put on PR... MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 21:25, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
    • Well, that's odd... an article lasting this long without anyone even noticing, and a bunch of for votes... rather odd indeed. People really are odd... ~ Pointy.png *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100918 - 21:43 (UTC)
      • It's an oversight issue that's been happening quite a lot as of late. The proper solution would be more ops or perhaps a change in the VFH rules (which would definitely cause a flood of self-noms). MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 21:48, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
        • Apologies all. It has been ages since I've been here, and I honestly thought it had been Peed upon a long time ago. Forgive an oversight on my part. --Knucmo2 10:14, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
          • Per the discussion on Chief's page we'll take the UN:IAR approach as this article already reached 10 votes and an exception wouldn't kill anyone. ~Jewriken.GIF 11:30, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.