Uncyclopedia:VFH/Shakespeare Authorship Debate

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Shakespeare Authorship Debate (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Shakespeare Authorship Debate	Score: 11 for votes (bored of scoretext gags now)
Nominated by:	Black flamingo
For: 11	N+F. An excellent new piece from User:Shakespeare (whether or not he's a sockpuppet of User:Francis Bacon remains to be seen). --Black Flamingo 11:03, October 4, 2010 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:09, 4 October 2010 For. YES! Funnybony    11:26, Oct 4 11:26, October 4, 2010 (UTC)  Oh Yeah Read this last week and came very close to nomming it. It's very good and ranks with the best we've had to offer for awhile. Twenty thumbs up. My candidate for Shakespeare is TOAST. Aleister the history fan 12:35 4 10 For.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:57, October 4, 2010 (UTC)  For. Yeah. *stumbles off* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101005 - 02:30 (UTC) Strong For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:04, October 5, 2010 (UTC) For. This sort of follows the line of edits in the Shakespeare article but expands them a lot more. A feature. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:35, October 5, 2010 (UTC) Forsooth. --UU - natter 11:54, Oct 6 Alack. ChiefjusticeGameBoy 12:30, October 6, 2010 (UTC) For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  18:38, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.