Uncyclopedia:VFH/Category:The Full Hilary

Article: Category:The Full Hilary	Score: 1
Nominated by:	Aleister
For: 5	selflishnomfor™ "The Full Hilary" is coming up on its second anniversary, and since it may have been forgotten by the forgetful few among us, it may be time to add to its glory (and/or shame) and again claw its way back onto the main page. And if you are Crimean, vote quickly please. thanks for the read! (I will now categorize this page into the category "The Full Hilary")Aleister 19:11 5-3-14 We feature categories. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:06, 6 Mar 2014 For -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 09:36, Mar. 14, 2014 --Mimo &maxus 14:00, 14 March 2014 (UTC) Boner. Hilary Duff is finally old enough Madclaw @ ^talk 21:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Against: 4	The accident is funny, the category isn't. Anton (talk) 17:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC) Hilary's quote was great, though, but the beginning is just storytelling. Sorry. Anton (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC) -- Aleister 18:05 11-3-14 Against. Argylesocks (talk) 09:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC) Against. Mattsnow 23:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC) I want pictures of Hillary Duff's navel. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Mar 20 '14 3:33 (UTC)
Comments	I like the concept but...do we feature categories? I guess we feature categories...? The restrictions on what type of page we feature are pretty squishy if they exist at all except in my head. If you know what I mean. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:43, 5 Mar 2014 -- Aleister 14:33 6-3-14 About featuring categories, it says at the top: 'Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, UnTunes, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.' – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:32, 12 Mar 2014 Hi Llwy. Nah, this is a nom which would have either picked up lots of votes quickly or not at all. May just as well take it down now. But thanks for liking it, and for giving a darn. Al 20:45 12-3-14 Aw. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:47, 12 Mar 2014 Category is not an actual project namespace (I think they were talking about this), that's just that Uncyclopedia features anything and everything! But that was not the reason for my vote against, I hope you understand! Anton (talk) 20:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC)