Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Do I need to provide this?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VFH overview
All nominations
Feature queue
Re-feature queue
Recently featured
Recently failed
Archive
Rules

Why?:Do I need to provide this? (history, logs)

Article: Why?:Do I need to provide this?

Score: 16 users that won't provide this 300x1.jpg

Nominated by: Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 20:28, Mar 30
For: 17
  1. For. Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 20:34, Mar 30 20:34, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
  2. For Funny. -- Binky The WonderSkull 22:43, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Symbol for vote.svg DAMN YOU NECROPAXX! I wanted to write this. —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 23:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
  4. For. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:48, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
  5. For because apparently it's EVIL to vote against articles now. Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 10:36, Apr 1 2010 UTC
  6. Pager At first I thought it was about Why?, and was going to happily vote Symbol declined.svg Against. without reading it, then I decided to read it when the page fell open when I dropped Uncyclopedia, and it's come to this! Aleister in Chains 10:47 1 4 mmx
  7. For Entertaining and stays on track for its entire length. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:17, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Oh, heck, why not? I've read it over a couple times, and I'm happy in saying yes to this. (Mind you, I'd still enjoy that Pee Review...) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 04:14, Apr 2 2010
  9. For. InMooseWeTrust 22:41, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Why do I need to vote for this?—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! CUN.png Icons-flag-us.png NOTM 20:38, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
  11. For. Fun. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:07, Apr 4
  12. Symbol for vote.svg For. Per the Pee Review you were so desperately craving and the edits you made. This article is great! -- Skinfan13 12:10 EST 4 April, 2010
  13. For. Best. Title. Ever. User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig1 00:14, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
    Inorite? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 00:20, Apr 5 2010
  14. For. — The Rift Icons-flag-ca.png (grumble) 17px-Compassrose.gif MUN CPT DAD 18:58, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
  15. For Why not? Admin DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 02:23, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
  16. For. Megaman126512 22:58, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
  17. Why per HELPME. —Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:38, 6 April 2010
Against: 1
  1. Against. Not a feature. It's a bit too short too.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* Happytimes.gif (talk) (stalk) Π   ~ Xkey280.jpg ~  02 Apr 2010 ~ 06:45 (UTC)
Comments

Really unique, in a Mad magazine way. Excellent! Already Pee Reviewed. Cool! I love it, and hope others will too.--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 20:28, Mar 30

  • Comment. The author put this up for Pee Review. The nominator said he wanted to put it up on VFH as it was. The author nicely requested that he not do this. (See discussion here). The nominator did it anyway. The author is a very nice guy, and may well respond that this is "no big deal." But please, everyone, respect the wishes of authors who want their work reviewed. If this happened to me I'd be very pissed. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:57, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pee Review requested. after learning about this, the author wrote "I'm flattered, but would SOMEBODY review my article please?" If you're an experience reviewer, please go and review ASAP. I you do a detailed Pee Review in 24 hours, I'll personally give you a cookie. (I'd write it myself, but I did the first review). Also while editors are usually discouraged from making major changes to an article that's on VFH, in this case I think we can give the author an exception. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  21:06, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
    Gub. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:17, Mar 31 2010
  • I you got really overworked over this. There is no rule against nominating an article which is on pee review, there are many precedences. Granted, Funnybony could have waited, but I think his action actually says - "no pee review needed, this piece is perfect as is" and should be seen as a compliment rather than a bad thing. There's nothing wrong with changing the article while it's on VFH if the author think it's needed to support its success on VFH. So let's not make a big story out of this issue. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:44, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
    Oh, you have no idea how tempted I was to put "BIG STORY" in giant flashing text. So tempted. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 21:47, Mar 31 2010
    I'll ban your ass from here to eternity. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:49, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
    I stated my opinion; I'll shut up now. Thanks for listening. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:01, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
    Don't shut up without voting! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 22:04, Mar 31 2010
    I'll vote when I'm not in the middle of a temper tantrum. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:11, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
    Okie-day. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 22:20, Mar 31 2010

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Ninjastar.svg Featured. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:32, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
This article has passed VFH and was featured on 8 April 2010. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Retrieved from "https://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why%3F:Do_I_need_to_provide_this%3F&oldid=5088838"