User talk:Starnestommy/Ct

This is the funniest thing I have ever read to date! --General Insineratehymn 01:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

The critics are saying "No! Bad article! Scat! Self-indulgent. In-jokey. Leet-ridden", but we disagree! --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 02:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

My version's better! :P -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

If anyone cares the talk page is archived Here --~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

02:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Best article since [[Fisher Price]] and [[Redundant]]. DJ Mixerr 22:35, March 22, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

Ct

Vote: Ct	Score: -4 penus in the mouf of teh vote0rz!!!!11Opjveroliprobmoi23
Nomination:	Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 01:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 6	Nom and For - Contents, the second coming! Feature!!! --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 01:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC) I support, even though I didn't think you were genuinely serious about featuring. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Are you talking to me? --THINKER 01:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Are you talking to me? --~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 01:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Yes, please. --General Insineratehymn 01:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Feature! It angered me with its existence earlier, but now that it's up here, it should sooo be featured.--Andorin Kato 02:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 10	you can't slam a bunch of keys and call it an article --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC) No. This article is a piece of junk. Brianrein 01:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC) I was going to vote "For" as a joke... but then I realized it might actually get featured. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 01:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC) No. You're being stupid. Stop being stupid. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC) <Garison>"Well I don't know, Starnestommy, did you ask Mr. Hat?" <Mr. Hat>"NO! You go to Hell! You go to Hell and YOU DIE!"--Sir Shandon 02:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC) No Stupider than the original Contents. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 02:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Against - Stupid & NRV'ed. Famine approved. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Against. -- Mitch 02:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Strong Against 1. because its rubbish. 2. because the ranting on IRC about it made me leave the room. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:21, 29 May 2007 No! Bad article! Scat! Self-indulgent. In-jokey. Leet-ridden. YouFang 02:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Uh.. in-jokey? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC) "Go eat shit fuckers" --~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 02:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Comment Come on, think of the reskinning possibilities! This is worth featuring just for the amazingly long quote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC) i'm sorry, go back to the pub, that's where drunk people belong --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)