Uncyclopedia:VFH/The 9/11 Commission Report (again)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The 9/11 Commission Report (history, logs)

Article: The 9/11 Commission Report

Score: 2.5 Bearded guys

Nominated by: Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
For: 6.5
  1. Symbol for vote.svg Nom and For. There are a lot of gems on QFA. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol for vote.svg For. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 17:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
  3. Self Symbol for vote.svg For. Thanks, but this article shocks people, as you can see on its talk page. Anyway, I hope the event is old enough so people will find it funny :) Talk Mattsnow 17:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
  4. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Proudly bogan 22:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol for vote.svg For.  Kamek siggy.png ŤäŁķ ¿Ș₮áłĶ?฿¡฿↓¡ography 00:03 11.04.14
  6. Symbol for vote.svg For. a little disorganized and erratic...but funny ShabiDOO 07:11, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
  7. Symbol for vote.svg For. The 9/11 commission report 24.53.50.222 (talk) 12:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  8. Symbol for vote.svg For. The 9/11 Commission report (history, logs) 24.53.50.222 (talk) 12:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
    Twice? Greedy boy. --Nikau (talk) 13:51, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Against: 4
  1. Symbol declined.svg Against. --EMC [TALK] 04:08 Nov 18 2014
  2. Symbol declined.svg Against. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 11:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  3. Mydixaflopin Limp boner. Eh, sorry. I feel like to do this concept justice there needs to be a lot more subtlety. Currently I feel like I'm being beaten over the head with the same joke over and over again. The whole "WE ARE NOT PROPAGATING A CONSPIRACY (WINK WINK)" thing. Tone it down a bit, throw in some more cleverness, throw in maybe some silly stuff, that would be my advice for it. -RAHB 23:08, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol declined.svg Against. Sorry, Matt, but I agree with what RAHB is saying. You have clever ideas, but unfortunately the prose doesn't really reflect it. But work on the style a little and you'll get a masterpiece! Anton (talk) 13:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
    • No problem, thank you for the comment :) Talk Mattsnow 13:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • That IP's comment on the talkpage. Holy shit, that's hysterical! --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
    • I replied on his talkpage, and he answered me! At first he put his inflammatory comment at the end of the article! Talk about a pissed guy. Talk Mattsnow 18:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH