Uncyclopedia:VFH/Metrosexual

Article: Metrosexual	Score: 3 sexual arousals
Nominated by:	~ 20:07, September 13, 2009 (UTC)
For: 11	Nomfor. A 2006 poo lit winner, that never got a feature status. Short and sweet. ~ 20:07, September 13, 2009 (UTC) For. Most definitely. Staircase CUN^t 20:25, September 13, 2009 (UTC) 4 trains going into tunnels. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:42, 13 September 2009 For. IronLung 00:42, September 14, 2009 (UTC) For. Because puns are clever. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 12:50, September 14, 2009 (UTC) For. Cleaver & Funny!!! Funnybony 19:05, September 14, 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, September 16, 2009 (UTC) Weak For - The concept is funny, and the article is well-written. I still think it should have been longer and funnier, though. Rbp olsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 16:10, September 17, 2009 (UTC) For. I laughed, so yeah. ChiefjusticeDS 21:47, September 17, 2009 (UTC) For. GBA2005 (talk) Join Us 19:06, September 20, 2009 (UTC) For. I laughed. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 06:54, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 8	Weak Against. Left me feeling dissatisfied. There were a few funny bits, but it seemed too short and didn't address bits of metrosexuality that I thought were going to be in the article. :/ • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:16, Sep 14 Well you've got an idea However it feels like there is more room for expansion, it seems to skirt around going into any great depth and I didn't get the origins part. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:14, September 14, 2009 (UTC) Another weak against. I thought the Freud/Jung thing was fucking hilarious. I thought everything else was a bit of a mess. pillow talk 22:21, September 14, 2009 (UTC) Against. Goes off the rails after a great start *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 20:37, September 15, 2009 (UTC) against. this is a 2006 gem with a solid concept. it needs work before a feature, though. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:29, September 23, 2009 (UTC) Against*. Per all of the above, really - this could and should be brilliant, and in places it is, just not in enough places. --UU - natter 16:07, Sep 24* Against. per above. --Mn-z 05:09, September 26, 2009 (UTC) Weak against. With rewriting and fixes ("underground underground" "young human couple, believed to be a white person") I can see this being featured. But not now. Could use a good Pee Review. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 13:37, September 27, 2009 (UTC)