Forum:I'm 93% man
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > I'm 93% man
Note: This topic has been unedited for 5435 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
According to this my userpage, written by me, proves that I'm 93% man. That's right, ladies. All that and I'm single and I'm not allowed within 50 feet of the local Honda dealership. Don't ask. Honda knows what it did. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Apparently I'm 100% man. I'm not allowed within 50 feet of the local Honda dealership either, however I don't need that queer Japanese crap. I drive a monster truck made out of bears and cougars that I personally wrestled with only my chest hair. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
23:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- 96%! Go me! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:59, Nov 29
- I just fed it seven different things I've written and I scored above 95% man for each of them. I look forward to my penis. --monika 01:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- 98% mutha fucka! --EMC [TALK] 07:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- 95% man. Does this mean I am 5% inhuman? --Nachlader 08:50, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- 99% man. I suspect the 1% woman is because I used the word "please". I've got to stop showing my softer side like that. --UU - natter
08:59, Nov 30
- 100%, I guess the B2 bomber gives it away...--Sycamore (Talk) 09:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm... 98%. Apparently, each of my nipples counts as a percentage point toward being female.--<<
>> 17:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- "http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:RabbiTechno is written by a man (100%)." I was pretty surprised about that, especially considering as how I'm wearing lipstick and a dress. RabbiTechno 17:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- 98% man FTW! :D Also, Uncyclopedia itself is 99% man. -
Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 
18:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- 100% \o/ - UnIdiot |
| Talk | Contribs - 19:15, Nov 30
- All I can say about this is that I have an enormous cock. Thank you very much. -RAHB 20:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, according to my business website, I'm 98% female, which I guess makes me a lesbian. Who'd've guessed it? Anyone got some dungarees they're not using? Asahatter (annoy) 21:16, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- I actually couldn't seem to find any pages that got rated as feminine, possibly because the site just assumes that there are no girls on the internet. Then I found a twilight forum and checked that, and it apparently sweats out pure estrogen. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:06, Nov 30
- I actually couldn't seem to find any pages that got rated as feminine, possibly because the site just assumes that there are no girls on the internet. Then I found a twilight forum and checked that, and it apparently sweats out pure estrogen. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
- 100%! Was there ever any doubt? No, there wasn't. Shut up. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:26, Dec 1
- Well, according to my business website, I'm 98% female, which I guess makes me a lesbian. Who'd've guessed it? Anyone got some dungarees they're not using? Asahatter (annoy) 21:16, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- All I can say about this is that I have an enormous cock. Thank you very much. -RAHB 20:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- 100% \o/ - UnIdiot |
- 98% man FTW! :D Also, Uncyclopedia itself is 99% man. -
- "http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:RabbiTechno is written by a man (100%)." I was pretty surprised about that, especially considering as how I'm wearing lipstick and a dress. RabbiTechno 17:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm... 98%. Apparently, each of my nipples counts as a percentage point toward being female.--<<
- 100%, I guess the B2 bomber gives it away...--Sycamore (Talk) 09:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- 99% man. I suspect the 1% woman is because I used the word "please". I've got to stop showing my softer side like that. --UU - natter
- 95% man. Does this mean I am 5% inhuman? --Nachlader 08:50, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- 98% mutha fucka! --EMC [TALK] 07:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- I just fed it seven different things I've written and I scored above 95% man for each of them. I look forward to my penis. --monika 01:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- 96%! Go me! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
Whut
We have strong indicators that http://www.uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Fag is written by a man (100%). —
talk 17:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- How does that happen when mine is 99% man? Colin
ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- I just tried Sannse's. 92% man. RabbiTechno 19:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Wut?
We have strong indicators that http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:I_Am_A_Woman is written by a man (100%). Huh? - 
Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 
22:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Eww. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:48, Dec 3
- We have strong indicators that http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:Sonic80 is written by a man (100%).
OBAMA • SONIC80 -- ( Praise • Masterpieces • Contributions ) (Thar be-eth a timestamp --> 22:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- We have strong indicators that http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:Sonic80 is written by a man (100%).
WTF!
That site is 100% f*ucking bullsh*it! It must have been written by an a&&hole man because every uncyc page I've contributed to or written is assumed to be 100% man. Jackasses!. --Okra Winfrey 05:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Didn't you wonder why your gynecologist keeps sighing? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:55, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- I would imagine they'd be enjoying the job. --Nachlader 09:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- I don't believe in gynocologists anymore than chiropractors. A medical science built around inspecting a woman's interior and feeling up her exterior? No f*ucking way. I'm not falling for that. What a bunch of quacks. I'd like to see a study of how many ugly women have to be treated for "cervical dicrepencies" vs. attractive ones. And why isn't there a medical division for testing men for cancer of the d#ick? Could it be because no man would lie on his back with his feet in stirrups while a woman doctor rotoreuters his organs for suspicious cells that most likely will never turn cancerous? --Okra Winfrey 06:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hot damn! I sure would! -RAHB 06:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Men don't normally get dick cancer (we get testicular cancer, which is fast acting and generally diagnosed by the "ohmygodthereisalumponmyballs!" method, and prostate cancer which, if anything, is worse than the gynecologist, as the method of inspection uses what's generally considered to be an outroute as an inroute and a tiny little spelunker with a helmet, light and pickaxe). Lastly, I distinctly hope that was the least funny thing I've ever said while here. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm just gonna leave this here...based on a real pamphlet given to me by my real doctor. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:24, Dec 11
- My personal philosophy is that if the lump is equilateral, such as on both knees, ankles, or earlobes, then it isn't cancer. If the lump is only on one leg or boob, wait 3 years and if you don't die, then it wasn't cancerous. Works every time. --Okra Winfrey 07:22, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- The one parked in the windowless van? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:28, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Nah, I have a new guy now, in the alley between Petey's Bar and Barley's Pub. He's the guy with the bathtub full of ice and the bucket. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:39, Dec 11
- Does he work for wikipedia? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 03:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Does he work for wikipedia? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
- Nah, I have a new guy now, in the alley between Petey's Bar and Barley's Pub. He's the guy with the bathtub full of ice and the bucket. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
- I'm just gonna leave this here...based on a real pamphlet given to me by my real doctor. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
- I don't believe in gynocologists anymore than chiropractors. A medical science built around inspecting a woman's interior and feeling up her exterior? No f*ucking way. I'm not falling for that. What a bunch of quacks. I'd like to see a study of how many ugly women have to be treated for "cervical dicrepencies" vs. attractive ones. And why isn't there a medical division for testing men for cancer of the d#ick? Could it be because no man would lie on his back with his feet in stirrups while a woman doctor rotoreuters his organs for suspicious cells that most likely will never turn cancerous? --Okra Winfrey 06:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I would imagine they'd be enjoying the job. --Nachlader 09:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)