Uncyclopedia:VFH/Scam letter

Article: Scam letter	Score: 5.5 MILLION DOLLARS TO BE TRANSFERRED TO YOUR ACCOUNT
Nominated by:	Nominally Humane! 05:20 20 Mar
For: 10.5	And another one I had lying around. Nominally Humane! 05:20 20 Mar For. Mattsnow 18:34, March 20, 2012 (UTC) For. Funny bony 19:20, Mar 20 19:20, March 20, 2012 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:02, 21 March 2012 For. Lolz were had. Fe⁺³ AlFe⁺² 03:46, March 21, 2012 (UTC) For.. Overall, the article is decent, but the fact that the "forward" button posts a new letter to your talk page is a brilliant bit of code. QuackOfaThousandSuns (talk) 17:00, March 21, 2012 (UTC) Per QuackOfaThousandSuns (one of the best usernames here) (not here, on this page, here, as in generally around) Aleister 13:43 23-3-'12 For. 2.24.236.172 20:39, March 23, 2012 (UTC) lol nice -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 19:56, March 28, 2012 (UTC) For. I like it, i especially like the added bonus of the forward/reply etc. buttons, however i sorta wish there was more than one action for these, perhaps a little more content through these would be a good idea. I still like it as-is however. ¶ 13:32, March 31, 2012 (UTC) For. Seems very familiar in places... ChiefjusticeXBox 09:29, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against. 206.219.153.82 18:19, March 20, 2012 (UTC) There's nothing original here. This is incredibly overused and sounds like an actual scam letter, except it's not funny because it's not real. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:12, March 20, 2012 (UTC) Perhaps the most overused concepts on the site, and a difficult one to make truly funny at that 112.187.239.21 19:35, March 24, 2012 (UTC) Against. kinda expected... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:04, March 24, 2012 (UTC) Against. But only becaue I actually lost money because of this article. -- 07:20, April 7, 2012 (UTC) Against. The picture of Paxman did get a smirk out of me at the end, and it's a clever article, but not enough giggles or sniggers to vote for. Mr N 22:44, Apr 13
Comments	Usually when someone includes the word "enema" I chuckle, but it seemed really out of place here. Usually a scam letter is written in some other language, then poorly translated into English. Plus, there is usually a bunch of gibberish that makes no sense then other to make the article sound more official... like confusing corporate talk, or just mind boggling bullshit. Plus, it seems way to obvious it is a scam, it would be funnier for someone with intelligence to work out it's a scam letter, rather then it be pretty obvious even to a Texan. I just think the article could be a lot better.---Maniac1075^{Complain Here} 12:27, March 23, 2012 (UTC) I have nothing but good feelings towards Texas. Although the first porn I ever saw was Debbie does Dallas II, so that may explain it. Nominally Humane! 12:33 23 Mar 12:33, March 23, 2012 (UTC) Ok, i'll change it to Tasmanian's then. I've never seen Debbie Does Dallas II, is it any good? Does it compete as a sequel, or is a "the original was better" thing?---Maniac1075^{Complain Here} 03:16, March 24, 2012 (UTC) I saw them out of sequence. The plot has a few interesting twists in it. Starts to feel like an M. Night Shyamalan production. I would suggest avoiding Debbie Does Dallas:The Next Generation though. Patrick Stewart is good but he's no Eric Edwards. Nominally Humane! 04:14 24 Mar Yes, next generation will never be as widely recognized as the original. ... feel me up, Scotty.---Maniac1075^{Complain Here} 13:10, March 24, 2012 (UTC)