| Article: Constantine V
|
Score: 0
|
| Nominated by:
|
120.144.147.28 06:52, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 3
|
- for because I quite like the article and I love how well it sticks to the actual history whilst making fun of it. --120.144.147.28 06:52, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Self-For. Because I don't like images of Jesus. Mn-z 02:30, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:08, 31 October 2010- For. --138.217.107.180 01:48, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
- Against. History articles can be hit and miss, I just don't really see this as a feature.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:57, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. While I think I see what it's trying to do, I'm not understanding why it would be... and it just doesn't come off very well, anyhow. ~
 *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101030 - 15:02 (UTC)
- Against. It is trying to cover two subjects in one article (reign of Constantive V and iconoclasm) which is the main problem for me.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:40, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. 
