Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Evidence of Yeti's existence remains elusive

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:Evidence of Yeti's existence remains elusive (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Evidence of Yeti's existence remains elusive	Score: 5 Reinhold Messners
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:15, 2 January 2011
For: 7	Nom+For. No reason. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:15, 2 January 2011 Self-For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:19, January 2, 2011 (UTC) Damn you, Sock. Here I am trying to create this page, not realising that Guildy has changed the title and getting all upset as to why it won't work, then when I finally get it right it says "page already exists". You're cruising for a bruising, son. Anyway, for. --Black Flamingo 17:23, January 2, 2011 (UTC)  For. Good piece of work. Yes, the discovery of a footprint-shaped mud impression is definitely worth mentioning on the front page. Btw, I'm not sure, but I have an idea: Maybe it's better to include the fact that SOME kind of discovery was made in the title, since this discovery is very much a key component of the article in that it keeps the scientists hope up (if this is not the case and the scientists would keep looking anyway, the discovery is dispensable for the article). Maybe something like this: Clue pointing at Yeti's existence discovered, but evidence remains elusive. Because with the present title, it suggests that they haven't found ANYTHING but are still motivated to continue their expeditions. Not that this is bad, but as I said, the discoveries would then be dispensable. But that's just my thoughts. Schamschi  For. and  another "Damn you Socky" just for fun Good page! And Schamschi, maybe put the long comments in, ah, the comment section, and help us out by creating a user page so we can get to your talk page with a link. Thanks. Aleister 20:33 2 1 '11 For. Lovely. -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 12:57, January 3, 2011 (UTC) Misinformation at its finest. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 22:11, 6 January, 2011 (UTC) 22:11, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 2	Against. Ugh, sorry for all the against votes lately, but this is a short article that seems to ride on one joke - "The History Channel makes stupid shows about sending people off to discover shit that isn't real." And I just feel like that's a bit of observational comedy in the vein of "Airline food sucks." pillow talk 19:37, January 4, 2011 (UTC) Against. ^^This^^. --UU - natter 12:06, Jan 18
Comments	Comment. @Aleister: There you go. Damn you Aleister! Schamschi Want a nice image for it too? Spruce it up a bit? --Black Flamingo 21:16, January 2, 2011 (UTC) Done. Schamschi

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH