Forum:Vote to ban Chaoarren

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Vote to ban Chaoarren

Note: This topic has been unedited for 3538 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Since most of the uncyclop users hate me and I was thinking of creating a forum I discided to do this.

"I won't servive"

If the total score is more than three have voted for banning on the deadline of 31st August (23:59) I will not use uncyclopedia or IRC for a week.

If the requirement isn't meet I'll remain on uncyclop as normal. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 10:35, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Total score

Score: 5

Vote for ban

Score: 8

1. I vote boner to emphasize the flagrant, unconcealed, throbbing dickhead that you are. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 10:40, Aug. 25, 2014
2. Totally  For.. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 12:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
3. I don't hate you, but  you could do with a holiday. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 13:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
4.  For. nothing personal, this just makes sense. Madclaw @ ^talk 15:58, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
5.  Acted like a dick on irc today, AGAIN. Chilling would do good for you Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 17:22, 25 August, 2014 (UTC)
6. Ban all users -- The Zombiebaron 18:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
7. Ban Uncyclopedia --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 19:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
8. Ban all users - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 19:41, Monday 25 August 2014 -

   Banzai all users - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 21:58, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Don't ban

Score: 3

1. I don't hate ya buddy. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 10:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
2. I love you Chaoarren. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 14:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
3. Let him continue! Did he do anything bad? Why an indefinite block? The only thing I saw was his sockpuppets. Well, if he didn't use them for vote-rigging or block evasion, then what harm did they bring to this wiki? Anton (talk) 23:00, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

   Unfortunately you missed an extremely disruptive two-day affair on IRC where he tried to impersonate multiple users, stirred up shit with freenode and kept on threatening suicide. Also have a look through his block log and talk page. The ban had nothing to do with this forum, which by all accounts looks like a terrible joke, but because of loads of other problems he's been causing. He's not interested in making positive contributions to Uncyclopedia and we're not interested in having him if that's the case. -RAHB 23:16, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

   Thank you for taking time to patiently explain all this! But Chaoarren was not the only user who impersonated others on IRC. And I wouldn't say that he was uninterested in contributing positively, but rather didn't know how to do it. Banning him from IRC only might have been a good solution, but I guess he can always come back and ask to be unblocked, if he wants to. Anton (talk) 23:29, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

   It's true that Chaoarren didn't know how to contribute positively, but he's been consistently unwilling to take anyone's advice on how to do it either. He's admitted to having been a troll elsewhere on the internet and thrown empty threats around before to "get Uncyclopedia deleted from the internet" and shown an apparent desire to start flamewars (his words). I assume that he's about ten years old and just needs to grow up and mature. This ban isn't so much a punishment as it is a way for him to hopefully not get so caught up here and start spending time on actually growing as a human being elsewhere. And as much as I'd like for Uncyclopedia to be the kind of place that can help people to accomplish that, it's been proven time and time again that this just isn't the best place for it, and nobody here wants to have to deal with educating a child not to be a dick when his parents and teachers are the ones who should be taking on that responsibility. I hope that some day he'll be the kind of person who doesn't need to be banned from websites, but for now he is not that person. -RAHB 23:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)