From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Brothel
|
Score: 13
|
| Nominated by:
|
Style  Guide 15:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 14
|
- For. Very good, innocent bit of writing. Style Guide 15:23, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- For. Needed a proof read, but that's done now. Can't see any reason to vote against. RabbiTechno 15:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Strong For. The "Getting that Old Time Religion" section was genius. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:01, Dec 17
- Ecstatic for. Just brilliant. IronLung 16:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- For honorariums. Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- For. Really enjoyed it. --UU - natter
 11:08, Dec 20
- For I like deadpan.--Mnbvcxz 17:44, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- I approve of this article. I am the Supreme Ruler of Reality, kneel before my presence!
- For. 65.96.184.51 04:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. MrN
 23:02, Jan 12
- For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. Asahatter (annoy) 18:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Strong For. Obscenely good. 79.117.118.250 19:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Again?Gut. 79.117.118.250 19:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- You're only allowed to vote once. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. Jd989 (talk) 01:29, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
- Against Had its moments, but overall didn't do it for me. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain. - Eh, if you guys say so...--Sycamore (Talk) 17:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)- Comment. Come on Sycamore, read it again in a better mood and vote for. Oops you were a contributor. Well, anyway. Style Guide 17:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- To be fair to Syc, I'd have abstained if I hadn't been in a good mood today. With Multiliteralist and Prettiestpretty now working on it, I have little doubt it's about to blossom into a fantastic article though. RabbiTechno 18:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Multi, my mood is never the issue when I vote on here, I aim to judge each article fairly, I have one or two nice qualitys:). I feel that this is not a feature quality article - I'm unwilling to go into a debate though - Had I peed this, I would have had quite a few problems:)--Sycamore (Talk) 18:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. I'll add some comments on the discussion page Style Guide 19:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- I will say this: Getting an Abstain from Syc is like getting 3 "Fors" from someone else. And getting a rare "For" from Syc is like going to heaven.... I've never been to heaven... :< The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 20:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment And if he can not support it, his abstention is like a Christmas present for this writer. I know what side my bread is buttered on. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 20:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Abstain In addition, I'd just like to point out that I have no idea what PP's bread analogy means. -RAHB 07:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Think about it. What would you rather have, the dry crumbles, or something tasty, satisfying and a possible link to heart disease. Hugs, Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Abstain. Could possibly, just needs a bit more...tweaking. Anyways, either feature it or don't; it's been a month.:/ – Preceding unsigned comment added by Saberwolf116 (talk • contribs)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Guide 15:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Abstain. - Eh, if you guys say so...--
(talk to me) did the most important part