Uncyclopedia:VFH/Give a shit

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Give a shit (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Give a shit	Score: 13 shits given
Nominated by:	EMC [TALK] 23:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 15	Self-nom & for, but who gives a shit. --EMC [TALK] 23:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)  For.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)  For. --Mnbvcxz 15:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC) For. high quality shit 79.117.118.250 18:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC) For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC) For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:59, Jan 17  For.—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 21:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Strong for. Easily my favorite article of 2009 so far. Also: a significantly better article than Nobody cares. pillow talk 06:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC) For. 76.247.115.61 22:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC) FOR FOR FOR, I hope he Give a Shit!. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 22:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC) For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 4 --PCgamerMofo 19:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC) For. Depressing. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)  , but who gives a crap? OR a shit? Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 01:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC) For. --UU - natter 13:28, Jan 27
Against: 2	Against. you know when you say a word too many times and it becomes strange? Mallorex 09:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Weak against. Looks like a lot of work went into it, but I think the two concepts were done better in nobody cares and Fisher Price: A Retrospective. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 03:12, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Have some shit of mine. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Changing to abstain, because it's been bothering me that this is just a more profane, albeit better, nobody cares. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:57, Jan 20 Then let's un-feature nobody cares and feature this in its stead. pillow talk 18:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Comment This, I reckon, is a somewhat more pre-meditated version of UN:N. One may argue that this does not deserve to be featured due to the fact that UN:N exists or some other similar reasons, although one may also argue who gives a... You get the idea. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.