From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Justin Bieber
|
Score: 13.5 straight men caught masturbating to teenage boys
|
| Nominated by:
|
– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:51 Mar 18, 2011
|
For: 13.5
|
 Nom & For. The writing is so beautifully encyclopedic I almost believed every word. Then I woke up from the nightmare and realized that, in such a sane, orderly universe as ours, such a person could not possibly exist. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:51 Mar 18, 2011- fap fap fap I read this during construction and was wondering when it was going to show up here. Aleister 3:54 18-3-'11
 For! Definitely feature this. That way, it will never end up on VFD in a hopelessly degenerated form again! Oh, and the article's great, too. --  Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:04, March 18, 2011 (UTC)- For. I think its missing one more picture of Bieber but I still like it. 137.159.94.172 05:41, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Considering this was a rewrite to keep it from degenerating into abusive crap, this has turned out very well.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:19, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Funnybony
   11:58, Mar 18 11:58, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:40, 18 March 2011
- I got Bieber Fever yeah yeah yeah. I'm pretty sure you could copypasta this into Wikipedia and nobody would be able to dispute the accuracy. --Holy Shit It's Neonazi powell 14:54, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
- For It's always more difficult to do proper Wikipedia-style encyclopedic topics and this one is done brilliantly. mAttlobster. (hello)
- For. The introduction is just awesome.
 21:52, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
- It'll do. 1234 ~
 00:29, 20 March 2011
- For. ~
   08:59, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Never trust virginal Canadian teenagers - i used to be one and I couldn't sing either--Sog1970 09:23, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
- For. One paragraph in and this is featureworthy StupidBunny
 10:05, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain.Though this article is funny, Hyperbole still hasn't implemented any of the recommendation of my pee review. I still thinks this needs some work and expansion before attaining feature-quality. Scofield 11:23, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Nom & For. The writing is so beautifully encyclopedic I almost believed every word. Then I woke up from the nightmare and realized that, in such a sane, orderly universe as ours, such a person could not possibly exist. 
For! Definitely feature this. That way, it will never end up on VFD in a hopelessly degenerated form again! Oh, and the article's great, too. -- 
Abstain.Though this article is funny, 