User talk:Cajek/Archive19

This is the funnyist think I have seen today

Seriously. It's a work of genius. We need to track down this IP and knight him. Fat americans.

Ha, kudos for that find, Mr.N! On another note, sign your bloody posts! Back on track again, I still don't see why the US is the "stupid" country if this is what they write elsewhere. Come on, someone else step up and elect a shitty president so America can look good again. Please? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:34, Dec 23

Yeah, that is pretty funny actually! Dammit, now I have to go to the gym   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 23:36)

Oh God, I'm so fat! *pukes into bucket* - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:38, Dec 23

Oh God, you're so fat! *hungrily grabs a carving knife*   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 23:39)

Just pissed on THE

I was surprised how well you both did! I'm not sure I could have managed to do better myself. I think it was a close thing, but I would say that you just shaved it. Yours was probably slightly funnier, although THE did well. The tittle you had was a bit eaiser to work with I think though, which is probably why it came out the better of the two...

HAVE YOU SEEN the Gay VFH??? I have never seen so many votes against! Guess Fag and me really put the cat in with the pigeons with that one. Wow. MrN 02:32, Dec 24

You have a very colorful way of talking! But anyway, it's good to lose while you're young, and it's hard to win before you have a real group of wins under your belt.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 04:03)

That would not have counted as a feature for me anyway would it? Even if it had got featured? I did not create it. How many votes against??? Maybe I should try a slightly easier topic next time! Maybe, I will try to get Niggers featured or something... I'm joking of course...  :) MrN 04:09, Dec 24

Yes, it would have counted as a half feature for you. I'm pretty sure it would've...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 04:26)

RE your mods to my sig

You could get to my talk page by clicking on the on the far right. Do that not be working for u? Maybe der is a problem wit da sig... MrN 16:01, Dec 24

I didn't even realize that...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 16:11)

More hard stuff to read...

When you thought Hard to read was bad enough, there's worse. I am working on a Hard to read clone--Æ 16:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

AE, instead of writing a whole new article, why don't you just take over Hard to read? I gave up on that thing months ago.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 17:05)

You're done? I don't think I have all that much to add, though I'll try--Æ 17:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually the best advice I can give is not doing anything similar to hard to read. It's my hate child, as my bibliography can testify.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 17:06)

So, should I remove the {{Rf}} on my Double negative article? Also, doing something completley different would take me months to do and it would be worse than yours I'm afraid. Don't count on me completing it--Æ 17:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Personally, I like {{Rf}}: it's perfectly goofy. But instead of writing a nonsense article, I think you should expand your bibliography with real articles. I have a quick and dirty way to do that, now, as you know.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 17:13)

I wrote an actual article yesterday. This one will probably be my final nonsense article, and I'll write a non-nonsense article once I can think of one --Æ 17:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

No, what I'm saying is that to get a quick article, just challenge me if you're online for 30-60 minutes.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 17:17)

That's not going to be today, I'm getting offline in just a second to take a break from the computer and later today, I'm seeing relatives for Christmas Eve. Tommorow maybe?--Æ 17:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Next time we both know that we're both on, how about?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 17:22)

Can I write Why?:Does cajek keep getting banned‎ tommorow in the competition?--Æ 18:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

lol, no for two reasons: first, it's vanity, and second because the competition article is assigned by the other player. Although it sounds intriguing. I won't stop you if you do it, but it would probably get delorted for vanity. You might as well start writing it now if you want, cuz I'm gonna have other articles lined up for the competition.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 18:52)

I tell you what to write, and you tell me what to write. Am I correct?--Æ 18:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Yep! And I got some good ones lined up.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 18:55)

I'll think of some good ideas. In the mean time, can you shout at NXWave for his poor review on UnBooks:The sockpuppet who Cried GAY GAY GAY?--Æ 18:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

You mean the guy that nominated you for gobshitedom came and reviewed your article?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 19:01)

Yep, and he voted against me at NotM (don't really care though)--Æ 19:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I think you've got that award wrapped up. Don't regift it, though.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 19:09)

YOU HAPPY?

There! I'm working on something! Granted, it's just an experiment to see if Ljlego likes it better, and I'll probably end up dumping it and making a third one, but I'M DOING SOMETHING! LEAVE ME ALONE! Merry Christmas! Merry merry merry edits. PEEING 22:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, I was about to not leave you alone, but I'm considering leaving you alone. Also, I'm not happy in the cosmic sense, if that's what you're asking. Thanks for the dental floss   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 24 / 22:39)

Je suis le papa de le bebé

Yes, that's right, I'm the father of this baby: the First. I think it is dang funny, but I need a solid review to be sure of its strengths/weaknesses. Also, I'll be sending you my term paper on Shakespeare shortly, as you do a lovely critiquing job. Thanks for your help monsieur. You are such a patron that I'd make you a Signoir de Nofu if you asked nicely. You surely battle the Nofu (bad reviews) sending it back to the void from which I mine it for profits :D. I fight the Nofu on all fronts.--Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 03:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

NoTM?

Do noms carry over to the next month? Oh, and I'm doing HowTo:Make things more complicated than they already are Could go under either HowTo or Why?.-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 04:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Do you fit the requirements for NotM?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 08:35)

I'm glad you liked one of the ideas up there. I am obligated to pitch in. If I pitch in enough, it'll count as a collaboration. If I do, like, 3/4ths of the thing, then... You know how it works, now.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 08:35)

Yes I do fit the requirements for NotM. And then SomE. Now nominate me dammit!!-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 15:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah, okay! I would agree with that. It's hard to get a feature in the first month of being here! Maybe you could ask daddy to nom you? I would be happy to do it, but he's a way bigger guy around here than I am.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 15:29)

Technically, I have been here for almost as long as daddy has, only my first months were under some dumb name (The Flying Flapjack) and yes it is something to get your first article in VFH featured the first go at it.-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 16:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Can I challenge you...

At 1:00 PM (EST) today. You will write Why?:Crash your car into a stop sign while drunk and I... can I write anything on your list?--Æ 16:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Oops! You announced it! I might be online for an hour. I will have to see @ 10:00 WST. If I am you will receive your topic. If not then I will get an extra day (?) of thinking about why anyone would crash their car into a stop sign while drunk. I'll get you your topic (cuz that's how this works). See you at 1 maybe!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 16:17)

What is my topic?... so I can think about it?--Æ 16:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Hold on, I'm deciding as we speak! Exciting!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 16:23)

Why?:HIDE!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 16:26)

One minute left till the competition? Ready?--Æ 17:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

lol, no I can't do it now. Later this evening! Like 6:00 or so WST! READY?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 18:10)

What time zone, lol?--Æ 18:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

WST = western standard time? I'm on the WEST coast. The best coast.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 18:12)

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNO! That's 9:00 EST and I'm too lazy to compete that late at night. --Æ 18:14, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

oooh! pretty! Okay, tomorrow then!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 18:16)

What time?--Æ 18:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Whenever we're both on for an hour at the same time. We'll figure it out eventually!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 18:17)

Or you all could just move out east/west/weast.-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 07:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

got platoon

hey caj, i'd love to give it a shot. what exactly are you looking for (text-wise)? is it for an article? --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Gerry! Actually yeah, it's for my article Platoon. The text is not very movie-like, I don't think, in terms of how it looks. In terms of what it says, I think it's okay. Do you think there should be a movie-blurb somewhere? My main complaint is that it looks not how it's supposed to. I can't explain it, but it looks very amateurish.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 17:41)

ok, cool. reading the article really helps with what kind of tone you're looking to have the image set. i'll get to work on it.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:05, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Of all the people running for PotM, you're the bestest.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 23:33)

hey again, i've got some preliminary ideas line dup for your image, and just wanted to see which version you think would look best. do you want the text to say "you've got mail", "you've got platoon", or "got platoon"? also, would you rather have the title look more like the you've got mail font, or something like the platoon font (on the original platoon poster), in which i could try to incorporate the dog tags? i'm just spitballin' here, and i thought it would be best to ask you before i really got cracking.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Oooooh! I'm like a kid in an image store! First of all, thank you very much for your work! Well, I want the image to be obvious about what it's parodying. Can you do the last option: "You've Got Mail" in the platoon font with the dog tags? Thank you!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 22:56)

