Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Inconspicuously Poop in the Urinal

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

HowTo:Inconspicuously Poop in the Urinal (history, logs)

Article: HowTo:Inconspicuously Poop in the Urinal

Score: -1 urinal dukeys

Nominated by: LongLiverh3 06:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
For: 6
  1. 1/2 self-nom and for. I don't know who remade this, they were funny, but their grammar sucked. I fixed that up though, so I think it's ready. --LongLiverh3 06:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. Okay, before you say anything I saw the name, and I was like, "what am I doing, about to click on that link?" It turns out, it was way better than I thought it would be. It's still not that great, but the difference between what I was expecting and what it was is worth a for vote as opposed to abstain.   Le Cejak <7:39 May 23, 2009>
  3. For per Cajek. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 08:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. --Docile hippopotamus 09:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. For. Not sure if I'm allowed to vote for my own rewrite, but I'm going to give it a go. Please delete if I'm wrong in doing so.ImNotASunbeam 17:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. For and For is 8. I don't really know my reason for agreement, but i think it's just the quality of the page.Hmm...--Bad Shroom 18:18, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  7. For Sexy Chick Red kiss.jpgZeitgeistKiss my ass.gif 18:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Against: 7
  1. Strong against Extended poo jokes, bland 2nd person narrative, insert name here tags. Did you make this article just for me to vote against? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 09:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. Symbol declined.svg Crap. Flashfreez 07:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  4. Against. I expect poop jokes to be treated with more maturity. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 10:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. Against. per above. Mnb'z 01:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. Against. per Mnbvcxz. Jackofspades.png (talk) 21:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  7. Against. Per Leddy's comments below. It's not bad, and it's a decent start, but it feels like so many other HowTo articles, and needs a bit more oomph, or something. I do, however, encourage the author to keep going, as this does show promise. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 13:04, May 26
  8. Against. Starts out kinda good, then just... thpbthpb. Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:09, May 26
Comments
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Abstain. I rethought my thinking. I usually base my vote on whether I'll feel embarrassed doing otherwise. I would feel pretty weird voting for this... Look, it's one AM on Saturday.   Le Cejak <7:50 May 23, 2009>
  • It's all right Cajek... you at least abstained. Did you know you might be gay? --Docile hippopotamus 09:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
    • I'll vote for when it gets to 7. Someone remind me, or just uncrossout my thingy. Also, that's not what your momma said last night! We had a good conversation about doilies and such.   Le Cejak <9:13 May 23, 2009>

Every article on VFH was made for you to vote against, DJ. --LongLiverh3 09:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Funny that, because I remember voting for one just on 30 seconds ago. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 11:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm the guy that adopted DJ, and he still votes against on 75% of my articles, so don't take it personally. You're doing fine, LongLiver.   Le Cejak <11:10 May 23, 2009>
I'd say something mean right now, but I don't want to get blocked. --LongLiverh3 16:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey! HEY! Sunbeam! You oughta give me some credit for this! Or you could work with me on the new article I recently started. Either way, message me on my talk page if you want to do either. And sign your name on talk pages. --LongLiverh3 19:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

  • I'm gonna write a howto article called howto: Write every howto article ever. 1: deliberately bizarre 2nd-person questions, 2: Restatement of the article's name so that it answers the questions, 3: Series of overly in-depth steps during which the reader is usually insulted several times, and 4: Reader does something wrong and the narrator gets pissed off to end the article. Seriously guys, how about some variety? - T.L.B. Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:05, May 24
  • LongLiver You do indeed deserve some credit; thank you very much for cleaning the article up and improving

it! I can guess that comment was Sunbeam's, since he never signs those. Like this. --LongLiverh3 03:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

  • TheLedBallon It was my first attempt at a HowTo let alone a rewrite and I was going to put it in Pee Review, but I woke up and it was here. ImNotASunbeam 06:52, 24 May 2009 (UTC).
    In all fairness, 2nd person in the HowTo genre is almost required. Also, HowTo is a good place for n00b writers to cut their teeth. Also also, abstain (for now). -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN18:14, 24 May
    Oh, I'm not saying it should be deleted, or is even a bad article, and I'm sorry if I implied that. In fact, I actually like the concept a lot, especially the nice juxtaposition of a word like 'inconspicuously' next to poop. And hell, a bunch of my articles probably fall under the same "template" trap. I just don't think this page, in its current state, should be featured without being made more unique. - T.L.B. Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:27, May 25

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH