| Article: Squall Leonhart
|
Score: -3
|
| Nominated by:
|
194.81.36.9 11:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
|
For: 0
|
No for votes
|
Against: 3
|
- Crap
and Not Eligible as it's an IP nom. Apparently it doesn't matter. But the article is still closer to VFD than VFH. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 15:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Yup, it's crap. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- I feel no scruples voting against an IP address. -- Le Cejak • <-> 18:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- There's no rule against an IP nom. If it's in fact crap, is a different issue. ~
 15:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- I thought there was? My mistake. There should be... EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 17:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- The only rule against IPs that I'm aware of is that their votes are counted as half. There are actually some good IP contributors, so I wouldn't make any harsh regarding their participation. They are, however, all bots operated by mindless Zombies. ~ 17:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
