From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: HowTo:Write a Progressive Rock Song
|
Score: 12.5 obscure band references
|
| Nominated by:
|
• • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 11:54, Feb 21 2010
|
For: 12.5
|
- Nom&For. I love this article. By Guildy, it is a well-researched, fully realized satire on progressive rock. I laughed muchly. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 11:54, Feb 21 2010
- Self-For. I once saw this mentioned in a forum here. It made me quite happy. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:08, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Where? I didn't see it anywhere on that link. Che
 } 23:26,21February,2010
- I believe either EMC or Cheevers wrote an UnSignpost piece about what other internet folk thought of Uncyc. a while back--I saw it on the forum page that article linked to. I'm not about to dig out that UnSignpost or search for that particular forum, though. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:16, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Lazy. Che } 11:57,23February,2010
 For. Oh yes :) --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 15:23 EST 21 Feb, 2010- Four They say Zappa never did drugs. What a shame. Good page, it learned me good, and I'd like to see Doc's jokes he wanted to see. Oh yeah, Dark Side of the Moon. ~
  22:16 21 Feb. MMX
 Oh I thought this had already been featured... Che } 23:38,21February,2010- For. No need to even read the article to vote for Guildy. But I read it and it was super! BIG 4 Funnybony 07:21, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Solid Guildy presentation which may not appeal to everyone but this actually a well written article. It may concentrate too much on King Crimson but otherwise I think it is feature worthy.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:06, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
- King Crimson
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 21:47, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
- For. ChiefjusticePS3 23:38, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:25, 23 February 2010
- For. 67.183.17.238 07:12, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- For --Sog1970 08:26, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- For. When you shamelessly whored this page in the first pee review I ever got, I was surprised it wasn't featured back when it was first nommed. ~
     12:09, Feb 23, 2010 12:09, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain.I do like this but I feel that the subject hasn't been properly exploited. (Translation: I'm an old fucker who fancied himself as "Mr Progressive Rock Drummer" back in the 80's and I didn't see the jokes I wanted to see). Don't let that spoil your fun and do read the article if you haven't already.--   12:21, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Meh. Half the humour is based on repetition, King Crimson, and repetition, and the other half is factual information. It comes together nicely, but... it's just missing the funny. IronLung 08:20, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Those of you that like this article should check out (if you haven't already) this, for the possible mutual interest if nothing else. No whoring on my part here. Nope. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:16, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. Oh yes :) --
Oh I thought this had already been featured... 
Abstain.I do like this but I feel that the subject hasn't been properly exploited. (Translation: I'm an old fucker who fancied himself as "Mr Progressive Rock Drummer" back in the 80's and I didn't see the jokes I wanted to see). Don't let that spoil your fun and do read the article if you haven't already.--
18:13, February 23, 2010 (UTC)