User talk:Nintendorulez

“I'm going to fucking bury that guy. I've done it before and I'll do it again. I'm going to fucking kill Nintentdorulez”

~ Flammable on Nintendorulez

This foul knave hath been slain. If this is thy talk page, please note that thou art deceased.

The great and noble knight Kalir hath killed ∩intendorulez with his/her DS stylus because ∩intendorulez is a nefarious evil-doer.

---

Pay Recieved

Thank you muchly, Plot #4 is now yours.--The One and Only Czar Yah 17:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

League of Benson

You're in the League! Benson 22:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Unpocalypse

I was poking around the most linked to pages, when I noticed Unpocalypse was rather high up, even higher then the Main Page. I was shocked. When I first created the page nothing linked to it. So I tried to figure out how come it now had 279 (as of this message) pages linking to it. After poking around, I discovered that you had added it to your signature. A was amazed! When it was first nominated, Unpocalypse was resoundingly voted down due to its many inside jokes (it relies upon them for funny). I was wondering why you added it to your sig. I am highly flattered, and am not suggesting at all that you should remove it :). If this means that you have taken an intrest in the article and would like to see it featured, by all means nominate it whenever you like. --The Zombiebaron 22:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

I mainly added it since I'm the Anti-Chron. Mayble I'll nominate it later. --User:Nintendorulez 22:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for explaining it rashinally. --The Zombiebaron 22:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Google Issues

I have been on the forefront of the Freedom of Expression/{{C|template}} fight that's underway, currently because people believe that to be the reason Google removed us. I had another theory, but not being a gmail user, I can't test it out; until I noticed that you were one while looking to see if anyone had tried google on their forums. If i could pester you, could you try Running a diagnostic (preferably with Uncyc as the actual thing)? And if that's not a problem, could you look at their Automatic URL Removal to see how easy it is to remove someone else's website? I hate to ask a lot of you, good sir, but I'm wondering if there's more to this than google. Thanks, sir. --epynephrin 21:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, I'm not a webmaster here, and it says this is supposed to only be done by the webmaster. And there's some sort of verification thing to be done by putting some file in the root of the site. Which I certainly can't do. Try asking chron. --User:Nintendorulez 21:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

well, my theory was that someone else got jealous of our success, and deleted us from the google registry, but that quashes my theory altogether. Oh well, wasn't all that attached to it... --epynephrin 22:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Identity Theft

Check the talk page.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 00:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Quoting

Please see the disucssions here and here before adding any more quotes to Uncyclopedia. -- Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 20:38, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Cleanup Cleanup Everybody Everywhere

Sorry for the gratuitous Barney reference, but I wanted to let you know that I deleted the "User:Nintendorulez/B" redirect to "BBBBBBBBB!", just for the sake of general cleanup. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 22:43, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Sophia Timeline

I remember Sophia's timeline... I deleted it because it wasn't haiku. Sorry. Maybe you could put it in haiku and put it under Here's to Sophia or something. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 20:08, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

unsigned vote

Please sign your vote for the kanye template on Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/templates --Willy on wheels! 21:21, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

zork

I reverted your changes to zork, since it seems you did it without consensus of carlb or nerd42. If you wish to make changes, please see the discussion in the Dump. --Splaka 04:49, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Enlarged via code

You can enlarge images thusly with wikicode --Splaka 22:13, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC) : [[Image:Seizure.gif|400px|thumb]]

It seems to only work with thumbnails though, since this won't get bigger:

Complain complain. You can't resize inline images true. Fine, I uploaded a bigger vers. --Splaka 22:58, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. *kicks wikimedia software* You and your thumbnails! Although perhaps thumbnails might be even more painful to the eye for this template... --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 23:01, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Euroipods

If you recall, you are not allowed to touch Euroipods for any reason, whatsoever. I have reverted your edits and we're considering how to punish you for failing to follow the rules. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 03:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

There's an established policy which has been put into effect. Cheers. --KATIE!! 03:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Right purge your browser cache and check euroipods--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 22:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

IRC

The admins wish to discuss matters of great importance with you. Please come on to IRC, as the topic is about your special rules and it is of the upmost importance that you come now. --KATIE!!19:56, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Blasphemy! Oh well... all in good fun? --KATIE!! 21:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Award!

I award you this userbox for an indubitably enormous level of asshattery.

This user has attained a plane of asshattery previously thought unreachable and needs to be cockpunched immediately.

- Nonymous 20:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

YAY! My first award! ^_^ --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:45, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! Your efforts deserve recognition. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Thanks

Somebody has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

- Sikon 12:22, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

I tell ya, it was hilarious. I'm gonna set it as my mom's background and watch her keep clicking "OK", panic because they don't go away... etc... --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Expletive

Encyclop*dia Dramatica isn't censorship, the asterisk allegedly stands for a copyrighted letter that cannot be used on this site because of the fear of DMCA warnings. - Sikon 16:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Hence making it all the more offensive if we leave the copyrighted letter there. It's an expletive, is it not?

