From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: HowTo:Misbehave in a Library
|
Score: 4 cunning librarians
|
| Nominated by:
|
 Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 04:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
|
For: 8
|
 Nom and For. Another quality article from QFA. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 04:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)- For. --Leverage (talk) 17:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 23:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. Nikau (talk) 03:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. This should have already been featured in 2008, so i can easily vote for this.
 ŤäŁķ ¿Ș₮áłĶ?฿¡฿↓¡ography 03:26 10.26.14
- For. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 17:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. Briwyint idea here EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 17:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. BlueberryBird (talk) 02:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC) BlueberryBird (talk) 02:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
 Against. Sorry again, but I think it's not ready. It starts extremely slowly, talking about fun and how fun and library don't go together, then suddenly invites the reader to have fun in the library giving him no reasons to do so, all the time, pursuing pretty primitive humour (librarians have no life, you have no life either). The prose isn't great either. It has some good moments, but I wouldn't say it should be on the main page. Anton (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Anton (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)- I got bored --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     11:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Against. This takes me back, I remember chopping an image for it. I thought then that it needed some ruthless pruning and I still do. The good ideas currently get lost. --UU - natter
 18:35, Nov 24
 Limp boner. Per everyone. This reminds of a time when this writing style was very common, and it makes me glad it isn't that time now. -RAHB 10:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Comment. I do agree it starts extremely slowly. The introduction should be moved up to where the quotes are currently. Nikau (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)- Comment. It borders on the tacky for me. With some cuts and a couple lol moments this could be great imho ShabiDOO 07:08, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
04:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Nom and For. Another quality article from QFA. --
Against. Sorry again, but I think it's not ready. It starts extremely slowly, talking about fun and how fun and library don't go together, then suddenly invites the reader to have fun in the library giving him no reasons to do so, all the time, pursuing pretty primitive humour (librarians have no life, you have no life either). The prose isn't great either. It has some good moments, but I wouldn't say it should be on the main page. 
Comment. I do agree it starts extremely slowly. The introduction should be moved up to where the quotes are currently. 