Forum:Poopsmith
I was looking at this template (Template:Poopsmith), which allows non-admins to remove things from VFD, and I think this is a good template. But one problem, there's only one poopsmith, and he hasn't contributed for about 7 months. Shouldn't we get some more people, as well as new ones? --AAA! (AAAA) 05:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
You know, it should just be more than VFD. Pages like VFH and VFP should also require a poopsmith to get rid of failed nominations, or to archive successful ones. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- We should have a Poopsmith of the Month. Winner gets to be poopsmith for the next month. --EMC [TALK] 07:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- So wait, you think VFD is so bad that we need a poopsmith to archive the voting? —Braydie 12:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Shitshoveller of the Month? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Why not Gong Farmer? Then people can have the amazed look as they think that it is a good thing when in reality they shovelled shit. 13:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Shitshoveller of the Month? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
What's up with people not being happy being regular users? Why would you want to have to clean out vfd etc? Also, it's unnecessary, our bitches newest admins are doing a great job of that already. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 16:09, 18 Feb 2007
- I actually agree with Spang. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 16:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- So do I, but it's either get some more poopsmiths or just delete the template. And I don't like deletion. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hypocrite. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think AAA! would make a good poopsmith after all - he doesn't like deletion, so he'll have to take all the poop home with him and store it in a great big smelly pile. :) --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- So do I, but it's either get some more poopsmiths or just delete the template. And I don't like deletion. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against That's Braydie's job. --The Zombiebaron 02:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- :D —Braydie 16:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- This officially marks the historic 10,000th use of a sideways umlauted U with a completing line at the top, otherwise known as a :D, by Braydie. We hope him a long life and many more :Ds to come. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- What a wierd hobby...keeping track of :D's...you need a job or something. --The Zombiebaron 00:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nah, I employed him to do it. :D —Braydie 15:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- What a wierd hobby...keeping track of :D's...you need a job or something. --The Zombiebaron 00:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- This officially marks the historic 10,000th use of a sideways umlauted U with a completing line at the top, otherwise known as a :D, by Braydie. We hope him a long life and many more :Ds to come. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Apps for the Poopy
- I would like to apply for poopsmith status. goshzillacorrespondence 20:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)!
- Second --AAA! (AAAA) 00:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- So would I. -- 00:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I nominate Braydie. --The Zombiebaron 00:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I accept your challenge Zombiemaster, what will it be old chap? Pistols at dawn? —Braydie 06:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Slapfight after naptime.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- We ussually slap each other during "naptime", you know what I "mean", eh? --The Zombiebaron 02:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Slapfight after naptime.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I accept your challenge Zombiemaster, what will it be old chap? Pistols at dawn? —Braydie 06:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I thought this was the line for Stones tickets.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I apply. -- 02:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Me too. I want anonymous IPs to come scream their disapproval at me on my talk page. -- 08:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Admins don't need to be poopsmiths. They've already got that in their sysop ability. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- As would I, and immediate placement of the template on Ghelae's page, somewhere near a userbox for maximum feung-shuie [sic].--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 20:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I would like to apply to be poop. Wait, did I leave something out? No, I don't think so. --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- I want to apply because I want to have trolls screaming at me so I can laugh at them and make examples of them. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 19:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, I was just wondering if the people above actually became poopsmiths in the end. I couldn't help but notice that VFD is full again, so I'd like to be a poopsmith too. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note that prodding an admin will usually get vfd cleared... • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:19, 20 Mar 2007
- I'll apply too -- 21:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Application Submission Here. Am I wrong?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- You're late... this is a bumped old topic. --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
It's not happening!!!!11twofoursixeightwhodoweappreciateBrrraydie
—Braydie 09:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)