Cthulhu

Since we were able to trace the excellent question back to you, Cthluhu has asked that you be given this as a token of his gratitude.

This user has pleased Cthulhu

By aiding Cthulhu in his quest to obtain souls online.
So now: Surrender your soul!!!

---

--<<>> 23:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

And, while I'm at it...

Somebody has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

I appreciate your vote AND help with Do NOT click any links!. I think it's really awesome how good of a sport you've been about the Euroipods torture you've recieved. And for not holding my jokes about it against me.  :) Anywho, cheers.--<<>> 19:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

By the way, Nin. I don't know if you've noticed, but many users have cited the "clicking tangent" as their favorite part of this article. Good show! If I get featured article status, you're getting a ninjastar for that.--<<>> 17:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

As promised.--<<>> 02:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

^_^ No problem. It just seemed fitting to turn the pages links into further things, since obvoiusly you aren't supposed to click links, and I wound up going overboard, ard now we have that nice, long piece of madness. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 18:48, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

question

are you admin? maybe you can answer me what is the license of 88.153.142.102 20:34, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

No, I'm not an admin. And what kind of license would you be referring to? Copyright? Driver's? All I see is some image, and I have no clue who it is, where it comes from, etc. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 23:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

I reckon', it's Billie-Joe Armstrong. --Joewithajay 15:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Ban Patrol usage

You do not need to be an admin to use Ban Patrol and, in fact, Ban Patrol exists for the purpose of allowing astute non-admins to alert admins to problems. --Sir gwax (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought so. I just listed that in the summary just in case my assumption was wrong. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 22:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Do NOT click any links!/click33

You've ruined the sacred path to the secret of Uncyclopedia. For shame! - Nonymous 21:02, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Huh? How so? --User:Nintendorulez 21:05, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh, that was the redirect to Misleading. Yeah, we already had a page like that earlier on, I think it was #17. --User:Nintendorulez 21:07, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? Edit away on the main namespace page, but heed the comment and don't revert the discussion page. - Nonymous 21:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Well what was what appeared to be part of the main series doing on a discussion page? Whenever there's not a link, it's already established that you simply edit the URL. --User:Nintendorulez 21:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm not going to spell it out to you, but something about that page is different. It is a clue to a mystery, and not part of the main series. - Nonymous 21:26, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Not part of the main series? In that case, it ought to go elsewhere! --User:Nintendorulez 10:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

NRV vs. QVFD

Hi Nin. Whilst I appreciate your help in tagging short, worthless articles, please try to better judge which of the above options is more appropriate. I've just deleted a bunch of stuff, including a one-word article that you NRV tagged:

• (Deletion log); 18:22 . . Codeine (Talk | contribs | block) (deleted "Megalon": content was: 'A giant cockroach{{NRV|13:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)}}')
• (Deletion log); 18:22 . . Codeine (Talk | contribs | block) (deleted "Cotana": content was: 'cutey{{NRV|14:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)}}')

...for example. These two (and others like them) should go straight to QVFD - there's very little to suggest that the creator is intending to expand them, and they don't need to hang around cluttering up the Special:Shortpages for a whole week. NRV is generally for articles that could stand an outside chance of being saved. The guidelines for both are at Uncyclopedia:No Redeeming Value and Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD if you're uncertain, and there's also a VD discussion about it here. Cheers! -- Sir Codeine KUN VFP Bur. MDA NS UotM CM +S (Harangue) 17:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Ah. Yeah. I suppose I should use that more often... *coughI'malazyassholeandIfindtheonelittletemplatemucheasierandfastercough* --User:Nintendorulez 18:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Random crap ^_^

• • Jumps in the air** HOLY SHIT!-westsider17

*uses nowiki tag to print asterisks on a newline* Heheh. Hax. --User:Nintendorulez 18:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

NYD's

The New York Dolls were cross dressers. I'm 'accusing' them of being a baseball team. Pepé Le Pew 18:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Still unfunny NRV material. --User:Nintendorulez 19:09, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Cheers...

...for voting for my image Noob friendly almanack at VFP! It is much appreciated, although I think it's probably gonna be shot down. Have a pie my friend.

Enjoy. --Hindleyite Talk 12:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Heh, I must admit that you crossed my mind when I was trying to invent controversial comments and people for my book cover.  :) I had a feeling you might enjoy seeing RC's Featured!™ catchphrase on there, though I wasn't sure if you'd actually read the article. I'm glad you found it in time.  :) Thanks for the vote. ~ T. (talk) 04:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

The joke never gets old. Never. Ever. ^_^ --User:Nintendorulez 11:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

It will be passed on from father to son for all time.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

It certainly will. --User:Nintendorulez 11:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

A gift for you.

4chan has a Zelda porn thread going on right now. Jackpot! Peach as well. I know they get them a lot, but I was surprised they're there at the same time.

And a DOAX thread, but it's not very interesting.

There's also one going on for Cammy if you like other fighting games.

--Monika 18:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)