Uncyclopedia talk:VFH/Chuck Norris
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- Abstain I'm very glad that it was rewritten. And in comparison to the old version of the article, this is literary genius. Unfortunately, I don't find it very funny. I'm all for its feature, if others find it featurable, so I won't vote against, and in fact this article is a sign that Uncyc is really becoming a better site every day, eliminating the petty memes that once cluttered the site. I just can't bring myself to for it though, keeping in the tradition of wanting to put the funniest articles on the main page. It's still a great rewrite though, and I hope it stays for a long time. -RAHB 03:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- On the subject of quality improvement: Oscar Wilde, Chuck Norris, Russian Reversal and Encyclopedia Dramatica rewritten all in the same year? Madness! -- 03:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Abs. Woah, spooky, came back from reading the article with a comment in mind, only to find RAHB had already written it. Some time ago. /me takes hat off to RAHB's precognitive mind-reading powers. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
*Abstain - I rarely decide not to vote on an article, but this time I must. While this page is good material and follows the proposed containment policy, I think Chuck has become such a meme that featuring an article about him would make new readers think Uncyclopedia is an encyclopedia of memes, not a wiki about satire and humor. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 18:02, September 9, 2007
- If they read the article, then I don't think there would be a better way of explaining how Uncyclopedia is a wiki of satire and humour. The Oblong Lobster 19:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)