Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Write a Techno Song

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

HowTo:Write a Techno Song (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: HowTo:Write a Techno Song	Score: -4.5 repeated musical motifs
Nominated by:	Guildensternenstein 14:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
For: 5	Nom & For. Continuing my long, proud tradition of servicing myself and self-nominating one of my own articles. Yeah, I know. I am pretty great. Pee reviews are here and here. --Guildensternenstein 14:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Weak f♥r. It's a little weak, but I like techno music so I giggled. —Sir SysRq (talk) 14:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC) For It's obviously a one trick pony, but it's a good trick and sums up techno (which I also like) perfectly. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:02, 6 Mar For. Cause I like it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Holy Crap! Thought there would be more support than this. Im for it, its funny, but you knew that--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 20:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Against: 9.5	Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Against original idea but feels cheap. --Kit talk 15:59 6 March Against Its a great idea, not enough content for me though. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 16:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC) against. i kinda like it, but not enough for a feature. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk17:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Sorry dude it was funny, true, and original, but the lack of content makes this more of a funny side read than front page material ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Unfortunately, I've got to stick with my philosophy that a feature should be a good ten-minute time waster for the office drones who want to take a ten-minute break and come here. This is funny, but reading it took me 90 seconds. pillow talk 20:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Against I'd like to listen to this article. OrangeAipom 00:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC) Against. 67.86.10.205 01:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC) Against Although there is an unparalleled second degree of comedy in this to where the article is a repetition of a common joke, about something that is repetitious, which is indeed the butt of the joke being repeated. I hope that didn't sound as mean as it looks now that I've typed it all out. -RAHB 03:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC) Against. per hyperbole. This article is a one trick pony. Although, it is a good article Mnb'z 03:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain.. I'm evenly divided on this one. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:04, Mar 6 Yeah, it is sorta lacking in the content department, but that's kinda the whole point haha. --Guildensternenstein 18:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Which makes it funny, but not featurable in my opinion ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 18:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH