From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnNews:Local man disappointed as Twister game fails to turn sexual
|
Score: 12.5 disappointingly non-erotic party games
|
| Nominated by:
|
For: 14
|
 Self-nom and for First thing I wrote in quite a while. -- ugly Ape (lather) (Riot Porn) 01:59, June 10, 2010 (UTC)- Nice He should just rape her. Gay. But a very nice page. Aleister in Chains 23:20 9 6 MMX
- For MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:41, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak For. I thought about peeing this when I first saw it was up on the queue. It could use a little more--perhaps something about this not being the only awkward pseudo-sexual incident in their history, or something--but as it is it's a very solid piece. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:14, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Totally ~ Readmesoon 03:14, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 Pacman. Been there, and therefore, haven't done that. It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!!  03:32,10June,2010- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:53, 10 June 2010
- For. Might have been inspired by the onion, but it sure made me piss my pants. Godspeed. --SonOfPhyllis 15:22, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Read it again - though I am not normally keen to feature UnNews articles.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:58, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Probably the funniest UnNews I've ever read. Yoyoddd 22:53, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Significantly different from the Onion article - and funnier. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:03, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For.It's now, it's originally authored, and I have my own sinister reasons.
 Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 02:50, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Megaman126512 05:15, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Poor guy. --Matfen 08:06, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 1.5
|
 Against. I question the wisdom of highlighting an article that is basically the exact same joke that the onion did 9 years ago. User:Mrthejazz/sig 05:18, June 10, 2010 (UTC)- Against. Featuring this would make us look like a bunch of derivative assholes. 75.142.240.24 09:44, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Really? You against voters have got to be kidding. All humor derives from other stuff. I heard Jerry Seinfeld make similar jokes before. I think I heard something like this on Dr. Katz a decade ago. I make the same kind of jokes when I play Twister (Probably why no one will play with me any more...)! So what? Do you want every joke that is Twister-related to be about monks playing the game to practice yoga!? Cause that'd be the only way not to be fucking derivative when make a Twister joke. This is funny, not plagiarized, and well-written. That's all it needs to be featured. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:24, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
- The Onion has done everything. The fact that what I wrote is superficially similar to something they did nearly a decade ago seems like a shitty reason to vote against. -- ugly Ape (lather) (Riot Porn) 11:01, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
- How are multiple people familiar with the same oddly specific Onion piece done all the way back in 2001? That's what I want to know. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:57, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Do you believe something sinister to be afoot? mAttlobster. (hello) 23:05, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
*abstain. 87.236.134.210 15:12, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Self-nom and for First thing I wrote in quite a while. -- 
Pacman. Been there, and therefore, haven't done that. 
Against. I question the wisdom of highlighting an article that is basically the exact same joke that the onion did 9 years ago. 
16:39, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
16:39, June 11, 2010 (UTC)