Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Do a Pee Review

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Why?:Do a Pee Review (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Why?:Do a Pee Review	Score: 15 Pee Reviews
Nominated by:	Mnbvcxz (Annoy) 22:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
For: 16	nom & for This article is quite funny, and might encourage people to do more pee reviews. The list queue is starting to get long.--Mnbvcxz (Annoy) 23:00, 30 December 2008 (UTC) For. Funny and useful. IronLung 01:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC) For. Though I generally dislike "meh" votes without further explanation. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC) Moses. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:49, Dec 31 For. A parody of a self-parody? That's fractal parody...complex stuff. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC) For. Advertising FTW. --UU - natter 16:54, Dec 31 I approve of this article. I am the Supreme Ruler of Reality, kneel before my presence! For. This deserves to be featured. It will probably cause a lot more people to pee. Ryuinfinity 23:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC) For. *gasp* exclamation point!   Le Cejak • <21:43 Jan 02, 2009> 21:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:49, Jan 3 FOE--    20:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)  A good reference on doing a pee review 4. I like it. ~ 03:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC) For Great article. --Docile hippopotamus 06:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC) For. ~ 10:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC) for. the proofreading service is ghey! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:14, 5 January 2009 (UTC) For. -- inept Ape (feel) (Riot Porn) 16:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Against: 1	Knee-jerk against per my policy of "we really shouldn't feature articles that reference Uncyclopedia." pillow talk 09:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	btw, this was co-written by Cajek and MrN9000 --Mnbvcxz 03:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC) Wow. People are voting for this? Um. Hey Hyper: we are a parody of Wikipedia. :) Hopefully this page is a parody of such things as this. I had no idea people would vote for it though. MrN 16:01, Jan 4 Yes, this is a parody of Wikipedia, and you would never, ever, ever see WP:BOLLOCKS on the front page of Wikipedia in their little feature box. I'm not saying that this shouldn't exist or that it isn't funny - just that it isn't front-page material. pillow talk 21:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.