| Keep |
- I think this article was disgusting, but it's not so bad that it needs to be deleted. --
 Kaizer the Bjorn takkun  (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 12:50, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- "Sounds like you had a big day today champ!" keep keep keep --So So 04:35, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strongest possible keep. If for no other reason, the pics, man. Everyone's got their own sense o' humour. -- Imrealized 04:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keepers! c • > • cunwapquc? 05:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- No way is this getting deleted. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- I don't find it funny myself, but as I said when voting against it for VFH, I can see it would be some people's kettle of doody. TheMono 06:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- This got VFH'd? I was kidding, I tell you! (Keep anyway) >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN ▋ 06:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 06:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)- Keep, I say... And while we're at it, restore the bation of glory that was Duel Masters. That was fuckin' classic. (And was simultaneously ran on both VFH and VFD, thanks to yours truly) TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 17:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- For great justice! --Spin 20:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't vote for it, (actually, yes I did) Keep keep keep!! --
 SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 18:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep! Must keep! ~ Chaote 20:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Worth a few chuckles. A few. --ZombieJeff 00:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- You guys are all freaking me out here - it almost reminds me of those mobs of angry villagers from 1930's horror movies. Nobody's going to cry if this doesn't get featured, but why delete it? It has "cult" appeal. Either way, it's not really doing any harm, and if you think about it, articles like this help prevent everything else on the site from looking all... samey. It's just one article, and surely there's a place for the "so bad it's good" aesthetic here, isn't there? Anyway, I can easily see this turning into another Talk:Euroipods, so... please? c • > • cunwapquc? 05:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Its just REALLY bad... and the way its going..let the flamewar begin. --Sir Cornbread 05:36, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Completely infantile article. "It's not doing any harm"? You act like this article is a nest of honeybees. First of all, only two real articles link to it, and second of all, the original author was evidently completely unaware of article guidelines on Uncyclopedia, which may prove why this article blows. --emc! ╬ 05:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Precisely, the submitter's only contrib is this article, and hes been M.I.A. since April 18. I might have found this funny when I was 5 years old, but not now. And please, Sikon, HUFF IT, cuz you have that authority. --Sir Cornbread 07:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- I will restore it if it gets huffed. >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN ▋ 07:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Its not so much that I care if its on the site, so long as its in a dark hidden corner, but this CANNOT EVER be a featured article. --Sir Cornbread 07:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, by all means boot it off of VFH as soon as possible. Hopefully nobody's trying to be unreasonable here... But EMC, of course it's infantile - that's the whole point! And what do honeybees have to do with anything? All I'm saying is that it's not hateful, it's not an attack on anyone or anything, and it's not even overtly obscene (unless you actually read it, of course). It's just demented, and that's why some of us are going to like it, and some of us aren't. Hey, some of us are just demented. Surely there's no need to get all flamey about it, is there? c • > • cunwapquc? 07:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- But half the fun of the interweb is getting all flamey! My point is that this article about shit is taking up valuable space that could be occupied by something, um, that's not about shit. Just you wait, one day you'll write the most bestest page ever™ and when you go to save, the interweb will give you whatever error it gives when it's full. Then you'll cry because you will remember the time that you, literally, fought for shit. Don't make me end this discussion by saying that Hitler would have wanted to keep it? Dang, I just did. Pesky Hitler... Modusoperandi 08:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hitler was demented too, wasn't he? Besides, I'm not literally fighting for this article, nor shit in general - I'm just posting written responses to a public interweb site in support of (sh)it. Think of it this way - without shit, where would we be? Everything we ate would just stay right there in our colons, would it not? Surely, each of us would soon weigh many, many thousands of pounds as a result, and the risk of various colo-rectal ailments would increase immeasurably, perhaps even exponentially. Is this really what you want? Is this the kind of world you wish to live in? For shame, I say - I, Some user, wish to live in a world where human beings are free to relieve themselves of solid waste, at appropriate times and places, without fear of shame or retribution. In short, a glorious world of shit! Who's with me? Together we can overcome the forces of anal-retention and take back our sphincters! GOD BLAST AMERICA! c • > • cunwapquc? 05:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Just for the record, in response to Modusoperandi's latest comment... If this article, or any other article for that matter, is ever deleted, it will still be on the uncyclopedia servers, as will it's entire history and deletion log. In fact, one could argue, because of the deletion log being there, and in Special:Log/delete, the article would actually take up more space on our servers deleted then it would in it's current state. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Still, those "Sorry, Internet Full" errors can be rather emotionally scarring. c • > • cunwapquc? 06:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Besides, even if it ends up taking up more space when huffed, that space will be filled with our victory over the forces of shit, rather than just shit. Onward, to victory! Modusoperandi 19:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it appears we're still divided on this...everyone on the keep side should just give in... Sir C Holla | CUN 04:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Holy..... This had to be the longest discussion ever...I didn't know my VFH of it would lead to an explosion on VFD... -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 20:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
All right, with a net score of 6 to keep and having been on VFD forever, I'm ruling this one a keeper. You don't have to like it, but it's staying. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 19:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, as long as you promise to feed it, brush it's fur, and play with it everyday. Remember what happened to the goldfish that we got for you...Modusoperandi 19:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
|
