From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Google
|
Score: -0.5 Googols
|
| Nominated by:
|
Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 23:10, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
|
For: 5
|
- It's a fun one. Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 23:10, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
 For. I like gimmick articles, I guess. Gammakid999 Have a Holly Jolly!(meth) 00:49, 2 December 2025 (UTC) For. yeah. ๐ gergdown ๐ โ๏ธ 00:52, 2 December 2025 (UTC)- For. I also like gimmick articles. Fenris2010 the moccasin-wearing Grue You hear growling... • Join the Empire! 18:36, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- For. Mr. George
 / talk 18:14, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- For. Oแญรถแแแแ
 Squaw Dee is Santa's ninth reindeer! (๐ฆ๐๐ถ๐๐
๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ธ๐๐ โณ๐ ๐ฒ๐พโฏ๐โฏ๐) 15:21, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
|
Against: 5.5
|
 Against. Look, it's a well made replica of google search, but the AI image really bugs me and there is basically nothing to see past the first page and the two links below the search bar.  13:21, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Also something i'd like to note since i didn't notice earlier: this article looks atrocious on mobile. Like, it's really bad. 10:36, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- Against per Alula
 Turb0-Sunrise de la YANKEES SUCK! 13:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Against. the article isn't bad, but to be featurable it needs something more than just a parody of the Google front page. ๐๐๐DaniPine3 (talk)๐๐๐ 16:48, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Against. The article isn't that bad, but we need to be realistic. How do you feature it? There's no first paragraph of text to put into the featured paragraph part of the main page, and it relies on formatting which is simply impossible in the featured article part of the main page. Buv, 20:12, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Half Against. I see the vision and i love goofy gimmick pages as much as the next person, but it feels a bit undercooked as is and could do with some more subpages. โ๏ธSystemPhantom, with a ๐watermelon for you! (talk)โ๏ธ 05:14, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Against. due to the collab in the works. ๐ gergdown ๐ โ๏ธ 21:45, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
Yeah I see the points. What if offset1 was rewritten to be an article about Google, and that was featured instead (if it gets nominated) somehow? Offset1 could use more content anyway Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 17:10, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- @DaniPine3:No it doesn't. That's just your opinion, which is perfectly fine to have, but that's still just an opinion, not a rule. Fenris2010 the moccasin-wearing Grue You hear growling... • Join the Empire! 01:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Fenris2010: It's true that it's not a rule, but I do see their point - there's not much actual text to be featured... There's a bunch of ways to feature it though. Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 01:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
@Buv: see this. ๐ gergdown ๐ โ๏ธ 23:06, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- I've got a better idea, a solution to the problems - what if Offset1 was turned into an article about Google? Complete with the cards from offset2, etc. And that gets featured Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 23:09, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Not keen to support this. Too much of a headache. ShabiDOO 01:24, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Update: To try and mitigate issues with featuring this, I reorganized the pages so there's actually something to feature. Feel free to edit, but there's no pressure.
Hope it helps somewhat Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 03:16, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. I like gimmick articles, I guess. 
Against. Look, it's a well made replica of google search, but the AI image really bugs me and there is basically nothing to see past the first page and the two links below the search bar. 
