From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Battle of Grunwald
|
Score: 12
|
| Nominated by:
|
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate)
|
For: 13
|
- For. Article by
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN which I made some minor changes. A conflict about historical interpretation! RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:18, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
 Very for A MadMax Award winning page, Ptok's page is sponge-worthy. R's minor contrbutions have helped a little, not much to speak of really, just a smidgeon here and there. Aleister 12:24 20 10- For. Sycamore (Talk) 12:31, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I wish all the history books were like this. Live and learn. Jeez, where the heck is Poland? Is that the place where they mine all the "Po" (Polonium)? Funnybony
   15:46, Oct 20 15:46, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Okay. ~
 *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101020 - 15:47 (UTC)
- For. Well, that would be weird if I voted against ;D Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:36, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Mrowa 19:06, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:40, 21 October 2010
 Pacman. per the contest.  Would you like a cookie, sir? 16:17,24October,2010- For. per above. Mn-z 23:41, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Aye.... -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
- Smirk. It took a while to hit home, but I liked it. -- DameViktoria
 - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 20:09, 2 Nov 20:09, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Blimey. I was expecting not to like it, for some reason. So that was a pleasant surprise. --UU - natter
 10:45, Nov 4
|
Against: 1
|
- No. don't like it--121.220.6.108 00:43, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Against History articles can be hit and miss, I just don't really see this as a feature. --138.217.107.180 01:47, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Is there a particular reason why you're restating Sycamore's vote from this nomination? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:04, 1 November 2010
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain. It's an amusing piece, but until I get some sort of explanation as to why the blockquote fellow shows up in the blockquotes as normal sans serif but outside of the blockquotes a different fellow shows up outside as normal sans serif and the blockquote shows up as italic serif... or I get the go ahead to swap it, I can't say for. It's backwards for no apparently reason. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101020 - 13:21 (UTC)
- That's fine by me as I was trying to make it more obvious who was talking on this article. Try it out.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:49, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok I have made the change. Is it easier to follow now? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:05, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101020 - 15:47 (UTC)
- Abstain. Just not feeling this, sorry. Might have to read it again later. --Black Flamingo 16:08, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate)
Very for A MadMax Award winning page, Ptok's page is sponge-worthy. R's 
Pacman. per the contest. 
Abstain. It's an amusing piece, but until I get some sort of explanation as to why the blockquote fellow shows up in the blockquotes as normal sans serif but outside of the blockquotes a different fellow shows up outside as normal sans serif and the blockquote shows up as italic serif... or I get the go ahead to swap it, I can't say for. It's backwards for no apparently reason. 
17:37, November 5, 2010 (UTC)