Forum:So, in 2015...

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > So, in 2015...
Note: This topic has been unedited for 4520 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

In 2015, once we have finished the 10th top ten voting, do you guys have it in mind to do something like a top ten top ten, where we vote on the best out of all one hundered of the top ten articles? Really early, know, but I was just wondering. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:43, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

I for one am not thinking about 4 days down the track, let alone 4 years. --Is it getting chilly in here? Yeah, you get awards now when you mock Lyrithya Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB If I do good If I do bad 08:45, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
Forum:Best Article of All Time. It's pretty dead, though. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 08:58, 5 June 2011
I think we can do that. But we need some money. I predict that by then, there are 30,000 articles, if the current article establishment on mainspaces trend continues to rise as it is now. The other seem to grow at an exponential rate. GiratinaOriginForme.png |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill Don't be fooled. I'm an Aussie too. | 11:13, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
There are already well over 35,000 articles, we agreed recently to add the UnNews pages to the count. UnNews articles are just as valid as "regular" pages, so maybe you mean over 40,000 by that time! I like the ring of that jib, matey, 40,000. Aleister 11:39 5-6-'11
Well I already tried something like this with that whole 5.5 years thing, but I really fell off the wagon with that business. Something about having lots of sex, or something. Also something about picking and formatting 400 articles into a single Top10 vote-structure without breaking the page and making it terrifically overwhelming. Bad idea in general. But this idea: I like this idea. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 17:37, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
This wouldn't be right. What about all the 11th placed articles. It would be just another slap in the face to them. Think of the 11th placed articles sometimes man. They are still here...being those guys that sit just outside the border. Crying at night. --ShabiDOO 03:55, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

We are critically low in pages

Last year, we have 26000 articles. This year, we have 35000. We are critically low on articles still. Let's fix that. We'll fix it together
Goal: 50000 articles by 2015
GiratinaOriginForme.png |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill Don't be fooled. I'm an Aussie too. | 09:13, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

No, I just ment to take all the articles that have been one of the top 10 throughout the years (making 100) and vote on them, or mabe take each #1 article from each top 10 list and vote on them, on pick out ones from all the top 10s and vote on them... just an idea. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:34, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
But on the other hand, more pages=more featured articles=more top 10s! GiratinaOriginForme.png |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill Don't be fooled. I'm an Aussie too. | 08:30, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
Actually, that's kinda silly. There will still be one feature per day regardless of the pool of articles to choose.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 04:27, June 9, 2011 (UTC)