Uncyclopedia:VFH/Gross Moral Turpitude

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Gross Moral Turpitude (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Gross Moral Turpitude	Score: 7 Questionable Nun-related Activities
Nominated by:	Mhaille Socky
For: 10	SNAFU....it kills me to see VFH stagnating like this... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Invalid nom. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:00, 10 March 2011  Valid Nom+For. It kills me to see Dexter unhappy. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:25, 9 March 2011 For. Might not make you laugh out loud, but this kind of intelligently-written humour is what we need on the front page. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:29, March 9, 2011 (UTC) For. Bah. ChiefjusticePS2 12:32, March 9, 2011 (UTC) For. ~  12:52, March 9, 2011 (UTC)  For. I believe nuns have a nasty habit. And  For. Sycamore's comments on the talk page. Aleister 12:54 9-3-'11 For. Bastards. -I have a talking zombie 19:21, March 9, 2011 (UTC) For. Sycamore (Talk) 19:22, March 9, 2011 (UTC)  For.--Sog1970 19:41, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Liked the start, like the result. Although... oh, whatever. 1234 ~ 20:15, 9 March 2011 Dammit, Mhaille... 1234 ~ 08:16, 10 March 2011 #For my unbalanced principles. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:34, March 9, 2011 (UTC) For. Nun better... --UU - natter 21:36, Mar 9
Against: 3	Ineligible nomination Self nom without a pee review. Admins shouldn't just ignore the rules that governor everyone else. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 07:22, March 10, 2011 (UTC) Oh, bloody hell. It's a stupid rule, but if we can't even pretend to follow our own, no wonder noobs sometimes get confused, do strange things, and wind up driven away. 1234 ~ 08:16, 10 March 2011 I love this article but I agree with Dexter. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:39, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	My understanding that the rules regarding self noms has been loosened to keep pee review more open to newer users... To be fair, Mhaille has come a long way in the past few months, I think his article can be judged on its merits here.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:48, March 10, 2011 (UTC) So it's fine if you have the ban button, but if you don't then you get your ass banned. Moral turpitude, right there. Not that this article even stands by itself. It's far too short, and half of the votes are only because it's talking about sexy nuns, not because it's funny. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 08:57, March 10, 2011 (UTC) You seem hostile, do you need a hug?;) I think its sunny, though I think it could have a bit more in certain areas. If every article was perfect neither you or myself would ever have had a feature, so cutting some slack in some areas is ok. Considering the amount of votes utter crap get on here, I think that if something is good it should get a vote.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:01, March 10, 2011 (UTC) I'm fully aware of my hostility. And I still stand by my comments about this not being funny. Normally, it wouldn't get an against vote from me, though. I'm going to go ahead and close it, since that is what Mhaille would do if somebody like User:Daramane were to nominate one of his articles without it having been on Pee Review; well, he would if he was more active on VFH and if Daramane had ever written an article... MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:10, March 10, 2011 (UTC) And since I'm going to be banned, I'm going to say this: Voters, quit voting for something just because it was written by your friends, and quit voting with your penises. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:19, March 10, 2011 (UTC) I fixed the nom. Ain't I great? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:00, 10 March 2011

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH