User talk:Zombiebaron/archive9

Asking for an opinion

Dear Zombiebaron, I have made my very first... 'editing', anyway I'd like to ask an opinion on whether or not it satisfies the Uncyclopedia standards, I think you can find out what I edited right? Thank you. --S-Ranker 15:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes. You added quotes, and I see nothing wrong with them. -- The Zombiebaron 18:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Actually I also edited the article on Mahmoud Ahmadinejad --S-Ranker 20:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Once again, I see nothing wrong with your edits. -- The Zombiebaron 21:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for tolerating me and I'm really sorry for bothering you.--S-Ranker 14:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Mmmmm Children

	The Premier has awarded you a coupon for 50% off of 1 child with the purchase of 3 children at equal or lesser value!!
	Presented for your vote and getting Walgreens Drug Store featured. In Soviet Russia, thanks YOU!! Offer Expires 12/21/2012

02:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Alright. -- The Zombiebaron 21:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Please don't eat me.

For your work as Executioner in the Capercorn Nazi War Crimes Trial, The Capercorn presents you with a Nuremburg Award. Capercorn 19:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Thanks. -- The Zombiebaron 21:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC) WAAOU!!! Forum:What does WAAOU stand for? —Braydie 22:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC) WAAOU!!! -- The Zombiebaron 04:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC) FU ZOMBIEBARON!!!!1 Dear Zombiebaron. FU! I mean seriously, I've been begging to win UGotM for ages now, and you just have to go out and spoil my dream. I'm a noob, i didn't know that you could only vote once, It doesn't state that on the UGotM page. I nommed your image for vfh, and This is how you repay me? I sincerely beg for you to make an exception of the "cannot be banned for more than one day" rule, and redo the voting for UGotM.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 22:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC) While I thank you for nominating my image for VFP, that has nothing to do with this. You cannot bribe admins with nominations. I am of the beliefe that users who "want" awards are the ones that shouldn't get it. Scientists who set out writing papers and inventing this just to get a Nobel Prize shouldn't get it, and the same is true on Uncyclopedia. That aside, what you did was wrong. It is a general unwritten rule that nobody votes against anouther user on an award unless they have a real reason, and that is especially true for voting against other users so that you will win an award. I can't really expect you to have known that, but this is how you learn. So far I can see no reason why you should win UGotM this month. -- The Zombiebaron 22:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC) I understand your reasoning for stopping me from winning UGotM, but at the moment, the only people who are real candidates for it are Me and Starnestommy. Starnestommy was banned for reasons worse than mucking around on UGotM, and I, after this, am no longer eligible for UGotM. this leaves us with exactly 0 legal votes for it. If another suitable candidate happens to come along for the award comes along, let it be so, but if not, we may find ourselves in a position with no UGotM. Also, the fact that you banned me twice proves that the only reason you banned me for a day and 2 seconds was to make me an illegal candidate for UGotM, which left only one remaining candidate with a chance: Stm. This also happens to be the same candidate which You nommed for the award. Because my offences were fairly mild (you'd have to admit), the only reason you banned me was so that your candidate of choice, stm, would win UGotM, in place of the candidate which had the majority of votes, who was me. Before I continue, however, I would like your opinion on what I have just said.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 02:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC) Sorry to butt in, but I like to change a rule on UGotM. Change "Any nominee cannot have been banned for longer than a day, for at least the previous month." to "Any nominee cannot have been banned for longer than a day, for at least the previous month. If you were blocked AFTER you were nommed, then you are still eligable." This wasy we wouldn't have this mess and Starnestommy, Metropolis, and Zerotrousers would still have won the award. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC) Thanks AAA!. I totally agree.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 11:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC) I'm going to start a petition for this on miniluv, actually. I disagree tottally. UGotM is a joke. It is not a serious award, but a full fledged joke. I makes me sad when people take UGotM seriously, and that is why I seem to be this hard-nosed-motherfucker-of-an-admin who banned you Zerotrousers. It's a joke man! Go nominate someone who doesn't deserve it, and maybe someday when you are well respected and a wonderful contributor, you will be the Useless Gobshite too. -- The Zombiebaron 04:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Zombiebaron: I also totally agree. That UGotM is a joke, and that is why i am so upset that you had to make such a fuss over me voting twice. Who cares? All i want is a fancy template to put on my user page and to actually win an award. Also, there are lots of uncyclopedians who don't know that I exist, so me winning the award might alert them of my presence. I don't want to make a big fuss of UGotM. I just want to win it. Nuff said. Also it sounds funny. That too.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 05:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Why do you care about people knowing who you are through your winning of an award? Go out and make some wonderful contributions and everyone will know who you are. Also, I'm not making a big deal out of it. Were Braydie (for example) to make several votes against everybody other then him nominated for an award, I would ban him too, and probably for several weeks. -- The Zombiebaron 18:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Ok, Ok, you win. Just promise me that you will put a warning on all the major awards that you'll get banned if you vote more than once.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 06:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC) That isn't why you were banned. You were banned because you voted multiple times in order to win the award. Had you voted for everyone other then yourself, I would have just gently reminded you of the rules. -- The Zombiebaron 15:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Fair enough.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 06:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Korean Air Dearest Mr/Ms Zom…whatever, Um… maybe I’m missing the point here, but after carefully making sure to read the sage advice found here (http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia:How_To_Be_Funny_And_Not_Just_Stupid) I took to heart what was written there and mixed ample amounts of fact with humor. Much to my surprise, you took the liberty of extricating the page on Korean Air. OK… um… so school me. How does one meet your stringent requirements? I read the background page before contributing and I either failed to understand the meaning, or I failed to discover some additional page of information that revealed the nugget of truth (i.e. the list of taboo topics).The quaint note left in the wake of the extrication was (Stolen from those fact jockies.) with a link. Um… I see… so, let me get this right. Anything over “there” is taboo? While on the one hand we would follow the suggestion above and surround humor with fact, on the other hand if any of the facts are also found “over there” then they are taboo? So, for example, the substantial list of air disasters can’t be shown in chronological order because “over there” they use chronological order. They can’t be shown as per actual flight and date because, after all, “over there” shows the flight and date. Anything they do “over there” is to be avoided? I smell the mighty blue pencil of a humor editor. Did the humor editor find something not to his or her linking? Now I can see why so much pride is taken in stating how many pages are axed each day…. I’m simply not sophisticated enough to get it. So what are your hoops and where do I find the real instruction manual for jumping through them? (tilde tilde tilde tilde) At the point in time that I deleted it, I was fairly sure that it was just copied and pasted from Wikipedia. I will however take anouther look, and pending that, recreate the page. Sorry for inconveniencing you. -- The Zombiebaron 17:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC) It currently reads word for word the same as the Wikipedia article of the same name. I can however recreate it in your userspace so that you can work on it until it is no longer a copy of a Wikipedia article. -- The Zombiebaron 17:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC) DUP article ICU'd for 'just a list' It's not supposed to be 'just a list'. I'll admit that there is a large block that looks like a list in there but it's actually a very specific block of text. It's not a 24-point-setup and 1-point-punchline, it's the entirety of the Nazi party 25-point-plan with every reference (but one) to Germany replaced with Ireland. The point is, it's not supposed to be read as a funny list, it's supposed to be read as a political plan which, by about point 15, the reader should be twigging might have something to do with Nazis (I left every use of the word 'reich' in). It's a bit of a slow joke and, although after someone has twigged, the rest of the plan is a bit extraneous, unless all 25 points are quoted, it's no longer a rip-off of the Nazi party plan and hence no joke at all. Is it genuinely not funny (as a whole)? (now that it's been explained) or was it just a bit too obscure? You're welcome to take that block out if you want, but I won't mutilate my own article to remove something I find genuinely funny. Gerkin 22:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC) While it is obscure, I'll let you have 30 days to make it look pretty. -- The Zombiebaron 23:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Please, Help Zombiebaron (Alessandra & Scarlett articles) Zombiebaron, What can I do about my Alessandra & Scarlett articles to get the "ICU" off of them? Or rather, can you tell me what's not funny about them? Thanks in advance, "jwsd10" Your going to have to link me to the articles. -- The Zombiebaron 16:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Here you are: Alessandra Ambrosio and Scarlett Johansson The problem is that they aren't funny. -- The Zombiebaron 17:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Maybe to you (its not funny)... Anyway, can you answer my questions: What can I do about my Alessandra & Scarlett articles to get the "ICU" off of them? Or rather, can you tell me what's not funny about them? And suggest anything funny to add to it? Everything. Not a word of them is funny. Sorry to sound harsh but its true. Pee Review however may be able to help you. -- The Zombiebaron 18:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC) No problem. Thanks for the tip; I'll go and see what I should do about it. Thanks. Your welcome. -- The Zombiebaron 18:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC) I am speechless Zombie- You great big old sweetheart you! I just logged into today to post an unnews story and saw the message from Modus and then you and I am seriously touched (in a good way) and all weepy now. You know how to make a woman all crying and shit happy! If you were here I would I'd be wiping my eyes and runny nose of your shirt. Thanks for the nomination - March was a bitch of month for me, so this was really sweet of you. Hugs, Penny. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Oh wow. Now if only I could make women I meet at parties wipe their snot on my shirt I would set! But yah, I'm so glad that you won WotM, as you have written so many wonderful articles. -- The Zombiebaron 15:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Dude, you want women to make all crazy over you? Look at their eyes, not the their breasts when you talk to us. Thats how Packard won me over. Hey, Can you answer a question for me as well? What do these little numbers ( (-49) ) in green mean when I look at my watch page. Some are negative, some are poitive, none of it makes sense. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC) They are also on Recent Changes. The numbers (green or red, posative or negative) resemble the number of characters added or subtracted from a page. Really handy for seeing blanking. Other then that, they are just their to annoy us, thanks to Wikia. -- The Zombiebaron 19:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC) JtHM Why did you delete my Johnny the Homicidal Manic page? I read the Vanity article, and it wasn't a Vanity! I will bring back one of Johnny the Homocidal Maniac and Johnny the Homicidal Maniac. Choose one. -- The Zombiebaron 13:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Johnny the Homicidal Maniac Done. -- The Zombiebaron 22:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC) My talk page Please delete my talk page. WAAOU!!! 18:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Alright. -- The Zombiebaron 18:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC) You did notice that the guy is spreading around his template on other users' pages, including yours? ~ 18:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC) I did. It was just the userpages of Braydie and I, and Braydie and I are in control of the situation at the moment. -- The Zombiebaron 18:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC) I see. Is there a hidden agenda with this template I'm not aware of? ~ 18:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC) If there is, I don't know about it either. It just seemed harmless to Braydie and I, so when we saw the edits we decided to leave them. -- The Zombiebaron 18:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Alright. Happy Passover btw, :) ~ 19:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Rav Todot. -- The Zombiebaron 19:36, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Carrie Underwood Could you have a look at it and let me know if it's still ugly? Thanks! kuribo 14:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC) It needs some fancy formatting. For examples of "pretty" articles, look at most of the pages on this page. -- The Zombiebaron 15:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Shorecrest High School Why did you deleate my page on Shorecrest High School, you do realize that: It wasn't a vanity article, I was carful to read those and my article passed The lable indicates that I'm in the process of editing the page and have not finished because I want other peoples input as well. Catmaxy 07:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Before I completely reverse my deletion, answer me one question. Is Shorecrest High School a real place. Until you answer, the deletion stands. -- The Zombiebaron 15:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Yes, it's a real place, did you try googling it, or wikiing?Catmaxy 17:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Ummm, yes, I was aware of the answer before I asked the question. However, because it is a real place, that I assume you go, it is vanity. I've never heard of it, and neither has Codeine's Mum, so no amount of {{construction}} is going to bring it back to the mainspace. I can however bring it back in your userspace if you want. -- The Zombiebaron 17:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Well, yes, that would work, when you ask if it's a real place or not your implying that you don't know though so yeah.Catmaxy 17:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Well, in future you should note that all admins check Wikipedia and Google before claiming that something is vanity. I was only asking to prove a point, because the page by the name you gave me was never deleted, and was never made. -- The Zombiebaron 17:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Well, that would make sense to me and you, but I have run into some idiots before that don't do what makes sense, so I was being careful.Catmaxy 18:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Alright, now I need the name of the page that you want back, because as I mentioned, the name you gave never was deleted. -- The Zombiebaron 18:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Well i saved a back-up copy because I perdicted this happening, so I might just upload that and save some time, also iI'm curious, how do you become an admin?Catmaxy 18:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC) It took me well over a year of helping out the community in various ways, not the least of which is reverting vandalisim and pageblanking. Basically, if you want to be an admin you will need to do alot of work with little to no credit until someone notices, and then perhaps you will thrown into a vote. But, its thankless and hard work that once you accept you can never unaccept. Plus, they steal your soul through your spine. -- The Zombiebaron 18:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Well it seems that i may be better at editing than writing, so maybe. And also how to you revert page blanking.Catmaxy 18:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC) You go into the page history, click on the version before the blanking, click edit, type "revert" into the summary box, and click save. Same for vandalisim. -- The Zombiebaron 18:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the help and advice, I'll remake the page on my namespace and not bother you anymore.Catmaxy 18:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Okay. You aren't really bothering me, because if you now go off and revert something, I will be happy knowing that I didn't have do it. -- The Zombiebaron 18:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Actually I was lying before, I have one more question, if I make my page good enough can I put it into circulation?Catmaxy 18:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Check with an admin first. -- The Zombiebaron 18:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Got it. Shalom! Yum! You've received a basket of delicious fresh bagels from Catmaxy! Mazel Tov! Catmaxy 02:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC) I'm still lying about not bothering you anymore, is there anyway to get noticed any sooner, and also when you said reverting pages and vandalisims, if I just edit the page and delete the offending item or whatever it is, does that still count, so to speak, becuase lots of the time it's easier to do that. A sheynem dank in advnace for answering the questions of a n00b who has great hopes and dreams. Oh and I moved my shorecrest page to my user page. Sholem Aleykham, I Am Yukio, Certified Yiddisher Kop, A Broch Tzu Dir! 06:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Its better to just let people find you and see your work instead of you pushing yourself on them, it makes for a much better "holy shit this guy is awesome" moment. And, reverting is a muchbetter way to do it, and is preffered 9 times out of 10. -- The Zombiebaron 13:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Ok thanks for the advice, now I'm off to revert and edit.Sholem Aleykham, I Am A Certified Yiddisher Kop, A Broch Tzu Dir! 21 49, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Port Manteau, LA Hey, why'd you delete my article? I realize it needed improvement, but it's a work in progress. Tetsujin 19:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC) I deleted it because it didn't comply with the vanity policy. I can, if you want, however, recreate the page in your userspace so that you can work on it there until you are finished. -- The Zombiebaron 22:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC) I'm not sure what that means, since even the policy pages are spoof-laden around here. I am not associated with Port Manteau, LA. It doesn't exist. So I'm not clear on how the vanity policy applies. But, yeah, I would appreciate it if you could throw a copy of the article up somewhere I can access it, and I'll take another shot at making it sufficiently funny without reverting to a bunch of Oscar Wilde quotes.Tetsujin 00:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Before I can bring it back I need its name. The name you provided never existed. -- The Zombiebaron 00:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC) LA = short for Louisiana. The article's name was "Port Manteau, Louisiana". Sorry for the unclarity. 24.128.232.106 05:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC) User:Tetsujin/Port Manteau, LA. -- The Zombiebaron 05:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC) You remind me... Of the users who enjoyed bringing up euroipods and other flames, once and again. Just with something far more annoying and with its meanings in the outside world too. I, myself, couldn't be part of this project if I had the chance to see that picture every time I open the main page. Thank's for being so sensitive. Pessach sameach.-Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 17:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Come now Rataube, I'm not as bad as that. In fact, I wasn't even aware that Orange Jews was ever nominated, until seeing your vote summary. The fact that me, a fellow jew, nominating an image that, I agree, raises some moral issues, could be compared to a disscusion about about the power of admins when it comes to featuring articles, is a pretty far strech. I simply find the pun to be well crafted. If it gets -3, then fine I'll accept that, and if it gets +8, I would only hope you would react in the way you see fit. Sorry if I offended you, that wasn't the purpose of the nomination. -- The Zombiebaron 17:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC) The comparision was only couse of the unproductive revival of a controversial topic. If you weren't aware you were doing so, accept my apologies. Nevermind, I've seen you've taken the nomination back, appreciate it.-Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 17:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Asir Todah, -- The Zombiebaron 17:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC) He reminds me of a young Warren Beatty. Back when he was making Splendor in the Grass and The Roman Spring of Mrs Stone. Rugged, a bit edgy, but with a certain refinement. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Wa-hey! Free Food! Shalom! Yum! You've received a basket of delicious fresh bagels from RabbiTechno! Lekhaim! מזל טוב (yours are especially brain-flavoured) RabbiTechno 11:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 'aight. -- The Zombiebaron 14:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Font? Hello, Zombiebaron! I am a lowly, yet patriotic and loyal, Uncyclopedian. In Pee Review, I had a recommendation that an article of mine would benefit by changing all the text into a certain font (that is, the font used in the game). This article is intended to replace the current article of the same name, by the way. Well, I was later referred to "talk to an admin" about a new font (I found a site to download the font itself), and you were randomly picked selected from a panel of judges to put up with me hear me out! So I guess my question is, is it possible to add a new font to Uncyclopedia? Thanks. --Andorin Kato 21:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 'aight, so I think I got all the text, and if you want