From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Why?:Do a Pee Review
|
Score: 15 Pee Reviews
|
| Nominated by:
|
Mnbvcxz (Annoy) 22:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 16
|
- nom & for This article is quite funny, and might encourage people to do more pee reviews. The list queue is starting to get long.--Mnbvcxz (Annoy) 23:00, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- For. Funny and useful. IronLung 01:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- For. Though I generally dislike "meh" votes without further explanation. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Moses. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:49, Dec 31
- For. A parody of a self-parody? That's fractal parody...complex stuff. Rabbi Techno
 kvetch  Contribs  FOXES 12:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- For. Advertising FTW. --UU - natter
 16:54, Dec 31
- I approve of this article. I am the Supreme Ruler of Reality, kneel before my presence!
- For. This deserves to be featured. It will probably cause a lot more people to pee. Ryuinfinity 23:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. *gasp* exclamation point! Le Cejak • <21:43 Jan 02, 2009> 21:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 - T.L.B.
 WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:49, Jan 3
- FOE--
   20:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 A good reference on doing a pee review 4. I like it. ~ [Citation Needed is here. Let's talk.] 03:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)- For Great article. --Docile hippopotamus 06:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. ~
 10:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- for. the proofreading service is ghey! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:14, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. -- bad mannered Ape (edify) (Riot Porn) 16:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
- Knee-jerk against per my policy of "we really shouldn't feature articles that reference Uncyclopedia."
 pillow talk 09:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
btw, this was co-written by Cajek and MrN9000 --Mnbvcxz 03:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Wow. People are voting for this? Um. Hey Hyper: we are a parody of Wikipedia. :) Hopefully this page is a parody of such things as this. I had no idea people would vote for it though. MrN
 16:01, Jan 4
- Yes, this is a parody of Wikipedia, and you would never, ever, ever see WP:BOLLOCKS on the front page of Wikipedia in their little feature box. I'm not saying that this shouldn't exist or that it isn't funny - just that it isn't front-page material. pillow talk 21:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
A good reference on doing a pee review 4. I like it. 
16:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)