Uncyclopedia:VFH/Gay (second nom)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Gay (history, logs)

Article: Gay

Score: 3 closet homosexuals

Nominated by: MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:46, Nov 8
For: 5
  1. Nom+4 Last time it was nominated it was Gay. It's a bit less gay now, so vote for it you gays. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:46, Nov 8
  2. For but only because of how gay MrN is. Maybe he should change his name to MrGayFagGayGayGay9000. (Burn.) --Mr. Monkey Sockmonkey.gif Pant-hoot here. 00:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
  3. MrN57! I like this. Was probably too harsh when I reviewed it, in retrospect. SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag.jpg RotM 02:26 8 November 2008
  4. Symbol for vote.svg This is how you fix a heavy vandalism article. Ж Kalir with all the grace of a tin can 07:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
  5. Symbol for vote.svg For.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Against: 2
  1. Seriously!!! --Mnbvcxz 02:08, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
  2. Symbol declined.svg Against. per UU...even though he's abstinent--PaddyAtkinson 23:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

This was funnier, sorry --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 12:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

  • Abstain. The first half was good, but I kinda lost my enthusiasm in the second half. Oh well. Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:11, Nov 10
  • Mnbvcxz - Point taken. What was I thinking??? Anyway, I stripped out that crappy bit. Also, an IP actually added a decent quote to this article!!! WTF? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 21:37, Nov 12
    • The quote: Really? SK Sir Orian57Talk Gay flag.jpg RotM 08:07 13 November 2008
      • Made me giggle. Sums up the article rather well I thought. Got a better one? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:14, Nov 13
  • Its still a little too rambling for a featured article. It has this "written by a dozen authors" feel to it. Plus, its gay--Mnbvcxz 01:21, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Abstain. Awesome job of fixing a vandal magnet. But while it's now a decent article, and contains some good bits, and I never thought that would happen, I don't think it's a feature. Too many bullety mini-list bits, for one, and as Necropaxx says, some bits don't work as well as others. I'm impressed, but not in a "feature this" kind of way. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:14, Nov 16

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH