User talk:Multiliteralist/Archive003

You should consider whether it is appropriate to continue editing this page. -- Style  Guide 19:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Multiliteralist, and thanks for joining Uncyclopedia! Before editing further, please take a gander at our Beginner's Guide. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, check out the following pages:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
• Votes for Highlight Page - read the very best articles and have your say about what goes onto our front page

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, feel free to ask me on my talk page, ask at the community forum or in the chatroom, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, our Adopt-a-Noob program can bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian!  -- The Zombiebaron 19:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

That was the most imaginative talk page rape to date. -- Style  Guide 19:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Winner!

	Foolitzer Prize Winner April 2013

 Sir Peasewhizz Biblio HOS Awards 20:11 5.01.13

I won!

Dear friends! I have no words to Style  Guide 20:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Yo Big M!

So it seems that Strainj1 fled :/ Here's (<-) da raw-version of the granny-article anyways, it has some grammar mistakes and needs some trimming, altough some extra-jokes wouldn't hurt. If you have time to check it out, it'd be really cool. I mean, Strainj1 hasn't made an edit for the last 2 weeks so if you'd check it instead? I left the ending open, as you wished, and I can really see different UnNews about it coming to my mind. Thanks bro. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 10:39, 5 May, 2013 (UTC)

Testing

Style  Guide 19:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi there Multiliteralist

I am just writing to you to say that I am concerned about one of our users: User:Sir Peasewhizz. His article contributions haven't been great so far and find very little humour. He goes for cheap, noobish humour such as insults and randomness. He destroys the concept of maintaining a parody of wikipedia.

Unfortunately being an IP I can do little about this. Perhaps a word on his talk page will suffice but I doubt he will listen.

In hating the admin Spike (from the other site) and his policies he has ended up instigating his own ruthless rules and eagerness for power. Unfortunately his story on Uncyclopedia so far reminds me of the pigs' story in Animal Farm and now the pigs (Peasewhizz) have turned into the humans (Spike).

I write to you as you seem to understand that his comedy is immature through your comments on pee review. However there are many others on this site who think they are funny in the same way Peasewhizz does, which reflects on the main feature now which almost certainly is a parody of a wikipedia article.

I have made my decision and have decided not to become a user here but go elsewhere. Even with censorship and a strict admin the other site still manages to produce the parody of wikipedia which this site fails to reach. Thank you for your attention. – Preceding unsigned comment added by IP with half a brain (talk • contribs)

I don't give a flying fuck about a "parody of Wikipedia" since the concept is truly old if one sticks with it with a tire iron up one's arse. SirPeaseWhizz is a nice guy, and there's no way in hell I would ever start patroling anyone in any case. The dude is young and it would do no good to start him down the way of regulated humour. That would be a spirit-killer. If your highest aspiration is to reach a parody of an encyclopedia - Uncyclopedia was already there in 2006 or so. Good luck with trying to keep it fresh. Thank you back for your attention. -- Style  Guide 18:55, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Alternate reply

OH MY GOD!! If we don't act now, SirPeaseWhizz will take over this fork and then we will all be fucked! Thank you for warning us!! You saved us!! Unless you had, we would all have to write his kind of immature "humour" or else he would fuck us up the arse like Matt Smith does to Mr-ex in that feature where RAHB imitates SirPeaseWhizz's immature style! Christ! I wish we were as smart as you are! We never saw the danger! I apologise on behalf of all the Fork for not being worthy of your valuable contributions!! I hate us! Why didn't I listen to Spike while I still had a chance? Now I'm doomed to being un-encyclopedic for the rest of my so-called comedic career and everyone will laugh at my pathetic writing attempts! I cannot even make a decent user page! I'll kill myself! Get me some sleeping pills, someone! -- Style  Guide 19:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Think on your sins and you did. You thought on them! Took you awhile to get the farce - as they say but now that you've got it it's good to have you back. I hope you won't take too much away from that saga. If you need any pee reviews needed reviewing then just let me know. Did some for Peasey awhile back but that was when I was still in on the joke. Parodying idiots is fun! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Friendly IP (talk • contribs)

Took me a while? Yeah of course, about half a second. Are you sober? -- Style  Guide 16:46, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

A day=half a second. Sorry just writing that down in my Uncyclopedia translator so I remember for next time. On the contrary sir, are you drunk? Replying to my jokes as if they weren't jokes. Read my above comment, I explain it all. – Preceding unsigned comment added by IP Guy (talk • contribs)

No no - you got it wrong yourself. My mom wrote the previous one and you never spotted that. -- Style  Guide 17:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Ah! I see, we're on the case (well onto something!). So you've been enlightened we've reasoning. No more of that ED talk of not understanding a joke on a humour website. Right then where were we...well here really. So what can I do for you Mr. Multilingual? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheery IP (talk • contribs)

PS - Did your mum write about the bit with the Vodka? Because if so then I think she wants to kill herself. Just a warning to you!

Oh dear not got an article on pee review? No reference to any on your user page. Ever written anything on this website? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Inquisitive IP (talk • contribs)

I would be delighted if she finally did. Who are you, again? And no, no I haven't. I have just a user page and a talk page. -- Style  Guide 17:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Oh cool. So basically you don't have to put anything in and you get lots out. Socialism to its extreme. I like it. I'm a person when I last looked in the mirror (unfortunately the mirror broke so I can't look again). – Preceding unsigned comment added by IP person (talk • contribs)

AND VODKA!! GET ME SOME VODKA!!

Get me some whiskey now! Or gin! Or a knife! Remember the sleeping pills! This is the end! I'm a total failure! We all are! Who had the idea of uniting under Zombiebaron?! This is a suck!! Just kill me already! -- Style  Guide 19:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Where's the vodka you wankers??!!!

WHERE IS IT???? -- Style  Guide 19:32, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

WHER ARE TEH SLEEPING PILLS!!!!!!!!!!!

THIS IS NOT FUNNY WHY AM I SUCH A RETARDR???????????????????? -- Style  Guide 19:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

PLS Judging

I'm sending you this because you signed up to judge the Poo Lit Surprise. If you no longer want to judge or are incapable of doing so, please tell me as soon as possible. If you're still good to go then here are the instructions:

First, read all of the articles and look at all of the images submitted. Second, judge them. Judge how you like, as long as it's at least fair and based on merit (one suggestion would be to use the Pee Review format). You, as the judges, have the sole authority to pick losers, winners, and disqualify entries, so please read the PLS rules carefully before judging.

Post your top 5 entries here for all categories except the Best T-shirt Design. For the Best T-shirt Design category just say which ones should be t-shirts and which ones should not be t-shirts.

Hit me up on my talk page if you have any questions and thank you again for your valued participation in the balletic train wreck that is the Poo Lit Surprise! --EMC ^[TALK] 03:43 May 12 2013

Hi Multiliteralist, thank you for your feedback on the contributions to the Poo Lit Surprise contest, that is very useful. However, as it is so explicit, I am afraid it may influence other jury members. Various T-shirt designs have been dismissed at a very early stage already this way, to give an example, or at least so it seems. Cheers. Flyingbird (talk) 16:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Bribe

IFYMB! has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

C'mon, you know you want to... IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 17:41 13 May 2013

From the Chief

I'm having internet connection problems that are keeping me from getting on IRC. At least at any other time but 16:00-23:00 UCT. Add to that my school work has all but driven me to polyphasic sleep. To that end, I ask that you grit your teeth a little longer before I have the "From the Chief" rewrite out at some point this week. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 04:07, May. 14, 2013

Your Inefficiency

I am very confused, sir, you have not replied? Am I a lost cause of insanity left to roam your talk page and scare any whocome by it like a troll under a bridge or am I an actual person? Your thoughts, if you may, please. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Confused IP (talk • contribs)

Are you actually having fun? Style  Guide 20:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Oh jolly good fun, sir, jolly good. Reminder: Didn't answer my above comment and questions. Thanks. – Preceding unsigned comment added by IP jolly glad to see you back and in good condition sir (talk • contribs)

Don't I often answer questions with questions? -- Style  Guide 20:26, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes but I answer questions with answers. So you haven't written an article yet but you want to collaborate on one? Seems a bit hasty to me. – Preceding unsigned comment added by IP advisor (talk • contribs)

Maybe. Style  Guide 20:33, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps. So what do you actually do here? – Preceding unsigned comment added by IP who's filling up your talk page (talk • contribs)

Currently I'm trying to find out whether you're Llwy or not. I'll go with "not" but I'm not sure. Style  Guide 20:39, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps. Now we're getting somewhere (I've said that twice now haven't I?). We both have a nagging dilema. Your's is whether I'm a user in disguise or not and mine is when you are going swing the ban stick and why you haven't yet (not that I'm asking for one it's just you seem to avoid the answers to my questions as though you distrusted me). – Preceding unsigned comment added by Clever IP (talk • contribs)

This is too innocent for a ban but unless it either gets more interesting or you tell me who you are I'll be bored. Also I have no banstick. -- Style  Guide 20:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm pretty bored. Got any suggestions on what to do? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Bored IP (talk • contribs)

Let me know who you are, get on the IRC and we'll have a blast reminiscing this discussion. Or with anything else. -- Style  Guide 20:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

I've told you I'm a person, do I need tell you more? (I have more to tell!) – Preceding unsigned comment added by I'm an IP (talk • contribs)

I should say so. Are you going to, and when? I'm soon out of here for today. -- Style  Guide 20:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

You said I was doomed to fail!!! Never. I shall be back tomorrow. – Preceding unsigned comment added by IP who never gives up (talk • contribs)

Tell you tomorrow. All right?

That doesn't yet prove you actually are Llwy... OK in any case. Night. -- Style  Guide 21:04, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Mornin' all. So you seem to have the same time zone as me but yet you comprehend a different language. Why is this or that? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Linguistic IP (talk • contribs)

Oh a Yank living in Finland. I see. Gosh, the more we talk the more I know about you the less you know about me. – Preceding unsigned comment added by The IP who knows stuff (talk • contribs)

Like the sig?  —Adopt-A-Noob

I have more to tell about my own exploits but when one is not around secrets can be lost.  —Adopt-A-Noob

I have created a user page with the answer to your questions on. However by the time you read this it would have been deleted (IPs are not allowed to make user pages) and I will be banned for at least a few weeks so bye. Sorry the secrets will not be told.  —Adopt-A-Noob

A request from a friend

Multilingual, you've always been a good friend to me ever since I did my first joke on this wiki, you mistaked it for vandalism and prevented me from replying that it wasn't on your talk page. The fact that you only blocked me for a week shows compassion for IPs. Show and share that compassion by signing up here. Thanks  —Adopt-A-Noob

I actually didn't block you since I'm not an admin. The joke wasn't terribly funny but it didn't actually suck either - not much that is. It could have been one ScottPat from the Uncyclowikia site and I still think it could be. Whichever way, you could just as well quit this thing you're doing, create a username and start writing something actually funny. That's all I have to say on the matter. -- Style  Guide 14:09, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Wow! That's quite agressive, don't you think. I come here to help promote IP rights and you hound me down and force me to become a member. My user page just got deleted, which I will deal with. We've got to stick together in these troubled times.  —Adopt-A-Noob

Yeah. What you are doing is a pretty OK attempt. It just fails because it's an in-joke among some Uncyclopedia editors and one IP. The former group fails to laugh their asses off, I'm certain. So then. Just register a user name because this is already a bit boring. -- Style  Guide 14:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

This is no joke, sir. Joking finished a while ago. Remember when I told you. This is about spreading equal rights for IPs. This project is inniating on many other wikis. I have been put incharge of it here. I have set it up as a party to integrate it into your Uncyclopedia-style system. Please take it seriously or we will have to cross this site off as being IP friendly.  —Adopt-A-Noob

Boring. -- Style  Guide 14:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

If you do not like this system. Tough. I am campaigning here for IP rights whether you believe in it or not. Any further questions may be raised on my talk page. Thank you.  —Adopt-A-Noob

Boring. -- Style  Guide 14:48, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

43

My userspace article, User:Llwy-ar-lawr/43, will contain the final version when I get to it. Good night now. (Or, as we say in Welsh, nos da.) – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) Uncyclopedia is a community site that anyone can contribute to. Discover, share and add your knowledge! UncyclopediaUncyclopediaIllogicopediai:fr:LogimalpediePaudurapedyjaFrithchiclipeidUncapaediaAbsurdopediaScotypedia 21:13, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Want to be my new adoptee?

Since my former mentor left and since you're some kind of literary genius, I figured you could be my new role model/mentor and help me become a better writer. So are you up for it? RedHot (talk) 04:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

ARGH I'm not a... OK, I'm a literary genius. What would it involve? You ask me questions and I help? I would do that without being an... adoptee? -- Style  Guide 04:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Well, you would help mentor me through using Uncyclopedia better and make my writings into decent feature quality works. At least that what I think happens. RedHot (talk) 04:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Can't help you with grammar much: English is only my second language and I'll just go with what I know is correct. If I started advising I would just give you my own limited style which cannot be the purpose. Also, helping with grammar is very boring. Deal with that part on your own. I don't know what else I could do: I just write articles. If you have specific questions about the wiki, others like Zombiebaron, RAHB, Hotadmin4u69 know better. -- Style  Guide 05:02, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

...and, of course, I'll give tips on possible ways to improve articles. But I mainly outlined to you most of my general ideas on IRC the other day. Style  Guide 05:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Yet another half-baked PLS article

Now that I'm done reverting that pesky vandal (from several IP's) that hit the other site, and protecting most of the old forums hit, I should have more time to visit here a little more often. Did you really mean what you said about collaborating on my contribution to the PLS? I would consider a rewrite, but not sure how to even go about outlining it, since the current outline did turn out a bit tedious to read. Also, I don't want it to actually be too much of an attack (since I come from a Christian background), just more a matter of ridiculing certain expressions that are overused. I'd like it to be something funny to both Christians and non-Christians, if this is possible. A second point of view might help here. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 20:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Of course I was being serious. I'll read it and try to remember what I was thinking. -- Style  Guide 20:13, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Style  Guide 20:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

---

Per our conversation on IRC, I started my rewrite here: User:Simsilikesims/My First Church Service. I am now out of ideas as to how to fix it further. I couldn't figure out how to fit in the Mongolian angle, so I pretty much left it out. Feel free to help edit it. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

About that yesterday's conversation

So I gave a thought about that RAM Ones-idea you suggested yesterday (I know, I should not think) and... Uh, found it impossible. I know my limits, and I know how hard it is to write articles about bands, as I wrote an article about Primus with Roman Dog Bird last year. It didn't end up terribly (mainly because Bird's help) but it was a pain in the ass, and the writing took almost a year :D And I'm not very good at writing about real subjects in an encyclopedic way anyways, so I gave up on this before I even started. Yeaj, pretty pathetic, I knoe. However, I loved your idea of what RAM stands for, that Rabid Arse Movement, so I thought of writing about a different meaning of REM. I cleared through my dictionary for inspiration for words starting with the e-letter, and thought of all kinds of different names. I chose my three personal fauvorites from the list which were:

• Rabid Edam/Emmental Movement - something insane related to cheese, I don't know yet will it be Edam or Emmental. I thought of writing a fucking random thing about cheese living and moving after certain conditions are met. Like when the best before-date is over or something. Or maybe if drugs are involved...? Like trippy cheese? :D Or what about gene-manipulated cheese, evolving into a monster or such? There's tons of different ideas to think of.

• Rabid Emu Movement - pretty similar like the one before, something to do with drugs? That could even be an UnBooks, like some drugger goes on the worst trip ever, seeing and meeting a rabidly moving emu. It could work well as an Alice in Wonderland parody, with all kinds of insane things, but mostly focusing on the rabid emu. Or rabbit emu? It could also be something weird of emus' natural habits, like some weird emu-panic attack. Tons of ideas here too.

• Rabid Ear Movement - Haven't much thought of this, but it could be something of, uh, rabid ear movement? :D I have to think more of this, during the writing time I have not enough ideas yet, if you'd have any it'd be cool.

So why the hell am I typing all this here? Because I really can't decide which one to write of :/ All of those has good material to expand and since I already have some ideas I could write about any of those. And that I have different ideas of different ideas (lol) which idea of an idea to choose? One option is also that I write all of those, but I'm not in the mood of writing-marathon right now. Since you /kind of/ gave the idea to write about these to me, I'd want you to choose which one. I mean, if you dare to. OR, alternatively, create more, better ideas to write of with another e-word replacing the previous ones, if those do not satisfy you enough. And if all are wroten, could this be somehow be a part of SoS? Altough the subjects are all different, they could be somehow linked together. Somehow... But please tell me what you think, I really can't decide on my own. I know that sounds pretty bad for me to ask your opinion on my project and I feel pretty embarrased because of that, but if you possibly could... I'd be grateful, really would. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 04:47, 28 May, 2013 (UTC)

HowTo:Create a platypus

I love that article. Too bad it didn't get featured. InMooseWeTrust (talk) 07:19, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

It would only have stayed on front page for 5 days and everyone would have got fed up with it. -- Style  Guide 07:23, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Featured articles are something to be proud of. It also makes Uncyclopedia look better if more articles are featured, just like it does on Wikipedia. Sometimes I think people on this site don't know a good article when they see one, so a lot of crappy articles get featured and a lot of good ones get deleted. InMooseWeTrust (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Don't I know it. -- Style  Guide 07:43, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Another VFH idea

So, we all know that VFH is not as great as it once was or could be. I'm not suggesting anything radical, but only a minor change which is we lower the goal on VFH from 15 to 10. I don't want to seem like I want to install every idea from the other site, but considering that on a good day we only get up to about halfway, it makes sense to lower the goal bar. Everytime I look at the red space I just feel depressed, and lowering the goal bar has worked for the other site, beacause they have theirs on 4 or 5, yet over here it would work even better beacause we rarely drop behind 6. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 08:30 2 June 2013

VFH voting just sucks in my opinion. I don't think it matters if we have +5 votes per article - or if we have a nomination list out of which someone (a nominated person) just picks an article to be featured. For instance - Matt Smith / buttsex won by landslide. Everyone picked it because it was funny, not because it had QUALITY. This is because QUALITY people didn't show up. One week we might have someone tight choosing the articles and it would not get featured. Next week we would have someone else and it would get featured. There's no difference as far as results go since the voter base is so narrow. In any case, even with a wider voter base, I've seen totally contrary articles get featured during different years or months - all depending on who bothers to vote at a given time. Really the voting serves no real purpose except to promote strife between people who have different ideas of what is funny. With one person choosing the articles we would just have to wait until it's someone else's turn, to get something funnier featured. I won't go anywhere near VFH while it works the way it does now --- I don't want to be reminded how relative comedy is, and how little people care about that as long as they can comment on everything. -- Style  Guide 09:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

This is not possible

"Outside-of-cuntlords idea" you say! Lets hear it. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 18:31 9 June 2013