to add more, or make more text into the font I used, just add that fancy tag (<"span style="font-family: fantasy"">, no quotes) around that text with the end tag (<"/span">) at the end. Also to use a diffrent font family, change the word "fantasy" to on of the words on the Wikipedia page. I hope your glad at all the work I had to do...and I hope that all the work I did was what you asked for...cause it would be a shame if it wasn't. -- The Zombiebaron 23:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC) The Lord of Moxie recognizes the impressive Moxie within YOU, Zombiebaron/archive9. For {{{1}}}. Congratulations. Your trophy and subscription card are in the mail. Damn right I'm glad. Many thanks, Your Worshipfulness. --Andorin Kato 23:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Spread the word. -- The Zombiebaron 00:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Untitled Complaint A You huffed the ROT18 article. I just want to point out that the ROT18 article was ROT18 applied to a very useful description of what ROT18 is. That is all. If by "useful desctiption" you mean "wikipedia article", and by "ROT18 applied" you mean "ROT18 applied so that the information and formatting are completely a mess", then yes "That is all." -- The Zombiebaron 22:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Thank you Thank you for welcoming me, although you are possibly a zombie. I cannot have that as I am a [1] and so I must devour your past now. Good day to you sir! Langolier 11:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC) I agree. -- The Zombiebaron 14:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC) I was referred to you by Starnestommy Recently I wrote an article (IRC Bible) that presented the explusion from the garden of eden as an IRC chat. God was represented as a leet speaking op, adam and eve were noobs, and the serpent unsuccessfully campaigned to become the lead species of the planet. Somehow, this got erased and replaced with a redirect to IRC chat or some such. I'm just wondering why the article was apparently huffed, if you know, and if it's possible to get the data back, since I neglected to back it up, which I hopefully won't do again. I thought it was humorous and in the vein of the war game articles with plenty of room for expansion and I am disappointed that it appears to have been summarily deleted. --Hrodulf 02:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC) User:Hrodulf/IRC Bible now contains the deleted material. Also, in the future please place {{construction}} on pages that are short and strangly formatted. -- The Zombiebaron 02:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks, it was intended as a war game style collaboration thing but at least I have my data back now. I thought we were using ICU instead of just huffing though. I mean, I'm not an admin so what do I know, but I would think the humor potential of this one was obvious. As for being strangely formatted, it was formatted to simulate an IRC log. Adding to it would seem to be a funnier thing to do than huffing it. I mean, it writes itself. <Cain>PWN. See, it's that easy! Oh well, I'll work on it some more and this will be a good article some day and especially hilarious to people who know the bible. --Hrodulf 02:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Hey man, no harm no foul, eh? Anyway, I'm sorry that I huffed it, and will strive to do better in the future. -- The Zombiebaron 02:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC) It's ok, I probably could even have recreated it if I had to, who knows, maybe it would even have been better. I have to add to it obviously. At least I was able to get it back. --Hrodulf 02:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the imput I got the Ugly sign, I think I fixed it, but tell me if I need to change something else. Thanks I have no clue what this is about, but your welcome. -- The Zombiebaron 02:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Yeah, I probably should've told you what I was talking about, sorry. I was talking about the Uglyness of the Extreme Ironing page. sorry I understand. -- The Zombiebaron 22:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC) yeah, so can I take the ugly sign off yet, or is it still ugly? No. But I can, will, and did. -- The Zombiebaron 00:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks Welcomes -- The Zombiebaron 01:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Not that big of a deal. I have 4 email address and I only check the one I used to sign up every cuppal of months to this end I have discovered that I failed to activate my account and my conformation code and so forth has expired. I kindly request your help in this matter, Sincerely, The Good Doctor Ayumi Kitada, LoTAOA, UmP, MUN, Ph.D. 23:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC) I thought you were on vacation! --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Shows how much you know. -- The Zombiebaron 02:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Indeed it does.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Why am I banned off IRC? Hey could you help me out I got banned for no reason. -- CartoonDiablo I am currently on vacation, and the fact that you didn't read the notice about me being on vacation is reason enought for you to stay banned, or to talk to an active admin. -- The Zombiebaron 20:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC) WTF? Why am I banned from IRC? --Starnestommy 02:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Acctaully, I have several witness, and a log, where you asked to be banned for talking about huffing penises. -- The Zombiebaron 02:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC) I didn't mean to say "/me huffs dick" and I didn't ask to be banned; I asked for my userpage to get huffed. --Starnestommy 02:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC) That is a log. It is what happened. You asked to be banned. -- The Zombiebaron 02:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Where? --Starnestommy 02:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Right there before you got banned. -- The Zombiebaron 02:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Can you unblock me and/or huff my userpage? --Starnestommy 02:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Yes, I just huffed your userpage, but I will not unban you right now. -- The Zombiebaron 02:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC) When? --Starnestommy 02:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC) The word "when" isn't a sentence, or for that matter a question, on its own. You must make clear what you are refering to. The only thing that you could be refering to is the word "now", and the answer to "when", in the context of the word "now" is, "now". -- The Zombiebaron 02:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC) When can I be unbanned? --Starnestommy 02:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC) You will be unbanned when I fell you are ready. Wasteing my time on my talk page doesn't help. -- The Zombiebaron 02:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC) OK. Will do. --Starnestommy 02:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC) (Talk to me) For the love of Sweet Jesus Help User:Midnight_7 Has Accused Me of Blanking for a second time I assure you I have done no such thing the article in question is the Vandalism/example on wheels! in witch case even if I did blank anything it would have been of no harm to anyone. I Beseech you to straiten this all out, if indeed I have blanked anything I assure you it was accidental and I apologize however on a more personal note several mean and unkind things wear written about me on that page and I took it all in stride. --AyumiKitada 08:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC) You didn't blank it. Now, tell whoever said you did to look here. -- The Zombiebaron 12:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC) Famine Ban Me any ways for one vary painful day. its good to be back. but I was ban for defending myself on the ban patrol page and it was the only place I could think of to make a case. I know there is nothing you can do but I trust you and I fell that I can safely express my felling of injustice with you. with that sead I can get back to my work making Uncyclopedia funnier and safer for all Uncyclopedans. Thank you for your time, --The Good Doctor Ayumi Kitada, LoTAOA Ph.D. 00:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Well, just as you trust me, I trust Famine. I understand that being banned can be painful, however Ban Patrol has a use, and the Village Dump (the place that you should have taken your case, by the way) has anouther use, and the mixing of two uses normally ends up pissing off the people who use each page for what they think using that page should be, and then the people who did the mixing get banned. But yah, I am touched that you feel you can talk to me. -- The Zombiebaron 01:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Tagging me How about you please give me some real advice? I put it on the help forum. Remove the tag if you feel like being nice:) I don't mean to whine, I just want to know. I'm looking for help, not complaining about this. You need to be far more specific, as I have no clue what on earth you are talking about. -- The Zombiebaron 12:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC) sorry man, I meant mrawr. I didnt even expand my mind far enough to comprehend u have better things to think about^_^ 'aight. Well, that page is basicly just random. While it may have taken you days to write, it could have been written in 3 minutes. You should work hard and make it understandable. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy absurd humor, but mrawr is just...not funny, because it is so random. -- The Zombiebaron 17:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Untitled Message A Hey man, whats up? I need to ask you something: how do you change your user name? or delete accounnt? I wanna change i or make a new account cuz i dont like usin' my real full name here like a dumbass. Thanks brotha, rock on. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Amber Kroeger (talk • contribs) The person you need to talk to about that kind of thing is Sannse. However, had you not told me that your username and your real name were the same, I would have just figured that Amber was a color, and Kroeger was a refrence to a horror movie. -- The Zombiebaron 00:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC) Picture I saw the upload. NICE. —Braydie 16:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC) Yah, the naked pictures of you that I just uploaded are pretty hot. Glad you like them B-Man. -- The Zombiebaron 02:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC) UnNews:Parti Québécois gains support in Alberta Thank you for your vote. It's nice to know that someone gets my sense of humor. Please don't die! I plan on writing more. :) --Kenvalyi 02:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC) It's always nice to see people fighting for Canada. -- The Zombiebaron 03:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Banned form IRC? Why have I been banned from IRC? Was it for telling everyone to click here ? --Lstarmes 00:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC) I would assume so. -- The Zombiebaron 00:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Can you unban me from IRC? --Lstarnes 01:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Only if you promise never to do it again. -- The Zombiebaron 01:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC) OK. I promise never to abuse "click here" again. If I do, I'll drink a liter of molten lead. --Lstarnes 01:05, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 1 week ban -- The Zombiebaron 01:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC) And, now your never coming back due to previous bans. -- The Zombiebaron 01:42, 3 March 2007 (UTC)