Pee Review

I couldn't justify a full review, since I don't have any pointers, and you'd just set the review on fire and scream "HATE HATE HAT!!!" so I just gave my ideas in short form and left it open for a better reviewer. I think it's up towards the VFH levels, but then again, what do I know. Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 05:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

/me Sympathetically passes Cajek the sheets, pillows and covers, allowing him to perform the necessary actions with the bed before lying in it... :P Dam, I'm helpful today... MrN 05:34, Dec 27

This bed... it's made of regret!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 05:34)

Your doing a good job with it. We just got to make sure we don't shit in it too much. But we are getting there. Pee Review is improving I think... MrN 05:38, Dec 27

This metaphor has taken a very very wrong turn, Mr. N.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 05:40)

Anyhoo. Get another review on it, and if it finds its way onto VFH, I'll be first in line to vote For. Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 05:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Fuck you

I mean, hi! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:41 Dec 27, 2007

heeelllooooo? What'dya want?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 05:42)

Nothin' much. What's going on in your life? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:44 Dec 27, 2007

It appears that some dude nominated this article he wrote all by himself and that it wasn't some other jerkoff in the first place. That's what's going on.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 05:45)

Like brain tumors, I hate when that happens. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:47 Dec 27, 2007

Fuck the mooses. --Charitwo 05:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

No thanks. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:49 Dec 27, 2007

Who'll bring the lube? ...and the hockey mask?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 05:50)

Does mustard work? --Charitwo 05:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

So far, I've never fucked any mammal larger than a pteradactyl.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 05:53)

Hey guys, why weren't you at the movie theater? -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 19:28, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Since everyone seems to be hanging around here as usual

I will actually ask an almost sane question... Is there a place to put 'funny stubs'? Like the User:MrN9000/Fat americans thing I found. You know, stuff which is not suitable for the main space, or even the dictionary, but still might be funny to many people. Well funny to us guys who have nothing better to do than hang around Cajeks talk page I mean. MrN 05:58, Dec 27

Perhaps a category? Category:Funny Stubs?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 05:59)

That would be in the main space though? Which people might not like. I'm thinking create a list somewhere. Kinda like un-dictionary, but for un-modified stuff saved from QVFD. You put it in an alphabetical list, but people don't edit the 'articles' at all. They just stand as they are. MrN 06:02, Dec 27

Categories don't have to apply to mainspace, sir!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 06:03)

Check out this

Yo can you check out HowTo:Study for a Test and see what else you can add. I'm a bit lost here.-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 15:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

RE your post in Ban patrol

I would put some links to specific examples of the kind of things you are talking about. As it is now, your asking quite a lot of an Admin to look through the contributions to find what you are talking about. You don't want them to miss the main issues which you have. MrN 05:45, Dec 28

It would be nice if he was gone for a while... If you don't know what I'm talking about, maybe I should strike it.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 05:47

I have seen a few comments here and there. Whatever you do, don't remove it!!!! MrN 05:53, Dec 28

Once you have added something to Ban patrol it's there. You will probably get banned yourself if you remove it now. Seriously. Just put some links to specific things in with your post. I did not see what happened in Pee Review. But I have noticed a few other things here and there. DO NOT REMOVE IT! MrN 05:55, Dec 28

HowTo:Become the next LotofLOLS

Since you did the review and we both agree the article is crap, should we VFD it and get out of the way, or would you like to wait a bit? I think it has little potential for improvement, what about you--Æ 12:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

/me wanders in I would leave it as it is. Especially considering what else has happened regarding this issue. We probably need this article actually. It's not VFD quality wise in my view anyway. Just forget about the whole thing eh AE? MrN 13:18, Dec 28

I agree w/ N   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 13:19

new subject header = easier for cajek to find me

finished up your image, you can find it here. let me know if it's ok, or any changes you want, i'd be more than happy to improve upon it. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I can't think of how to improve on it now, but here, have this: Uncyclopedia:VFP/Image:Gotmailplatoon.JPG   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 17:01