Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnBooks:Rorschach's journal

Article: UnBooks:Rorschach's journal	Score: 4 inkblots
Nominated by:	Guildensternenstein 14:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
For: 9	Nom & For. In honor of the Watchmen movie (which better not, better not, suck). Although I do think this is an excellent article in it's own right. Original Pee is here for those who are interested, though it's been revised a good deal since that review's been written. Also, this is my first nomination that isn't a self-nom; hurray for me! --Guildensternenstein 14:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Weak f♥r. The ending is a bit weak, but the rest is great. —Sir SysRq (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Conditional For Get rid of that God awful "who emos the emos" thing on the side. I've been a huge Watchmen fan (Rorschach in particular) for years, and I gotta say you've nailed his style in a great satirical way. If it wasn't for that stupid banner on the side, my vote would be a Strong For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:59, 6 Mar For. We are such nerds. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:09, Mar 6 For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Strong For. Sigh. I accidentally splattered a big inkblot here. Must investigate further. --A. SHePerD 03:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC) For. I liked. I proofed. I liked summore. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:32, 08 Mar 2009 Another Conditional For If he takes my Pee Review advice and fixes some of the grammar and formatting mistakes.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 21:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC) For. :) » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 13:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC) For. ØSalamander (Talk / Contributions) 10:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC) It's a bit of an inkblot on the landscape. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:08, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Against. Yer kidding, right? Apart from the lazy emo and gay lines, and the need for a decent proofread (yeah, maybe it fits with a blog style, but even so...) this is kinda diverting, but didn't make me laugh anywhere, and I just don't see a feature anywhere in it. Mind you, it's better than the movie's almost certainly gonna be. --UU - natter 16:22, Mar 6 Against. I didn't get it, and it needs some formatting fixes (if it was cleanuped up, I would have voted "Abstain, for now" Mnb'z 03:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC) Against. Djdorama 22:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abs. Sorry ASHPD. As You know, this one went straight over my head. Mr N 12:46, Mar 8 Um 81.165.231.26 20:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Abstain I'm just a caveman. Your modern comics confuse and frighten me. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 06:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)