From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnNews:Scientific study reveals that David Bowie does not make sense
|
Score: 8 enigmatic metaphors
|
| Nominated by:
|
I live in your eyes 06:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 11
|
- Self Nom and For - No idea how this is going to go down, my first go at a featured article... Not that I'm trying to influence your vote or anything... I live in your eyes 06:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. - Made me smile. I would say that William Burrough's should be in there, and it's a bit of let down that you missed out stuff like his late seventies work.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. It's a nice UnNews. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- For Oh man, look at those cavemen go!--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 16:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 For. On balance a yes even if I think the article could have been slightly longer with some other Bowie name checks about his 'lyrical lying'. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 22:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)- For. per above. Mn-z 15:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. because I said so. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 05:48, 17 June 2009
- for. sure. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Funny stuff.
 TALK FRESH MEAT ♥ talk to me 16:49 24 June 2009 16:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- For Staircase CUNt 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- For. Damn Bowie never made sence! —
 Flutter  Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute!  07:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- ' For.'---
  TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 17:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
- The "taking song lyrics literally" premise seems kind of weak for a feature article. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 07:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against. There was half a paragraph "in the style of" that I liked, the rest... meh Pup 20:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not bad, but not feature-worthy. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:54, Jun 30
|
| Comments
|
Pee Review. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. On balance a yes even if I think the article could have been slightly longer with some other Bowie name checks about his 'lyrical lying'. --
