From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Tropical cyclone
|
Score: 14 times around
|
| Nominated by:
|
Nominally Humane! some time 05:38, 7/03/2010
|
For: 14
|
 Self-nom and for with two PEE reviews and a touch of re-working to get it there. Nominally Humane! some time 05:38, 7/03/2010- For. OK. Unique enough in my world to vote yes. Aleister in Chains 12:08 7.3.
- For. I've seen similar articles featured that were written the same without the swirliness. --Matfen 19:43, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak For I like the idea a lot, but I'm still not completely sold on this one purely because there is no chance of a reader finishing the article before the swirlyness happens. But it is very novel and amusing anyway. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 13:50, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
- For. --
   14:10, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:31, 8 March 2010
- 1/8th of a vote What the heck —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!!
  NOTM 18:13, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
- For. lol, funny.
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 00:08, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
- For Quality. --Sog1970 16:28, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
- For. • FreddCan Shredd •
 •  • 22:09 • Tuesday, 9-03-2010 22:09, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Another excellent job from Puppy, though I'd recommend making either the swirling more gradual or increasing the length of time it takes before it kicks in so readers can read more of the article. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:55, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Loved it. Especially the cheap "cyclone" gimmick MsuCarencro
- For. I read most of the article. LOL. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:52, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I guess an article about a tornado will end up with the text funnelling as it crosses the page.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:14, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Self-nom and for with two 
22:43, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
22:43, March 11, 2010 (UTC)